Literature DB >> 23565335

Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences.

Larissa Conradt1.   

Abstract

Collective decision-making plays a central part in the lives of many social animals. Two important factors that influence collective decision-making are information uncertainty and conflicting preferences. Here, I bring together, and briefly review, basic models relating to animal collective decision-making in situations with information uncertainty and in situations with conflicting preferences between group members. The intention is to give an overview about the different types of modelling approaches that have been employed and the questions that they address and raise. Despite the use of a wide range of different modelling techniques, results show a coherent picture, as follows. Relatively simple cognitive mechanisms can lead to effective information pooling. Groups often face a trade-off between decision accuracy and speed, but appropriate fine-tuning of behavioural parameters could achieve high accuracy while maintaining reasonable speed. The right balance of interdependence and independence between animals is crucial for maintaining group cohesion and achieving high decision accuracy. In conflict situations, a high degree of decision-sharing between individuals is predicted, as well as transient leadership and leadership according to needs and physiological status. Animals often face crucial trade-offs between maintaining group cohesion and influencing the decision outcome in their own favour. Despite the great progress that has been made, there remains one big gap in our knowledge: how do animals make collective decisions in situations when information uncertainty and conflict of interest operate simultaneously?

Keywords:  collective decisions; game-theory models; self-organizing systems

Year:  2011        PMID: 23565335      PMCID: PMC3293206          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  41 in total

1.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1995-08-07       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses.

Authors:  K E Ruckstuhl; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2002-02

Review 3.  Self-organized fish schools: an examination of emergent properties.

Authors:  Julia K Parrish; Steven V Viscido; Daniel Grünbaum
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.818

4.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs.

Authors:  Sean A Rands; Guy Cowlishaw; Richard A Pettifor; J Marcus Rowcliffe; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Group decision-making in animals.

Authors:  L Conradt; T J Roper
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin; Jens Krause; Nigel R Franks; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective.

Authors:  Christian List
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Amé; José Halloy; Colette Rivault; Claire Detrain; Jean Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model.

Authors:  L Conradt; T J Roper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  23 in total

1.  A stochastic differential game approach toward animal migration.

Authors:  Hidekazu Yoshioka
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.

Authors:  Gabriella M Najm; Angelika Pe; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Towards the marriage of theory and data.

Authors:  Simon A Levin
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Collective animal decisions: preference conflict and decision accuracy.

Authors:  Larissa Conradt
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Fishing out collective memory of migratory schools.

Authors:  Giancarlo De Luca; Patrizio Mariani; Brian R MacKenzie; Matteo Marsili
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Division of labour promotes the spread of information in colony emigrations by the ant Temnothorax rugatulus.

Authors:  Gabriele Valentini; Naoki Masuda; Zachary Shaffer; Jake R Hanson; Takao Sasaki; Sara Imari Walker; Theodore P Pavlic; Stephen C Pratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Inferring influence and leadership in moving animal groups.

Authors:  Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin; Danai Papageorgiou; Margaret C Crofoot; Damien R Farine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Collective decision-making appears more egalitarian in populations where group fission costs are higher.

Authors:  J E Herbert-Read; A S I Wade; I W Ramnarine; C C Ioannou
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Strategic disinformation outperforms honesty in competition for social influence.

Authors:  Ralf H J M Kurvers; Uri Hertz; Jurgis Karpus; Marta P Balode; Bertrand Jayles; Ken Binmore; Bahador Bahrami
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-11-27

10.  Accurate decisions in an uncertain world: collective cognition increases true positives while decreasing false positives.

Authors:  Max Wolf; Ralf H J M Kurvers; Ashley J W Ward; Stefan Krause; Jens Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.