Literature DB >> 34108848

Spatial proximity and prey vibratory cues influence collective hunting in social spiders.

Colin M Wright1, James L L Lichtenstein2, Lauren P Luscuskie2, Graham A Montgomery2, Sara Geary3, Jonathan N Pruitt4, Noa Pinter-Wollman5, Carl N Keiser6.   

Abstract

Social spiders are thought to predominantly receive information about their environment through vibrational cues. Thus, group living introduces the challenge of distinguishing useful vibrational information from the background noise of nestmates. Here we investigate whether spatial proximity between colony-mates may allow social spiders (Stegodyphus dumicola) to reduce background noise that might obstruct vibrational information from prey. To do so, we constructed experimental colonies and measured whether the number of spiders in proximity to one another whilst resting could predict the number of spiders that participated in prey capture. Additionally, we exposed spider colonies to five different simulated vibrational cues mimicking prey to determine which cue types spiders were most responsive to. We found that the number of spiders huddled together prior to foraging trials was positively correlated with the number of spiders participating in collective foraging. Furthermore, colonies responded more quickly to pulsed vibrational cues over other types of vibrational patterns. Together these data reveal that both social interactions and prey cues shape how social sit-and-wait predators experience and respond to their environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collective action; communication; foraging; seismic cues; sociality; spiders

Year:  2020        PMID: 34108848      PMCID: PMC8186555          DOI: 10.1163/22244662-20191062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isr J Ecol Evol        ISSN: 1565-9801            Impact factor:   0.559


  16 in total

1.  Competitive foraging in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Foraging decisions and behavioural flexibility in trap-building predators: a review.

Authors:  Inon Scharf; Yael Lubin; Ofer Ovadia
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2010-11-10

3.  Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies.

Authors:  Eric C Yip; Kimberly S Powers; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Warring arthropod societies: Social spider colonies can delay annihilation by predatory ants via reduced apparency and increased group size.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Colin M Wright; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Persistent social interactions beget more pronounced personalities in a desert-dwelling social spider.

Authors:  Andreas P Modlmeier; Kate L Laskowski; Alex E DeMarco; Anna Coleman; Katherine Zhao; Hayley A Brittingham; Donna R McDermott; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Selection for Collective Aggressiveness Favors Social Susceptibility in Social Spiders.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Gregory T Chism; Brendan L McEwen; Ambika Kamath; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Rediet Geremew; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Graham A Montgomery; Lauren P Luscuskie; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  The Effect of Keystone Individuals on Collective Outcomes Can Be Mediated through Interactions or Behavioral Persistence.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Carl N Keiser; Roy Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Individual and Group Performance Suffers from Social Niche Disruption.

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Pierre-Olivier Montiglio; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.367

View more
  1 in total

1.  A variable refractory period increases collective performance in noisy environments.

Authors:  Violette Chiara; Patrick Arrufat; Raphaël Jeanson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.