| Literature DB >> 32635394 |
Araceli Muñoz-Garach1, Beatriz García-Fontana2,3, Manuel Muñoz-Torres2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a common chronic disease characterized by a decrease in bone mineral density, impaired bone strength, and an increased risk of fragility fractures. Fragility fractures are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and disability and are a major public health problem worldwide. The influence of nutritional factors on the development and progression of this disease can be significant and is not yet well established. Calcium intake and vitamin D status are considered to be essential for bone metabolism homeostasis. However, some recent studies have questioned the usefulness of calcium and vitamin D supplements in decreasing the risk of fractures. The adequate intake of protein, vegetables and other nutrients is also of interest, and recommendations have been established by expert consensus and clinical practice guidelines. It is important to understand the influence of nutrients not only in isolation but also in the context of a dietary pattern, which is a complex mixture of nutrients. In this review, we evaluate the available scientific evidence for the effects of the main dietary patterns on bone health. Although some dietary patterns seem to have beneficial effects, more studies are needed to fully elucidate the true influence of diet on bone fragility.Entities:
Keywords: calcium intake; dairy products; dietary patterns; osteoporosis; protein; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32635394 PMCID: PMC7400143 DOI: 10.3390/nu12071986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Nutrient contents per 100 g of commonly used products.
| Source | Calcium (mg) | Phosphorous (mg) | Potassium (mg) | Vitamin D (IU) | Protein (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 119 | 93 | 151 | * | 3.3 |
|
| 122 | 101 | 156 | * | 3.4 |
|
| 791 | 567 | 77 | 20 | 26.9 |
|
| 721 | 512 | 98 | 24 | 24.9 |
|
| 98 | 106 | 138 | * | 5.9 |
|
| 183 | 144 | 234 | * | 5.3 |
|
| 128 | 105 | 199 | 0 | 3.5 |
|
| 9 | 0 | 360 | 600–1000 | 38 |
|
| 56 | 197 | 138 | 20 | 12.5 |
Data adapted from [43]. * Not available, depending on the amount fortified in each country.
Figure 1Nutrients and their bone effects.
Summary of larger studies relating bone status to each dietary pattern.
| Dietary Pattern | Name of the Study | No. Participants (Sex), | Effect on BMD | Effect on Fracture Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| EPIC Study [ | 188,795 | 7% decrease in hip fracture incidence | |
| CHANCES Project [ | 140,775 | 4% decrease in hip fracture risk | ||
| Meta-analysis, Malmir et al. [ | 358,746 | Positive association with lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip BMD | 21% reduced risk of hip fracture | |
|
| Singapore Chinese Health Study [ | 63,257 | 34% reduced risk of hip fracture | |
| Osteoporosis | 3735 | Dairy and fruit pattern decreased the risk of osteoporosis of the lumbar spine (53%); white rice, kimchi and seaweed dietary pattern was negatively associated with bone health | ||
|
| Co-twin controlled study, | 4928 | Inversely associated with BMD in femoral neck | |
| Framingham Offspring | 2740 | Higher intakes of red meat and processed food were inversely associated with femoral neck BMD | ||
|
| Bayesian meta-analysis | 2749 | 4% lower BMD (95% CI: 2%, 7%) at femoral neck and lumbar spine | |
| EPIC Oxford study [ | 34,696 | Fracture incidence rate ratios: 1.00 (0.89–1.13) for vegetarians and 1.30 (1.02–1.66) for vegans |