Riahna Kembaren1,2, Remco Fokkink1, Adrie H Westphal2, Marleen Kamperman3, J Mieke Kleijn1, Jan Willem Borst2. 1. Physical Chemistry and Soft Matter, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands. 2. Laboratory of Biochemistry, Microspectroscopy Research Facility, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, Netherlands. 3. Zernike Institute for Advanced Research, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
Encapsulation of charged proteins into complex coacervate core micelles (C3Ms) can be accomplished by mixing them with oppositely charged diblock copolymers. However, these micelles tend to disintegrate at high ionic strength. Previous research showed that the addition of a homopolymer with the same charge sign as the protein improved the stability of protein-containing C3Ms. In this research, we used fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) to study how the addition of the homopolymer affects the encapsulation efficiency and salt stability of the micelles. We studied the encapsulation of laccase spore coat protein A (CotA), a multicopper oxidase, using a strong cationic-neutral diblock copolymer, poly(N-methyl-2-vinyl-pyridinium iodide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (PM2VP128-b-PEO477), and a negatively charged homopolymer, poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS215). DLS indeed showed an improved stability of this three-component C3M system against the addition of salt compared to a two-component system. Remarkably, FCS showed that the release of CotA from a three-component C3M system occurred at a lower salt concentration and over a narrower concentration range than the dissociation of C3Ms. In conclusion, although the addition of the homopolymer to the system leads to micelles with a higher salt stability, CotA is excluded from the C3Ms already at lower ionic strengths because the homopolymer acts as a competitor of the enzyme for encapsulation.
Encapsulation of charged proteins into complex coacervate core micelles (C3Ms) can be accomplished by mixing them with oppositely charged diblock copolymers. However, these micelles tend to disintegrate at high ionic strength. Previous research showed that the addition of a homopolymer with the same charge sign as the protein improved the stability of protein-containing C3Ms. In this research, we used fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) to study how the addition of the homopolymer affects the encapsulation efficiency and salt stability of the micelles. We studied the encapsulation of laccase spore coat protein A (CotA), a multicopper oxidase, using a strong cationic-neutral diblock copolymer, poly(N-methyl-2-vinyl-pyridinium iodide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (PM2VP128-b-PEO477), and a negatively charged homopolymer, poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS215). DLS indeed showed an improved stability of this three-component C3M system against the addition of salt compared to a two-component system. Remarkably, FCS showed that the release of CotA from a three-component C3M system occurred at a lower salt concentration and over a narrower concentration range than the dissociation of C3Ms. In conclusion, although the addition of the homopolymer to the system leads to micelles with a higher salt stability, CotA is excluded from the C3Ms already at lower ionic strengths because the homopolymer acts as a competitor of the enzyme for encapsulation.
Complex coacervate
core micelles (C3Ms) can be formed by mixing
a diblock copolymer composed of a neutral block and a charged block
with an oppositely charged polyelectrolyte or a charged biomolecule,
such as DNA,[1] RNA,[2] or protein.[3,4,45] The
oppositely charged parts bind electrostatically to form an almost
electroneutral coacervate. This coacervate forms the core of the micelle,
surrounded by a corona consisting of the neutral hydrophilic parts
of the diblock copolymer, which keeps the micelles in solution.[5] C3Ms can be used for a wide variety of applications,
for example, as nanoreactors,[6] diffusional
nanoprobes,[7] anti-biofouling coatings,[8] and drug delivery systems.[9] Advantages of C3Ms as a packing system for proteins are
their solubility in aqueous solution, that many protein molecules
can be encapsulated in one micelle,[3] and
that they offer opportunities for controlled release.[10] Encapsulation of proteins can protect them against detrimental
environmental effects and protease activity, and enzyme-containing
C3Ms can be used as a microreactor to overcome incompatibility problems
between polar enzymes and nonpolar substrates.[11]For the encapsulation of a protein in C3Ms, the total
protein charge
and charge distribution over its surface are very important and are
dependent upon the amino acid composition, structure, and pH of the
surrounding solution.[4] In addition, because
of the hydrophobic nature of various amino acid residues, the formation
of protein-containing C3Ms may not only be driven by electrostatic
interactions and entropy gain as a result of counterion release[12] but hydrophobic interactions may also contribute
significantly.[13]One of the most
significant challenges regarding the use of C3Ms
as packing systems for proteins is that they easily disintegrate,
often as a result of the low charge density of proteins. Lindhoud
et al. showed, using dynamic light scattering (DLS), that the most
stable enzyme-containing C3Ms could be obtained by adding a homopolymer
with the same charge sign as the protein to the two-component system,
in excess over the protein concentration.[14] Research from Black et al. showed that bovine serum albumin (BSA)
could be encapsulated in coacervate droplets of two oppositely charged
polypeptides. However, increasing the ratio of BSA to the total amount
of polypeptides in the system led to a less than linear increase of
BSA in the coacervate, as observed using a Bradford colorimetric assay.[15] This illustrates the need for further investigation
of three-component coacervate systems for protein encapsulation, studied
using additional techniques, as already suggested by Blocher and Perry.[16]In 2010, Gapinski et al. showed that the
relatively novel technique
of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) could be used to measure
micellar sizes and shapes.[17] Research of
Nolles et al. showed that DLS and FCS provided similar results concerning
the hydrodynamic radius and preferred micellar composition (PMC) of
two-component C3Ms that contained green fluorescent protein (GFP).[45] In addition, FCS enabled them to obtain the
distribution of protein over micelles and solution and the number
of protein molecules incorporated per micelle.[3] In comparison to DLS, FCS has a relatively low background noise
as a result of the Stokes shift of the fluorescence emission and measurements
can be conducted at very low (nanomolar) concentrations. Furthermore,
FCS has a selectivity that allows for the measurement of specific
fluorescent molecules in systems.[18] On
the other hand, FCS experiments and analysis are more labor-intensive
than DLS measurements, and often fluorescence labeling of biomolecules
is required.The spore coat protein A (CotA) laccase is the
model enzyme of
the present study. CotA is originally found in the outer coat layer
of the Bacillus subtilis endospore.[19] CotA has an isoelectric point (pI) at pH 5.84
and a molar weight of 65 kDa. It is a multicopper oxidase (MCO), characterized
by the presence of four copper ions[20] (Figure ). These four copper
ions are classified into three categories based on the ultraviolet/visible
(UV/vis) and electronic paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra, denoted
as type 1 (T1), type 2 (T2), and type 3 (T3).[21] The T1Cu ion is responsible for the intense blue color of the enzyme,
and its absorption can be detected around 600 nm. The T2 and two T3
Cu ions form the trinuclear center (TNC) in the protein structure.[22] CotA can catalyze the oxidation of a wide variety
of substrates using dioxygen as an electron acceptor. Substrate oxidation
occurs at the T1 binding pocket, and the electrons are then transferred
to the TNC, where the reduction of dioxygen occurs.[23,24] CotA has a region of positive charge on its surface at the interface
between domains 1, 2, and 3, including 10 lysine and 5 arginine amino
acid residues.[25] The biological function
of this positively charged patch is its involvement in the assembly
of CotA into the spore outer coat layer.[6]
Figure 1
(A)
CotA wild-type structure. Cu atoms are represented as spheres
colored in brown. The protein contains one disulfide bridge, which
is represented as a red line. (B) Copper coordination in the CotA
laccase structure.[23,28]
(A)
CotA wild-type structure. Cu atoms are represented as spheres
colored in brown. The protein contains one disulfide bridge, which
is represented as a red line. (B) Copper coordination in the CotA
laccase structure.[23,28]Some types of laccases have already been used as a model to study
enzyme immobilization. For example, Pich et al. used laccase from
fungus in their study of composite magnetic particles as enzyme carriers,[26] while Bryjak et al. immobilized laccase from
fungus by covalently binding it to a copolymer of butyl acrylate and
ethylene glycol dimethacrylate.[27] However,
thus far, laccases have not been used to study encapsulation in complex
coacervate core micelles. In this research, we studied the stability
and encapsulation efficiency of CotA containing C3Ms. We show that
a combination of DLS and FCS data is necessary to optimize the balance
between micelle stability and encapsulation efficiency.
Experimental Section
Materials
2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic
acid) (ABTS) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The probe Alexa Fluor
C5 maleimide (Alexa488) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
The diblock copolymer poly(2-vinylpyridinium iodide)128-block-poly(ethylene oxide)477 (Mn = 34.5 kg/mol; Mw/Mn = 1.1) was obtained from Polymer
Source, Inc., Canada. This diblock copolymer then was quaternized
with iodomethane following the procedure described by Lindhoud et
al.[29] The quaternization degree was about
70% as measured by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
(see Figure S1 of the Supporting Information).[30] The homopolymerpoly(4-styrenesulfonate)215 (M = 43 kg/mol; Mw/Mn = 1.03; degree
of sulfonation of about 90%) was purchased from Polymer Source, Inc.,
Canada.
CotA Production
The production and purification of
CotA were performed following the procedure described by Martins et
al.[19] The CotA gene was cloned into a pLOM
10 vector and heterologously expressed in Escherichia
coli Rosetta cells. The induction of CotA laccase
expression was performed by adding 0.1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 0.25 mM CuSO4 at 25
°C. The purification of CotA laccase was performed using cation-exchange
chromatography (cIEX using a SP-Sepharose FF column from GE Healthcare)
and gel filtration chromatography (Superdex 200 column from GE Healthcare).A variant of CotA was obtained by replacing a serine at position
313 in the amino acid sequence by a cysteine (CotAS313C). Copper
is an oxidation catalyst that can promote the oxidation of free sulfhydryl
in cysteine of CotAS313C. Because of that reason, for this variant,
apoenzyme was produced, i.e., without the addition of 0.25 mM CuSO4 during induction.[31] The CotA-containing
fractions from cIEX were pooled and subsequently labeled with Alexa
Fluor 488 C5 maleimide with a molar ratio of 1:10 at 4 °C by
incubation in the dark for 16 h. Next, the mixture was loaded to a
Biogel-P6DG gel filtration column (BioRad) to separate the labeled
protein from the unreacted label. The fractions that showed fluorescence
and contained protein were pooled and concentrated using an Amicon
concentrator (cutoff of 10 kDa). The pooled concentrated enzyme was
then loaded to a gel filtration column (Superdex 200 column). The
fractions that showed absorptions at both 280 and 490 nm were collected
and concentrated. The purity of labeled CotA was analyzed using sodium
dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE)
analysis.
pH Stability of CotA: Enzyme Activity Test and Circular Dichroism
(CD)
For the activity assay (standard assay), we used 1 mM
ABTS as a substrate for CotA. The assay was performed in 0.1 M sodium
acetate buffer at pH 4.4. The oxidation product, the green-colored
cationic radical (ABTS• +), was
measured spectrophotometrically at 420 nm (ε = 36 000
M–1 cm–1). A total of 1 unit of
laccase activity was defined as the amount of laccase that oxidized
1 μmol of ABTS per minute at 25 °C.To determine
the stability of CotA at different pH values, the buffer of the enzyme
solution was exchanged with buffers of pH 7.6, 9.0, and 10.8 at 4
°C. The enzyme solutions were incubated at the three pH values
and room temperature and sampled every 5 min up to a total of 1 h.
The samples were assayed using the standard assay. Next to the activity
measurements, we also performed CD spectroscopy at the three pH values,
after incubation for 1 h, to determine any secondary structure changes
of CotA. CD experiments were performed on a JASCO J-715 spectropolarimeter
with a Jasco PTC 348 WI temperature controller. The far-UV CD spectra
were recorded from 200 to 260 nm at 25 °C. The sample was loaded
into a quartz cuvette with an optical path length of 1 mm. A total
of 20 spectra, each recorded with a resolution of 1 nm and a scan
speed of 50 nm/min, were accumulated and averaged.
Preparation
of Protein-Containing C3Ms
Enzyme and polymer
solutions containing 10 mM sodium carbonate buffer were prepared,
with a final pH of 10.8. All of the solutions were filtered using
a 0.2 μm poly(ether sulfone) membrane syringe filter (Advanced
Microdevices Pvt. Ltd.). The PMC of the two-component C3Ms was determined
by mixing a constant concentration of CotA with different concentrations
of PM2PV-b-PEO. DLS measurements were performed to
determine at which charge composition optimal micelle formation took
place.The amino acid sequence of CotA and the pH value of the
buffer determine to a great extent the net charge of the enzyme. The
pH–charge profile can be calculated from the three-dimensional
structure of the protein using the PROPKA 3.1 software package.[3,32] Using this approach, we determined a net charge for CotA of about
−41 at pH 10.8 (see Figure S2 of
the Supporting Information). PM2PV-b-PEO has a pH-independent
charge of about +90. To form three-component micelles, the homopolymer
PSS, which has a charge of about −188, was added to CotA solutions
with a charge concentration 2, 4, or 6 times higher than that of CotA.
To find the PMC for each of these cases, different concentrations
of PM2PV-b-PEO were added to the CotA–PSS
mixtures, and using DLS, the charge composition at which optimal micelle
formation took place was determined.Two- and three-component
C3M solutions were prepared at their PMCs
and stored at room temperature overnight before measurements. To monitor
the salt stability of the C3Ms, a 4 M solution of NaCl was titrated
to enzyme-containing micelles at their PMCs and observed by both DLS
and FCS.
DLS
DLS was performed with an ALV instrument equipped
with a DPSS laser operating at 660 nm. All measurements were performed
at a scattering angle of 90° to determine the PMC, hydrodynamic
radius, and polydispersity index (PDI). Multi-angle DLS was performed
to determine the shape of the protein-containing C3Ms. The laser power
used was 100 mW. The hydrodynamic radius Rh was calculated from the diffusion coefficient D,[46] obtained from the autocorrelation
function by cumulant CONTIN analysis, and using the Stokes–Einstein
equation, assuming spherical particles:where kB is the
Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature,
and η is the viscosity of the solution.
FCS
FCS was performed
using a Leica TCS SP8 X system
equipped with a 63 × 1.2 NA water immersion objective and a supercontinuum
laser. CotA labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 was excited by selecting
the 488 nm laser line with a pulse frequency of 40 MHz. Fluorescence
was collected through a size-adjustable pinhole, set at 1 Airy unit,
and filtered using a 495–525 nm spectral filter using a hybrid
detector coupled to a PicoHarp 300 TCSPC module (PicoQuant). FCS data
were analyzed with software FFS data processor, version 2.3 (Scientific
Software Technologies Software Centre, Belarus), using a two-component
three-dimensional (3D) diffusion model including a triplet state.[33] Rhodamine 110, which has a diffusion coefficient
of 4.3 × 10–10 m2 s–1, was used to determine the confocal structure parameter (a = ω/ω, where ω and
ω are the equatorial and axial
radii of the detection volume, respectively).In FCS, fluorescent
particles move in and out of the confocal volume, causing intensity
fluctuations. These intensity fluctuations can be correlated with
an autocorrelation function as follows:where G(t) is the normalized fluorescence
fluctuation autocorrelation function, I is the fluorescence
intensity, and ΔI(t) is the
deviation of the average signal intensity
at time t.After excitation, intersystem crossing
may occur, i.e., the transition
of a fluorophore from the singlet state to the triplet state. Relaxation
from the triplet state to the ground state can occur without emission
of photons, and as a result, the fluorophore appears to be dark for
a short interval. For autocorrelation analysis, this phenomenon needs
to be considered because intersystem crossing to the triplet state
may lead to an additional shoulder on the microsecond time scale.[34] For autocorrelation analysis, including the
triplet state, the following equation applies:where ⟨N⟩ is
the average number of fluorescent particles in the confocal volume,
τtrip is the average time that a fluorophore resides
in the triplet state, and τdif is the diffusion time
of the fluorophore in the confocal volume. From the diffusion time,
the diffusion coefficient D can be calculated using
the following equation:
Activity and Secondary Structure of the Encapsulated
Enzyme
The activity of CotA-containing C3Ms was measured
using the ABTS
assay, and the protein secondary structure was determined using far-UV
CD, as described above. During measurements, the temperature was kept
to 25 °C. For each sample, the far-UV CD spectrum was recorded
between 200 and 260 nm.
Results and Discussion
pH Stability of CotA: Enzyme
Activity and Secondary Structure
To encapsulate CotA in C3Ms
using a positively charged diblock
copolymer, a high pH of 10.8 was chosen to establish a sufficient
negative charge on the enzyme and to eliminate the effect of the positively
charged patch on its surface.The activity of CotA as a function
of the incubation time at different pH values is presented in Figure . It shows that CotA
laccase activity does not depend upon the time of incubation and is
an alkali-resistant enzyme. As described in the Introduction, the active site of CotA involves Cu ions; incubation of the enzyme
at high pH results in an increase of the redox potential of CotA,
where T1Cu in the enzyme will have a higher tendency to gain electrons
from the substrate, speeding up the catalytic cycle.[35] The incubation at high pH may also increase the reduction
rate of the oxidized trinuclear cluster, which then becomes faster
available again for further reaction with O2.[36,37]
Figure 2
Specific
activity of CotA measured at pH 4.4 after incubation of
the enzyme at different pH values (●, pH 10.8; ▲, pH
9.0; and ■, pH 7.6) as a function of the incubation time at
25 °C.
Specific
activity of CotA measured at pH 4.4 after incubation of
the enzyme at different pH values (●, pH 10.8; ▲, pH
9.0; and ■, pH 7.6) as a function of the incubation time at
25 °C.The CD spectra presented in Figure show that the secondary
structure of CotA laccase
is not significantly affected by incubation at high pH; the functional
conformation of the enzyme is maintained, despite the deprotonation
of amino acid residues at alkaline pH.
Figure 3
CD spectra
of CotA measured after incubation for 1 h at different
pH values measured at the pH of incubation (orange line, pH 10.8;
gray line, pH 9.0; and blue line, pH 7.6).
CD spectra
of CotA measured after incubation for 1 h at different
pH values measured at the pH of incubation (orange line, pH 10.8;
gray line, pH 9.0; and blue line, pH 7.6).
Two-component complex coacervate core micelles were obtained by mixing
CotA with PM2PV128-b-PEO477. At neutral pH, CotA has a highly positive patch on its surface
as a result of 10 lysines and 5 arginines that are located at the
interface between domains 1, 2, and 3,[23] while the net charge of the CotA molecules is negative (−10).
At low ionic strengths, this can lead to electrostatic protein–protein
interactions. Adding the diblock copolymer PM2PV-b-PEO to the protein solution at neutral pH led to the formation of
heterogeneous large aggregates and precipitation (data not shown).
For the formation of C3Ms, it is therefore essential to decrease the
charge anisotropy of the protein by neutralization of the lysine residues
in the protein by increasing the pH.[13]At pH 10.8, the formation of C3Ms consisting of CotA and PM2PV-b-PEO was successful. At this pH, the net charge on the
protein amounts to −41. The charge composition of the system
can be described by partition coefficient F– according to the equationwhere n– = c–N– and n+ = c+N+, i.e., the total concentration of
negative charges and the total concentration of positive charges on
the two types of macromolecules, respectively, where c is their molar concentrations and N is the number
of charged groups per molecule.To determine the PMC, usually
a solution with a constant amount
of polyelectrolyte or charged biomolecule is mixed with increasing
amounts of diblock copolymer. At the PMC, the concentration of micelles
reaches a maximum, and using DLS, this can be detected as a maximum
in light scattering intensity.[47] When F– is far from the PMC, the interaction
between the polyelectrolyte (biomolecule) and oppositely charged diblock
would only produce a limited number of small soluble complexes, resulting
in low light scattering intensities.[8,3]DLS measurements
on solutions with varying charge compositions
(mixing ratios) show the highest intensity at F– = 0.5 (Figure A), implying that the PMC corresponds to equal concentrations
of positive and negative charges on the diblock and the protein. At
the PMC, the scattering objects have a hydrodynamic radius of 34.0
± 0.8 nm (Figure B). At the PMC, a minimum in the PDI is found (Figure C), indicating a narrow size distribution
of the formed micelles.
Figure 4
DLS results for mixtures of CotA and PM2PV128-b-PEO477 as a function of the
charge composition F–: (A) scattering
intensity (I), (B) hydrodynamic radius (Rh), and (C) PDI.
DLS results for mixtures of CotA and PM2PV128-b-PEO477 as a function of the
charge composition F–: (A) scattering
intensity (I), (B) hydrodynamic radius (Rh), and (C) PDI.The shape of the micelles can be determined using multi-angle DLS.
At each detection angle, the decay rate Γ of the DLS correlation
function is determined by means of cumulant fits. From Figure , it can be seen that Γ
fitted with the first, second, and third cumulants as a function of
the squared wave vector (q2) gives three
overlapping straight lines, showing that the C3Ms are spherical and
monodisperse.[38] The slope of the lines
equals the diffusion coefficient.
Figure 5
Multi-angle DLS results for two-component
enzyme-containing C3Ms.
Decay rate Γ (q) obtained from the DLS correlation
curves by a first (blue), second (orange), and third (gray) cumulant
fit.
Multi-angle DLS results for two-component
enzyme-containing C3Ms.
Decay rate Γ (q) obtained from the DLS correlation
curves by a first (blue), second (orange), and third (gray) cumulant
fit.Activity measurements were performed
for samples with various mixing
ratios of CotA and diblock copolymer, where F– = 0 is only polymer and F– = 1 is only enzyme. Except for F– = 0, all samples had the same enzyme concentration. The activity
of CotA was found to be constant (Figure ) and similar to the activity of free enzyme
incubated at pH 10.8 (Figure ). It should be noted that the mixed samples were prepared
at pH 10.8, but the ABTS test was carried out at pH 4.4. At this lower
pH, CotA will be released from the micelles and then oxidize the substrate
ABTS. Packing and subsequent release from the C3Ms apparently did
not affect the activity of the enzyme. The
CD results (Figure ) confirmed that the secondary structure of the enzyme was maintained
when the enzyme was encapsulated in C3Ms.
Figure 6
Specific activity of
CotA measured after being encapsulated in
different charge ratios with the diblock copolymer.
Figure 7
CD spectra of two-component enzyme-containing C3Ms (orange line)
and the free enzyme (blue line).
Specific activity of
CotA measured after being encapsulated in
different charge ratios with the diblock copolymer.CD spectra of two-component enzyme-containing C3Ms (orange line)
and the free enzyme (blue line).
To obtain three-component micelles, the negatively charged homopolymerPSS215 was added to mixtures of CotA and PM2PV128-b-PEO477 with a charge concentration
2, 4, or 6 times higher than that of CotA. DLS measurements showed
that for all PSS/CotA charge concentration ratios, a maximum in light
scattering intensity was observed at an overall charge composition
of F– = 0.6 (Figure A), indicating that micelles are mostly formed
at this mixing composition. The deviation of the PMC from 0.5 suggests
that micelle formation is not only due to electrostatic interactions
and counterion release but that other interactions also play a role,
most likely hydrophobic interactions. CotA has several hydrophobic
residues at its surface with different levels of exposure. The polyelectrolytes
used in this study also have hydrophobic parts, i.e., the vinyl backbone
of PM2PV-b-PEO and the styrene group of PSS, and
these could be involved in protein–polyelectrolyte interactions.[13] It seems that hydrophobic interactions are more
important in the three-component micelles than in the two-component
micelles (PMC at F– = 0.5).
Figure 8
DLS results
for three-component C3Ms (with a PSS/CotA charge ratio
of 2:1) as a function of charge composition F–: (A) scattering intensity (I), (B)
hydrodynamic radius (Rh), and (C) PDI.
DLS results
for three-component C3Ms (with a PSS/CotA charge ratio
of 2:1) as a function of charge composition F–: (A) scattering intensity (I), (B)
hydrodynamic radius (Rh), and (C) PDI.At the PMC of the three-component C3Ms, the lowest
PDI was found
compared to other mixing ratios (Figure C). The hydrodynamic radii of the three-component
micelles are about 26.6 ± 0.5, 24.2 ± 0.2, and 23.6 ±
0.5 nm for 2, 4, and 6 times higher charge concentrations to CotA,
respectively (Figure B). Similar results were obtained upon changing the mixing order
of enzyme, homopolymer, and diblock copolymer (see Figures S4 and S5 of the Supporting
Information). The addition of the homopolymer results in smaller micelles
than the size of two-component C3Ms, which suggests that the amount
of encapsulated enzyme molecules per micelle is less in the three-component
C3Ms. As shown in Figure , multi-angle DLS results indicate that three-component C3Ms
also have a spherical shape and are fairly monodisperse, similar to
the two-component C3Ms.
Figure 9
Multi-angle DLS results for three-component
C3Ms with a PSS/CotA
charge ratio of 2. Decay rate Γ(q) obtained
from the DLS correlation curves by a first (blue), second (orange),
and third (gray) cumulant fit. Similar trend lines were also observed
for the PSS/CotA charge ratios of 4 and 6.
Multi-angle DLS results for three-component
C3Ms with a PSS/CotA
charge ratio of 2. Decay rate Γ(q) obtained
from the DLS correlation curves by a first (blue), second (orange),
and third (gray) cumulant fit. Similar trend lines were also observed
for the PSS/CotA charge ratios of 4 and 6.
FCS Analysis of Two- and Three-Component C3Ms
Native
CotA is not fluorescent in the visible spectrum; therefore, the CotAS313C variant was used for labeling with the fluorescent dye Alexa
Fluor 488 via a maleimide reaction and after purification (see Figure S3 of the Supporting Information), applied
in FCS experiments.[39]The two- and
three-component C3Ms were prepared using labeled CotA at their PMCs
obtained from the DLS measurements. FCS analysis allows for the discrimination
between CotA free in solution (small particles) and incorporated into
micelles (large particles) based on their different diffusion times.
In addition, the enzyme-containing C3Ms are much brighter than the
free enzyme molecules. The fluorescence intensity of the C3Ms is expected
to be proportional to the number of encapsulated proteins.The
normalized autocorrelation curves in Figure show a faster decay and, thus, a larger
diffusion coefficient for the solution that contained only fluorescently
labeled CotA than for the mixture of CotA and the diblock copolymer.
In addition, the number of fluorescent particles detected in the confocal
volume (N) was much higher for the solution without
the diblock copolymer (87 versus 3 particles; data not shown), with
a much lower fluorescence intensity. These results confirm the encapsulation
of labeled CotA in C3Ms upon mixing with PM2PV-b-PEO
and show that a large amount of CotA can be entrapped in the core
of the two-component C3Ms.
Figure 10
Autocorrelation curves obtained with FCS: (A)
not normalized G(t) and (B) normalized G(t). Blue curves represent free labeled
CotA, and
red curves represent the two-component C3Ms. Gray, yellow, and green
curves represent the three-component C3Ms made using 2-, 4-, and 6-fold
charge excess of PSS over CotA, respectively. The total CotA concentration
was identical in all samples.
Autocorrelation curves obtained with FCS: (A)
not normalized G(t) and (B) normalized G(t). Blue curves represent free labeled
CotA, and
red curves represent the two-component C3Ms. Gray, yellow, and green
curves represent the three-component C3Ms made using 2-, 4-, and 6-fold
charge excess of PSS over CotA, respectively. The total CotA concentration
was identical in all samples.The three-component systems also show a decrease in diffusion coefficients
compared to the free CotA, while N decreased from
87 to 20, 19, and 30 for PSS charge concentrations of 2, 4, and 6
times that of CotA, respectively. The amplitude of the autocorrelation
curve of the particles in the three-component systems is in between
the amplitude of the free labeled CotA and that of the two-component
C3Ms. These results show that CotA is also encapsulated in the three-component
C3Ms, with a lower amount of encapsulated enzyme molecules per micelle
than in the two-component system.Further analysis of the FCS
results revealed that free labeled
CotA has Rh of about 2.4 ± 0.2 nm.
In the two-component system, about 84% of the enzyme was present in
micelles, with a Rh of about 38 nm. The
three-component C3Ms appeared smaller, having a size of about 24 nm,
and here about 80% of the CotA is encapsulated in the core of micelles.
Apparently, there is no significant difference in encapsulation efficiency
among the three-component micelles made with different charge ratios
of CotA and PSS. This is probably because, for the samples with different
CotA/PSS ratios, the total CotA concentration was kept constant, while
the concentration of the diblock copolymer PM2PV-b-PEO was increased with the concentration of PSS to keep F– at −0.6 (the PMC). As a result,
more micelles are formed but with a lower amount of CotA per micelle.
The hydrodynamic radii found with FCS are similar to those obtained
with DLS.
Stability of Two- and Three-Component C3Ms against Salt
FCS can provide information on the fractions of CotA encapsulated
in C3Ms and free in solution, data that is not provided by DLS. We
used both techniques to monitor the change in stability of the enzyme-containing
C3Ms upon the addition of salt (NaCl). From the DLS results in Figure , it can be seen
that, by stepwise adding salt to the two-component C3M system, the
scattering intensity and the Rh of the
micelles gradually decrease. These phenomena occur because, upon increasing
the salt concentration, the electrostatic interactions become weaker
and the entropy gain from counterion release becomes smaller, leading
to a lower stability constant for C3M formation.[40] As a result, the micelles start to disintegrate.[41,48−51] The DLS data clearly show that the addition of the homopolymer improved
the salt stability of the protein-containing C3Ms. The more PSS present
in the system, the more resistant it is toward salt addition. We found
that, in the limiting case of an infinite ratio PSS/CotA, i.e., for
micelles consisting of only homopolymer PSS and diblock copolymer
PM2VP-b-PEO, the system was still stable at 1 M NaCl
(data not shown). This is in line with the observation of van der
Gucht et al. that, for mixtures of the polyelectrolytes PM2VP88 and PSS165, the critical salt concentration,
i.e., the salt concentration above which no coacervate phase is formed,
amounts to about 2 M (KCl).[44] We assume
the limit of the salt stability of the C3Ms with increasing the PSS
content is also well above 1.5 M salt.
Figure 11
Normalized DLS scattering
intensity for salt titration (NaCl) of
C3M solutions. Circles (red) represent the two-component C3MS of CotA
and the diblock copolymer. Triangles (black) represent micelles formed
only by the homopolymer and the diblock copolymer. Squares represent
three-component C3Ms made with 2 (gray), 4 (yellow), and 6 (green)
time charge excess of PSS over CotA.
Normalized DLS scattering
intensity for salt titration (NaCl) of
C3M solutions. Circles (red) represent the two-component C3MS of CotA
and the diblock copolymer. Triangles (black) represent micelles formed
only by the homopolymer and the diblock copolymer. Squares represent
three-component C3Ms made with 2 (gray), 4 (yellow), and 6 (green)
time charge excess of PSS over CotA.DLS data cannot provide changes in the number of CotA encapsulated
in C3Ms upon increasing the ionic strength. Therefore, we used FCS
as a read-out because this technique allows for distinguishing between
the fraction of the free enzyme (fraction 1) and the fraction of the
enzyme encapsulated in C3Ms in the confocal volume (fraction 2). With
the addition of salt, fraction 2 decreased, corresponding to an increase
in fraction 1. As shown in Figure , the total number of fluorescent particles detected
in the confocal volume (N) also increased upon stepwise
addition of salt, indicating the release of CotA as well. These results
clearly show that CotA was released from the three-component C3Ms
at a significantly lower salt concentration and over a narrower salt
concentration range than from the two-component C3Ms. Evidently, the
presence of PSS caused CotA to be expelled from the micelles upon
the addition of salt, even though the DLS results showed that the
micelles become more salt-resistant with the presence of PSS. Therefore,
the addition of the homopolymer with the same charge sign as the enzyme
is not an appropriate strategy for improving the stability of enzyme-containing
C3Ms in a high salt environment.
Figure 12
FCS analysis for salt titration of two-
and three-component C3Ms:
normalized number of particles N in the confocal
volume. Circles (red) represent the two-component C3MS of CotA and
the diblock copolymer. Squares represent three-component C3Ms made
with 2 (gray), 4 (yellow), and 6 (green) time charge excess of PSS
over CotA.
FCS analysis for salt titration of two-
and three-component C3Ms:
normalized number of particles N in the confocal
volume. Circles (red) represent the two-component C3MS of CotA and
the diblock copolymer. Squares represent three-component C3Ms made
with 2 (gray), 4 (yellow), and 6 (green) time charge excess of PSS
over CotA.An explanation for the FCS results
is that the attraction between
PM2PV-b-PEO and PSS is stronger than that between
PM2PV-b-PEO and CotA, because PSS has a much higher
charge density than CotA. Therefore, the homopolymer is preferably
taken up in the micelles, and only a relatively small amount of negatively
charged CotA contributes to the stoichiometry. When salt is added
to the micellar solution, the electrostatic interactions decrease
and especially the attraction between the protein and diblock copolymer
becomes very weak. Moreover, the enzyme is a bulky molecule with only
a few charges, and with the addition of small ions, it becomes entropically
no longer favorable to incorporate the enzyme in the C3Ms.[42] As a result, the enzyme is expelled from the
complex coacervate core and replaced by a homopolymer.[43]Adding salt to C3M solutions also affects
the micellar dynamics.
With increasing the ionic strength, intermolecular exchange processes
will be faster as well as rearrangements in the micellar core.[52,3] This facilitates the replacement of CotA by PSS.
Conclusion
Using DLS and FCS, we showed that, at high pH (10.8), the enzyme
CotA can be encapsulated with the diblock copolymer PM2PV-b-PEO into complex coacervate core micelles. At neutral
pH, micelle formation does not take place, most likely because of
the low net negative charge of the enzyme and the presence of a positively
charged patch on its surface. To improve the salt stability of the
micelles, the negatively charged homopolymer PSS was added to create
three-component C3Ms. The three-component C3Ms are smaller (hydrodynamic
radius of 24 versus 32 nm for the two-component system), and FCS measurements
showed that, per micelle, less CotA is encapsulated, although the
fraction of enzyme that is encapsulated is still high (80 versus 84%).
DLS measurements confirmed that the three-component C3Ms are indeed
more salt-resistant than the two-component C3Ms. However, FCS analysis
revealed that CotA is expelled from the three-component C3Ms already
at relatively low salt concentrations.From our results, it
is clear that FCS experiments are vital to
obtain insight into the composition and salt stability of the three-component
C3Ms, because this technique enables discrimination between free CotA
and encapsulated CotA. From these analyses, it can be concluded that
adding a homopolymer with the same charge sign as the protein is not
a good strategy to improve the salt stability of protein-containing
C3Ms. We suggest that it is important to increase the charge density
of the enzyme by the bioconjugation technique, and then enzyme-containing
C3Ms become more salt-resistant.
Authors: Victor V Skakun; Mark A Hink; Anatoli V Digris; Ruchira Engel; Eugene G Novikov; Vladimir V Apanasovich; Antonie J W G Visser Journal: Eur Biophys J Date: 2005-02-12 Impact factor: 1.733
Authors: Hanne M van der Kooij; Evan Spruijt; Ilja K Voets; Remco Fokkink; Martien A Cohen Stuart; Jasper van der Gucht Journal: Langmuir Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Nayan P Agarwal; Michael Matthies; Fatih N Gür; Kensuke Osada; Thorsten L Schmidt Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Paulo Durão; Zhenjia Chen; André T Fernandes; Peter Hildebrandt; Daniel H Murgida; Smilja Todorovic; Manuela M Pereira; Eduardo P Melo; Lígia O Martins Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Julien Es Sayed; Hugo Brummer; Marc C A Stuart; Nicolas Sanson; Patrick Perrin; Marleen Kamperman Journal: ACS Macro Lett Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 6.903