Literature DB >> 10937268

Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction.

F Y Jia1, M D Greenfield, R D Collins.   

Abstract

When traits experience directional selection, such as that imposed by sexual selection, their genetic variance is expected to diminish. Nonetheless, theory and findings from sexual selection predict and demonstrate that male traits favored by female choice retain substantial amounts of additive genetic variance. We explored this dilemma through an ecological genetic approach and focused on the potential contributions of genotype x environment interaction (GEI) to maintenance of additive genetic variance for male signal characters in the lesser waxmoth, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). We artificially selected genetic variants for two male signal characters, signal rate (SR) and peak amplitude (PA), that influence female attraction and then examined the phenotypic plasticity of these variants (high- and low-SR and high- and low-PA lines) under a range of environmental conditions expected in natural populations. Our split-family breeding experiments indicated that two signal characters, SR and PA, and several developmental characters in both high- and low-SR and high- and low-PA lines displayed considerable phenotypic plasticity among the environments tested. Moreover, strong GEIs leading to crossover between high- and low-SR lines were found for SR and developmental period. Therefore, neither high- nor low-SR genetic variants would achieve maximum attractiveness and fitness in every environment, and those variants producing unattractive signals with low SRs under normal conditions may remain in populations provided that gene flow across environments or generation overlap are sufficiently high. We speculate that the phenotypic plasticity for SR and developmental period is adaptive in A. grisella populations experiencing a range of temperature and density conditions. Females mating with attractive (high-SR) males may be assured of obtaining good genes because these males sire offspring that develop more rapidly and a crossover for developmental period may parallel that for SR. Such parallel crossovers may be expected wherever good-genes sexual selection mechanisms operate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937268     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00095.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  18 in total

Review 1.  Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?

Authors:  Samuel Cotton; Kevin Fowler; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits.

Authors:  Donna Petfield; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja Heubel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.

Authors:  Christine W Miller; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.

Authors:  Anne M Danielson-François; Yihong Zhou; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Variation in the peacock's train shows a genetic component.

Authors:  Marion Petrie; Peter Cotgreave; Thomas W Pike
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Alycia C R Lackey; Catherine Durso; Jennifer A H Koop; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Maternal-by-environment but not genotype-by-environment interactions in a fish without parental care.

Authors:  Regina Vega-Trejo; Megan L Head; Michael D Jennions; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Mating order-dependent female mate choice in the polygynandrous common lizard Lacerta vivipara.

Authors:  Patrick S Fitze; Julien Cote; Jean Clobert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.