Literature DB >> 32600142

The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Andrew J Price1, Sujin Kang1, Jonathan A Cook1, Helen Dakin2, Ashley Blom3, Nigel Arden1, Ray Fitzpatrick4, David J Beard1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To calculate how the likelihood of obtaining measurable benefit from hip or knee arthroplasty varies with preoperative patient-reported scores.
METHODS: Existing UK data from 222,933 knee and 209,760 hip arthroplasty patients were used to model an individual's probability of gaining meaningful improvement after surgery based on their preoperative Oxford Knee or Hip Score (OKS/OHS). A clinically meaningful improvement after arthroplasty was defined as ≥ 8 point improvement in OHS, and ≥ 7 in OKS.
RESULTS: The upper preoperative score threshold, above which patients are unlikely to achieve any meaningful improvement from surgery, is 41 for knees and 40 for hips. At lower scores, the probability of improvement increased towards a maximum of 88% (knee) and 95% for (hips).
CONCLUSION: By our definition of meaningful improvement, patients with preoperative scores above 41 (OKS) and 40 (OHS) should not be routinely referred to secondary care for possible arthroplasty. Using lower thresholds would incrementally increase the probability of meaningful benefit for those referred but will exclude some patients with potential to benefit. The findings are useful to support the complex shared decision-making process in primary care for referral to secondary care; and in secondary care for experienced clinicians counselling patients considering knee or hip arthroplasty, but should not be used in isolation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):941-949.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip; Knee; Patient-reported outcome measure; Referral; Threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32600142      PMCID: PMC7376303          DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-0102.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  18 in total

1.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

2.  Which patients are most likely to benefit from total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Elizabeth M Badley; Cornelia M Borkhoff; Ruth Croxford; Aileen M Davis; Sheila Dunn; Monique A Gignac; Susan B Jaglal; Hans J Kreder; Joanna E M Sale
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-05

3.  Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery.

Authors:  A Judge; N K Arden; A Kiran; A Price; M K Javaid; D Beard; D Murray; R E Field
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-03

4.  Variations In Good Patient Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amit Kiran; Nicholas Bottomley; Leela C Biant; M Kassim Javaid; Andrew J Carr; Cyrus Cooper; Richard E Field; David W Murray; Andrew Price; David J Beard; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection?

Authors:  A Judge; N K Arden; A Price; S Glyn-Jones; D Beard; A J Carr; J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; R E Field
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-12

6.  What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients.

Authors:  Andrew David Beswick; Vikki Wylde; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Ashley Blom; Paul Dieppe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  David J Beard; Kristina Harris; Jill Dawson; Helen Doll; David W Murray; Andrew J Carr; Andrew J Price
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Data Resource Profile: Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC).

Authors:  Annie Herbert; Linda Wijlaars; Ania Zylbersztejn; David Cromwell; Pia Hardelid
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Extending the use of PROMs in the NHS--using the Oxford Knee Score in patients undergoing non-operative management for knee osteoarthritis: a validation study.

Authors:  Kristina K Harris; Jill Dawson; Luke D Jones; David J Beard; Andrew J Price
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kristina Harris; Jill Dawson; Elizabeth Gibbons; Chris R Lim; David J Beard; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Andrew J Price
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2016-07-25
View more
  9 in total

1.  The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Dakin; P Eibich; D Beard; A Gray; A Price
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Loss to patient-reported outcome measure follow-up after hip arthroplasty and knee arthroplasty : patient satisfaction, associations with non-response, and maximizing returns.

Authors:  Lauren A Ross; Sara C O'Rourke; Gemma Toland; Deborah J MacDonald; Nick D Clement; Chloe E H Scott
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-04

3.  The metabolic equivalent of task score : a useful metric for comparing high-functioning hip arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Thomas C Edwards; Brogan Guest; Amy Garner; Kartik Logishetty; Alexander D Liddle; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.410

4.  Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yiou Wang; Meihua Yin; Shibai Zhu; Xi Chen; Hongru Zhou; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Insights into patient preferences for elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Andrew James Hotchen; Saad A Khan; Maaz A Khan; Matthew Seah; Zain H Charface; Zarif Khan; Wasim Khan; Niel Kang; Joel Thomas Kirk Melton; Andrew W McCaskie; Stephen M McDonnell
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-04

6.  Is rationing of total hip arthroplasty justified? Working to optimize patient accessibility to surgery using long-term patient-reported outcome data.

Authors:  Robert W Walker; Sarah L Whitehouse; Jonathan R Howell; Matthew J W Hubble; A John Timperley; Matthew J Wilson; Al-Amin M Kassam
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-03

7.  Using Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionise the Patient Care Pathway in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty (ARCHERY): Protocol for the Development of a Clinical Prediction Model.

Authors:  Luke Farrow; George Patrick Ashcroft; Mingjun Zhong; Lesley Anderson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-05-11

8.  The Oxford Knee Score is a reliable predictor of patients in a health state worse than death and awaiting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; I Afzal; P Liu; K M Phoon; V Asopa; D H Sochart; D F Kader
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-08-03

9.  Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Injection (MFAT) May Be a Solution to the Rationing of Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective, Gender-Bias Mitigated, Reproducible Analysis at Two Years.

Authors:  Nima Heidari; Tiffanie-Marie Borg; Stefano Olgiati; Mark Slevin; Alessandro Danovi; Brady Fish; Adrian Wilson; Ali Noorani
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.443

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.