Literature DB >> 25817188

Variations In Good Patient Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Amit Kiran1, Nicholas Bottomley1, Leela C Biant2, M Kassim Javaid3, Andrew J Carr1, Cyrus Cooper3, Richard E Field4, David W Murray1, Andrew Price1, David J Beard1, Nigel K Arden3.   

Abstract

This study identifies optimal OKS values that discriminate post-operative (TKA) patient satisfaction and determines the variation in threshold values by patient characteristics and expectations. It is the first to identify patient improvement using measures (PoPC) that account for patient's pre-operative symptom severity. Of 365 primary TKA patients from a London district general hospital 84% were satisfied at 12 and 24 months. Whilst the overall OKS thresholds (follow-up, change, PoPC) were stable at 12 months (31, 11, 39.7%) and 24 months (35, 12, 38.9%), patients who were older (≥75years), were underweight/normal (BMI<25), had pre-operative symptom severity (OKS≤15) and expected no pain post-surgery, required a greater (potential) improvement to be classed as satisfied. When reporting good patient outcomes, cohorts should be stratified accordingly.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oxford Knee Score; PoPC; knee arthroplasty; patient reported outcomes; satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25817188     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Sujin Kang; Jonathan A Cook; Helen Dakin; Ashley Blom; Nigel Arden; Ray Fitzpatrick; David J Beard
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 2.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Predictive values of WOMAC, KOOS, and SF-12 score for knee arthroplasty: data from the OAI.

Authors:  M Faschingbauer; M Kasparek; P Schadler; A Trubrich; S Urlaub; F Boettner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The influence of obesity on achievement of a 'forgotten joint' following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vivek Singh; David Yeroushalmi; Katherine A Lygrisse; Trevor Simcox; William J Long; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Does Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey correlate with traditional metrics of patient satisfaction? The challenge of measuring patient pain control and satisfaction in total joint replacement.

Authors:  Edward K Jung; Karan Srivastava; Moneer Abouljoud; Robert Keller; Kelechi Okoroha; Jason Davis
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-08-04

6.  Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the knee society score following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong Zhi Khow; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham S Goh; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 7.  The effect of expectation on satisfaction in total knee replacements: a systematic review.

Authors:  Timothy Barlow; Tamsyn Clark; Mark Dunbar; Andrew Metcalfe; Damian Griffin
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-24

8.  Construct validation and correlates of preoperative expectations of postsurgical recovery in persons undergoing knee replacement: baseline findings from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; James Slover; Dennis Ang; Robert A Perera; Levent Dumenci
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.186

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.