Literature DB >> 32595269

Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.

Gabriella M Najm1, Angelika Pe1, Jonathan N Pruitt2, Noa Pinter-Wollman1.   

Abstract

Animals often face conflicting demands when making movement decisions. To examine the decision process of social animals, we evaluated nest-site preferences of the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola. Colonies engage in collective web building, constructing 3D nests and 2D capture webs on trees and fences. We examined how individuals and groups decide where to construct a nest based on habitat structure and conspecific presence. Individuals had a strong preference for 3D substrates and conspecific presence. Groups were then provided with conflicting options of 3D substrates versus 2D substrates with a conspecific. Groups preferred the 3D structures without presettled conspecifics over a 2D substrate with conspecifics. When a group fragmented and individuals settled on both substrates, the minority group eventually joined the majority. Before rejoining, the collective prey capture behavior of divided groups improved with the size of the majority fragment. The costs of slow responses to prey for split groups and weak conspecific attraction may explain why dispersal is rare in these spiders.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collective behavior; conspecific attraction; decision-making; foraging; nest selection

Year:  2020        PMID: 32595269      PMCID: PMC7303816          DOI: 10.1093/beheco/araa003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol        ISSN: 1045-2249            Impact factor:   2.671


  26 in total

1.  Do ants make direct comparisons?

Authors:  Elva J H Robinson; Faith D Smith; Kathryn M E Sullivan; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Indirect cues of nest predation risk and avian reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Mikko Mönkkönen; Jukka T Forsman; Tiina Kananoja; Hannu Ylönen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Michael L Platt; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Ants adjust their pheromone deposition to a changing environment and their probability of making errors.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The multi-dimensional nature of information drives prioritization of private over social information in ants.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; John J Beckwith; Anna-Lena Horsch; Florian Hartig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.

Authors:  Ambika Kamath; Skylar D Primavera; Colin M Wright; Grant N Doering; Kirsten A Sheehy; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups.

Authors:  Noam Miller; Simon Garnier; Andrew T Hartnett; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences.

Authors:  Larissa Conradt
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Selection for Collective Aggressiveness Favors Social Susceptibility in Social Spiders.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Gregory T Chism; Brendan L McEwen; Ambika Kamath; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Group founding and breeding structure in the subsocial spider stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae)

Authors: 
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  1 in total

1.  Spatial proximity and prey vibratory cues influence collective hunting in social spiders.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Lauren P Luscuskie; Graham A Montgomery; Sara Geary; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Carl N Keiser
Journal:  Isr J Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 0.559

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.