Literature DB >> 26063845

Ants adjust their pheromone deposition to a changing environment and their probability of making errors.

Tomer J Czaczkes1, Jürgen Heinze2.   

Abstract

Animals must contend with an ever-changing environment. Social animals, especially eusocial insects such as ants and bees, rely heavily on communication for their success. However, in a changing environment, communicated information can become rapidly outdated. This is a particular problem for pheromone trail using ants, as once deposited pheromones cannot be removed. Here, we study the response of ant foragers to an environmental change. Ants were trained to one feeder location, and the feeder was then moved to a different location. We found that ants responded to an environmental change by strongly upregulating pheromone deposition immediately after experiencing the change. This may help maintain the colony's foraging flexibility, and allow multiple food locations to be exploited simultaneously. Our treatment also caused uncertainty in the foragers, by making their memories less reliable. Ants which had made an error but eventually found the food source upregulated pheromone deposition when returning to the nest. Intriguingly, ants on their way towards the food source downregulated pheromone deposition if they were going to make an error. This may suggest that individual ants can measure the reliability of their own memories and respond appropriately.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lasius niger; environmental uncertainty; memory; metacognition; metamemory; pheromone trails

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063845      PMCID: PMC4590477          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  25 in total

1.  Insect communication: 'no entry' signal in ant foraging.

Authors:  Elva J H Robinson; Duncan E Jackson; Mike Holcombe; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Synergy between social and private information increases foraging efficiency in ants.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Christoph Grüter; Sam M Jones; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Composite collective decision-making.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Benjamin Czaczkes; Carolin Iglhaut; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Negative feedback in ants: crowding results in less trail pheromone deposition.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Christoph Grüter; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Metacognition in animals.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal; Allison L Foote
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009

6.  Stop signals provide cross inhibition in collective decision-making by honeybee swarms.

Authors:  Thomas D Seeley; P Kirk Visscher; Thomas Schlegel; Patrick M Hogan; Nigel R Franks; James A R Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A negative feedback signal that is triggered by peril curbs honey bee recruitment.

Authors:  James C Nieh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices.

Authors:  Clint J Perry; Andrew B Barron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  The trail less traveled: individual decision-making and its effect on group behavior.

Authors:  Michele C Lanan; Anna Dornhaus; Emily I Jones; Andrew Waser; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.

Authors:  Gabriella M Najm; Angelika Pe; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  A locally-blazed ant trail achieves efficient collective navigation despite limited information.

Authors:  Ehud Fonio; Yael Heyman; Lucas Boczkowski; Aviram Gelblum; Adrian Kosowski; Amos Korman; Ofer Feinerman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Social structure of perennial Vespula squamosa wasp colonies.

Authors:  Carl J Dyson; Henry G Crossley; Charles H Ray; Michael A D Goodisman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Active Inferants: An Active Inference Framework for Ant Colony Behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Ari Friedman; Alec Tschantz; Maxwell J D Ramstead; Karl Friston; Axel Constant
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  The Effect of Trail Pheromone and Path Confinement on Learning of Complex Routes in the Ant Lasius niger.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Tobias Weichselgartner; Abel Bernadou; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.