Literature DB >> 31431163

The multi-dimensional nature of information drives prioritization of private over social information in ants.

Tomer J Czaczkes1, John J Beckwith1,2, Anna-Lena Horsch1, Florian Hartig3.   

Abstract

When personally gathered and socially acquired information conflict, animals often prioritize private information. We propose that this is because private information often contains details that social information lacks. We test this idea in an ant model. Ants using a food source learn its location and quality rapidly (private information), whereas pheromone trails (social information) provide good directional information, but lack reliable information about food quality. If this lack is indeed responsible for the choice of memory over pheromone trails, adding information that better food is available should cause foragers to switch their priority to social information. We show it does: while ants follow memory rather than pheromones when they conflict, adding unambiguous information about a better potential food source (a 2 µl droplet of good food) reverses this pattern, from 60% of ants following their memory to 75% following the pheromone trail. Using fluorescence microscopy, we demonstrate that food (and thus information) flows from fed workers to outgoing foragers, explaining the frequent contacts of ants on trails. Ants trained to poor food that contact nest-mates fed with good food are more likely to follow a trail than ants which received information about poor food. We conclude that social information may often be ignored because it lacks certain crucial dimensions, suggesting that information content is crucial for understanding how and when animals prioritize social and private information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambiguity aversion; certainty effect; pheromone trails; social information; social insects; strategic information use

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31431163      PMCID: PMC6732386          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

Review 1.  Social learning strategies.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict.

Authors:  Yfke van Bergen; Isabelle Coolen; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Olfactory memory established during trophallaxis affects food search behaviour in ants.

Authors:  Yael Provecho; Roxana Josens
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Private information conflict: Lasius niger ants prefer olfactory cues to route memory.

Authors:  F B Oberhauser; A Schlemm; S Wendt; T J Czaczkes
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  The evolutionary basis of human social learning.

Authors:  T J H Morgan; L E Rendell; M Ehn; W Hoppitt; K N Laland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Isabelle Coolen; Yfke van Bergen; Rachel L Day; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Foraging Bumble Bees Weigh the Reliability of Personal and Social Information.

Authors:  Aimee S Dunlap; Matthew E Nielsen; Anna Dornhaus; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; M Sol Balbuena; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Individual crop loads provide local control for collective food intake in ant colonies.

Authors:  Efrat Esther Greenwald; Lior Baltiansky; Ofer Feinerman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.713

10.  Positive and negative incentive contrasts lead to relative value perception in ants.

Authors:  Stephanie Wendt; Kim S Strunk; Jürgen Heinze; Andreas Roider; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  4 in total

1.  Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.

Authors:  Gabriella M Najm; Angelika Pe; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.

Authors:  Stephanie Wendt; Nico Kleinhoelting; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Regulation of Ant Foraging: A Review of the Role of Information Use and Personality.

Authors:  Swetashree Kolay; Raphaël Boulay; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-28

4.  Ant Lasius niger joining one-way trails go against the flow.

Authors:  Yuta Sakamoto; Tomoko Sakiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.