Literature DB >> 9460955

Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.

J Dawson1, R Fitzpatrick, D Murray, A Carr.   

Abstract

We have developed a 12-item questionnaire for patients having a total knee replacement (TKR). We made a prospective study of 117 patients before operation and at follow-up six months later, asking them to complete the new questionnaire and the form SF36. Some also filled in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). An orthopaedic surgeon completed the American Knee Society (AKS) clinical score. The single score derived from the new questionnaire had high internal consistency, and its reproducibility, examined by test-retest reliability, was found to be satisfactory. Its validity was established by obtaining significant correlations in the expected direction with the AKS scores and the relevant parts of the SF36 and HAQ. Sensitivity to change was assessed by analysing the differences between the preoperative scores and those at follow-up. We also compared change in scores with the patients' retrospective judgement of change in their condition. The effect size for the new questionnaire compared favourably with those for the relevant parts of the SF36. The change scores for the new knee questionnaire were significantly greater (p < 0.0001) for patients who reported the most improvement in their condition. The new questionnaire provides a measure of outcome for TKR that is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9460955     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  452 in total

1.  The Italian version of the Oxford 12-item Knee Questionnaire-cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

Authors:  R Padua; G Zanoli; E Ceccarelli; E Romanini; R Bondì; A Campi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?

Authors:  Sébastien Lustig; Robert A Magnussen; Diane L Dahm; David Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Health status after hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Jinks; M Lewis; P Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Custom-made rotating hinge total knee replacement in a patient with congenital tibial deficiency avoids the need for amputation.

Authors:  A McGrath; M D Sewell; G Datta; G W Blunn; T W R Briggs; S R Cannon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The potential utility of patient-reported range of motion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jack Weick; Harpreet S Bawa
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

7.  Prevalence and Factors Associated with Frailty and Cognitive Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Elderly with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kulthanit Wanaratna; Weerasak Muangpaisan; Vilai Kuptniratsaikul; Chalobol Chalermsri; Apiwan Nuttamonwarakul
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2019-06

8.  Anteroposterior glide versus rotating platform low contact stress (LCS) knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gayle Walley; Sandeep Datir; Murali Sayana; Aziz Rahmatalla; Ian Dos Remedios; Charles Wynn-Jones; Stephen Bridgman; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision.

Authors:  I Jahromi; N P Walton; P J Dobson; P L Lewis; D G Campbell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Helen Doll; Irene Boller; Ray Fitzpatrick; Christopher Little; Jonathan Rees; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.