Literature DB >> 32600136

The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty.

H Dakin1, P Eibich1,2, D Beard3, A Gray1, A Price3.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess how the cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) varies with age, sex, and preoperative Oxford Hip or Knee Score (OHS/OKS); and to identify the patient groups for whom THA/TKA is cost-effective.
METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model from a United Kingdom NHS perspective, informed by published analyses of patient-level data. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of THA and TKA in adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis compared with having no arthroplasty surgery during the ten-year time horizon.
RESULTS: THA and TKA cost < £7,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained at all preoperative scores below the absolute referral thresholds calculated previously (40 for OHS and 41 for OKS). Furthermore, THA cost < £20,000/QALY for patients with OHS of ≤ 45, while TKA was cost-effective for patients with OKS of ≤ 43, since the small improvements in quality of life outweighed the cost of surgery and any subsequent revisions. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that there is little uncertainty around the conclusions.
CONCLUSION: If society is willing to pay £20,000 per QALY gained, THA and TKA are cost-effective for nearly all patients who currently undergo surgery, including all patients at and above our calculated absolute referral thresholds. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):950-958.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Cost-utility analysis; Economic evaluation; Hip; Joint arthroplasty; Knee; Osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32600136      PMCID: PMC7376304          DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-0105.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  17 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Populating an economic model with health state utility values: moving toward better practice.

Authors:  Roberta Ara; John E Brazier
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 3.  Health economic evaluation: a primer for the practicing rheumatologist.

Authors:  Michael C Y Tan; Dean A Regier; John M Esdaile; Larry D Lynd; Aslam H Anis; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-08-15

4.  The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Sujin Kang; Jonathan A Cook; Helen Dakin; Ashley Blom; Nigel Arden; Ray Fitzpatrick; David J Beard
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

6.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Lifetime cost effectiveness of different brands of prosthesis used for total hip arthroplasty: a study using the NJR dataset.

Authors:  M W Pennington; R Grieve; J H van der Meulen
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 8.  Cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions for the management of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hanin Kamaruzaman; Philip Kinghorn; Raymond Oppong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Impact of total knee replacement practice: cost effectiveness analysis of data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Bart S Ferket; Zachary Feldman; Jing Zhou; Edwin H Oei; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Madhu Mazumdar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-03-28

10.  Rationing of total knee replacement: a cost-effectiveness analysis on a large trial data set.

Authors:  Helen Dakin; Alastair Gray; Ray Fitzpatrick; Graeme Maclennan; David Murray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  7 in total

1.  The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Sujin Kang; Jonathan A Cook; Helen Dakin; Ashley Blom; Nigel Arden; Ray Fitzpatrick; David J Beard
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  The metabolic equivalent of task score : a useful metric for comparing high-functioning hip arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Thomas C Edwards; Brogan Guest; Amy Garner; Kartik Logishetty; Alexander D Liddle; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.410

3.  Who gets referred for knee or hip replacement? A theoretical model of the potential impact of evidence-based referral thresholds using data from a retrospective review of clinic records from an English musculoskeletal referral hub.

Authors:  Helen A Dakin; Peter Eibich; Alastair Gray; James Smith; Karen L Barker; David Beard; Andrew J Price
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yiou Wang; Meihua Yin; Shibai Zhu; Xi Chen; Hongru Zhou; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lindsay K Smith; Cesar Garriga; Sarah R Kingsbury; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; Antonella Delmestri; Nigel K Arden; Martin Stone; Philip G Conaghan; Andrew Judge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The Oxford Knee Score is a reliable predictor of patients in a health state worse than death and awaiting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; I Afzal; P Liu; K M Phoon; V Asopa; D H Sochart; D F Kader
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-08-03

7.  Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Injection (MFAT) May Be a Solution to the Rationing of Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective, Gender-Bias Mitigated, Reproducible Analysis at Two Years.

Authors:  Nima Heidari; Tiffanie-Marie Borg; Stefano Olgiati; Mark Slevin; Alessandro Danovi; Brady Fish; Adrian Wilson; Ali Noorani
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.443

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.