| Literature DB >> 29472791 |
Ashraf A Mostafa1,2, Abdulaziz A Al-Askar1, Khalid S Almaary1, Turki M Dawoud1, Essam N Sholkamy1, Marwah M Bakri3.
Abstract
Prevention of food spoilage and food poisoning pathogens is usually achieved by use of chemical preservatives which have negative impacts including: human health hazards of the chemical applications, chemical residues in food & feed chains and acquisition of microbial resistance to the used chemicals. Because of such concerns, the necessity to find a potentially effective, healthy safer and natural alternative preservatives is increased. Within these texts, Plant extracts have been used to control food poisoning diseases and preserve foodstuff. Antimicrobial activity of five plant extracts were investigated against Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhi using agar disc diffusion technique. Ethanolic extracts of Punica granatum, Syzygium aromaticum, Zingiber officinales and Thymus vulgaris were potentially effective with variable efficiency against the tested bacterial strains at concentration of 10 mg/ml while extract of Cuminum cyminum was only effective against S. aureus respectively. P. granatum and S. aromaticum ethanolic extracts were the most effective plant extracts and showed bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities against the highly susceptible strains of food borne pathogenic bacteria (S. aureus and P. aeruginosa) with MIC's ranged from 2.5 to 5.0 mg/ml and MBC of 5.0 and 10 mg/ml except P. aeruginosa which was less sensitive and its MBC reached to 12.5 mg/ml of S. aromaticum respectively. These plant extracts which proved to be potentially effective can be used as natural alternative preventives to control food poisoning diseases and preserve food stuff avoiding healthy hazards of chemically antimicrobial agent applications.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Food spoilage; Herbal plants; MIC; Natural preservatives
Year: 2017 PMID: 29472791 PMCID: PMC5815983 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.02.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
The ethnobotanical data of employed plant species and their extract yield percentage.
| Plant species | Family | Local name | Common name | Plant part used | Extract pH | Extract yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apiaceae | Kammun | Cumin | Seeds | 6.2 | 3.12 | |
| Lythraceae | Romman | Pomegranate | Peels | 4.7 | 9.74 | |
| Myrtaceae | Koronfil | Clove | Flowers | 5.3 | 4.38 | |
| Lamiaceae | Za'ater | Thyme | Leaves | 6.8 | 6.54 | |
| Zingiberaceae | Zanjabil | Ginger | Rhizome | 7.1 | 5.26 |
Antimicrobial screening test of ethanolic plants extract (10 mg/ml) against some bacterial strains of food poisoning diseases.
| Plant species | Inhibition zones (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram (+ve) pathogenic bacteria | Gram (−ve) pathogenic bacteria | ||||
| 0.0 ± 0.0 | 9.5 ± 0.74 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 16.3 ± 0.57 | 18.5 ± 0.13 | 14.2 ± 0.61 | 9.7 ± 0.22 | 16.1 ± 0.46 | |
| 14.6 ± 0.37 | 15.8 ± 0.41 | 11.9 ± 0.34 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 13.4 ± 0.11 | |
| 0.0 ± 0.0 | 17.6 ± 0.31 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 14.7 ± 0.25 | |
| 8.3 ± 0.46 | 15.4 ± 0.23 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 11.2 ± 0.17 | |
| Gentamycin (5 µg) | 16.8 ± 0.37 | 20.5 ± 0.24 | 15.6 ± 0.53 | 18.7 ± 0.61 | 13.1 ± 0.35 |
Data are means of three replicates (n = 3) ± standard error.
Fig. 1Growth inhibition of some food poisoning bacterial strains caused by plant extracts. Cu, Cumin; Po, pomegranate; Sy, Clove; Th, Thyme; Zn, Ginger and +C, positive control.
MIC's of the most effective plant extract against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.
| Plant ext. | Conc. mg/ml | Inhibition zones (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gram (+ve) pathogenic bacteria | Gram (−ve) pathogenic bacteria | ||
| 1.25 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 2.50 | 9.6 ± 0.65 | 8.3 ± 0.95 | |
| 05.0 | 14.8 ± 0.83 | 13.2 ± 1.1 | |
| 10.0 | 18.7 ± 0.75 | 16.4 ± 0.56 | |
| 12.5 | 21.4 ± 0.46 | 18.5 ± 0.36 | |
| 15.0 | 23.7 ± 0.35 | 22.6 ± 0.74 | |
| 1.25 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 2.50 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 05.0 | 11.4 ± 0.37 | 9.1 ± 0.80 | |
| 10.0 | 15.3 ± 0.85 | 12.8 ± 0.45 | |
| 12.5 | 16.6 ± 0.13 | 14.7 ± 0.52 | |
| 15.0 | 19.3 ± 0.65 | 17.5 ± 0.35 | |
Data are means of three replicates (n = 3) ± standard error.
Fig. 2MIC's of the effective plant extracts against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.