Literature DB >> 26976647

Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model.

Andrej Kral1, William G Kronenberger2, David B Pisoni2, Gerard M O'Donoghue3.   

Abstract

Progress in biomedical technology (cochlear, vestibular, and retinal implants) has led to remarkable success in neurosensory restoration, particularly in the auditory system. However, outcomes vary considerably, even after accounting for comorbidity-for example, after cochlear implantation, some deaf children develop spoken language skills approaching those of their hearing peers, whereas other children fail to do so. Here, we review evidence that auditory deprivation has widespread effects on brain development, affecting the capacity to process information beyond the auditory system. After sensory loss and deafness, the brain's effective connectivity is altered within the auditory system, between sensory systems, and between the auditory system and centres serving higher order neurocognitive functions. As a result, congenital sensory loss could be thought of as a connectome disease, with interindividual variability in the brain's adaptation to sensory loss underpinning much of the observed variation in outcome of cochlear implantation. Different executive functions, sequential processing, and concept formation are at particular risk in deaf children. A battery of clinical tests can allow early identification of neurocognitive risk factors. Intervention strategies that address these impairments with a personalised approach, taking interindividual variations into account, will further improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26976647      PMCID: PMC6260790          DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00034-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  95 in total

1.  Implicit sequence learning in deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; David B Pisoni; Esperanza M Anaya; Jennifer Karpicke; Shirley C Henning
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-01

Review 2.  Profound deafness in childhood.

Authors:  Andrej Kral; Gerard M O'Donoghue
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Identification of stimulus cues in narrow-band tone-in-noise detection using sparse observer models.

Authors:  Vinzenz H Schönfelder; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Auditory critical periods: a review from system's perspective.

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Effects of age on the temporal organization of working memory in deaf signers.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Lena Davidsson; Jerker Ronnberg
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-11-16

6.  Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn C Hughes; Karyn L Galvin
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-06

7.  Executive functioning and speech-language skills following long-term use of cochlear implants.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; Bethany G Colson; Shirley C Henning; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2014-06-05

Review 8.  Sound strategies for hearing restoration.

Authors:  Gwenaëlle S G Géléoc; Jeffrey R Holt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Developmental effects of family environment on outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Jessica Beer; William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Closing the achievement gap through modification of neurocognitive and neuroendocrine function: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of an innovative approach to the education of children in kindergarten.

Authors:  Clancy Blair; C Cybele Raver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  66 in total

1.  Visual sequential processing and language ability in children who are deaf or hard of hearing.

Authors:  Michelle A Gremp; Joanne A Deocampo; Anne M Walk; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2019-02-26

Review 2.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).

Authors:  Adrienne S Roman; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Auditory cortex interneuron development requires cadherins operating hair-cell mechanoelectrical transduction.

Authors:  Baptiste Libé-Philippot; Vincent Michel; Jacques Boutet de Monvel; Sébastien Le Gal; Typhaine Dupont; Paul Avan; Christine Métin; Nicolas Michalski; Christine Petit
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Age-related hearing loss increases full-brain connectivity while reversing directed signaling within the dorsal-ventral pathway for speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Benefits in noise from sound processor upgrade in thirty-three cochlear implant users for more than 20 years.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Olivier Sterkers; Yann Nguyen; Ghizlene Lahlou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Intracortical Microstimulation Modulates Cortical Induced Responses.

Authors:  Mathias Benjamin Voigt; Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Restoration of sensory input may improve cognitive and neural function.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Executive Function in Deaf Children: Auditory Access and Language Access.

Authors:  Matthew L Hall; Inge-Marie Eigsti; Heather Bortfeld; Diane Lillo-Martin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Auditory Deprivation Does Not Impair Executive Function, But Language Deprivation Might: Evidence From a Parent-Report Measure in Deaf Native Signing Children.

Authors:  Matthew L Hall; Inge-Marie Eigsti; Heather Bortfeld; Diane Lillo-Martin
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2016-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.