Literature DB >> 28568156

BODY SIZE, NATURAL SELECTION, AND SPECIATION IN STICKLEBACKS.

Laura Nagel1, Dolph Schluter2.   

Abstract

There is little evidence from nature that divergent natural selection is crucial to speciation. However, divergent selection is implicated if traits conferring adaptation to alternative environments also form the basis of reproductive isolation. We tested the importance of body size differences to premating isolation between two sympatric sticklebacks. The species differ greatly in size, and several lines of evidence indicate that this difference is an adaptation to alternative foraging habitats. Strong assortative mating was evident in laboratory trials, but a few hybridization events occurred. Probability of interspecific mating was strongly correlated with body size: interspecific spawning occurred only between the largest individuals of the smaller species and the smallest individuals of the larger species. Probability of spawning between similar-sized individuals from different species was comparable to spawning rates within species. Disruption of mating between individuals from different species can be traced to increased levels of male aggression and decreased levels of male courtship as size differences increased between paired individuals. Interspecific mate preferences in sympatric sticklebacks appears to be dominated by body size, implicating natural selection in the origin of species. © 1998 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Adaptive radiation; body size; natural selection; reproductive isolation; speciation; stickleback

Year:  1998        PMID: 28568156     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05154.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  35 in total

1.  Evolutionary branching of a magic trait.

Authors:  Eva Kisdi; Tadeas Priklopil
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Molecular characterization of two endothelin pathways in East African cichlid fishes.

Authors:  Eveline T Diepeveen; Walter Salzburger
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Testing alternative explanations of character shifts against ecological character displacement in brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans) that coexist with ninespine sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius).

Authors:  S M Gray; B W Robinson; K J Parsons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments.

Authors:  Timothy H Vines; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Incipient speciation through niche expansion: an example from the Arctic charr in a subarctic lake.

Authors:  Rune Knudsen; Anders Klemetsen; Per-Arne Amundsen; Bjørn Hermansen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Ecological divergence exhibits consistently positive associations with reproductive isolation across disparate taxa.

Authors:  Daniel J Funk; Patrik Nosil; William J Etges
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Divergent evolution of feeding substrate preferences in a phylogenetically young species flock of pupfish (Cyprinodon spp.).

Authors:  Joachim Horstkotte; Martin Plath
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-08-19

8.  Host-parasitoid evolution in a metacommunity.

Authors:  Denon Start; Benjamin Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sympatric and allopatric divergence of MHC genes in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Blake Matthews; Luke J Harmon; Leithen M'Gonigle; Kerry B Marchinko; Helmut Schaschl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evolution of gigantism in amphiumid salamanders.

Authors:  Ronald M Bonett; Paul T Chippindale; Paul E Moler; R Wayne Van Devender; David B Wake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.