Literature DB >> 32550550

Inferring changes in histone modification during cell differentiation by ancestral state estimation based on phylogenetic trees of cell types: Human hematopoiesis as a model case.

Kanako O Koyanagi1.   

Abstract

Revealing the landscape of epigenetic changes in cells during differentiation is important for understanding the development of organisms. In this study, to infer such epigenetic changes during human hematopoiesis, ancestral state estimation based on a phylogenetic tree was applied to map the epigenomic changes in six kinds of histone modifications onto the hierarchical cell differentiation process of hematopoiesis using epigenomes of eight types of differentiated hematopoietic cells. The histone modification changes inferred during hematopoiesis showed that changes that occurred on the branches separating different cell types reflected the characteristics of hematopoiesis in terms of genomic position and gene function. These results suggested that ancestral state estimation based on phylogenetic analysis of histone modifications in differentiated hematopoietic cells could reconstruct an appropriate landscape of histone modification changes during hematopoiesis. Since integration of the inferred changes of different histone modifications could reveal genes with specific histone marks such as active histone marks and bivalent histone marks on each internal branch of cell-type trees, this approach could provide valuable information for understanding the cell differentiation steps of each cell lineage.
© 2019 The Author.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ancestral state estimation; B, B cell; BED, browser extensible data; CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat; Cell lineage; Cell-type tree; ChIP-seq, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; Eo, eosinophil; Er, erythroblast; H3K27ac, acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 27; H3K27me3, trimethylations of histone H3 at lysine 27; H3K36me3, trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 36; H3K4me1, monomethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4; H3K4me3, trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4; H3K9me3, trimethylations of histone H3 at lysine 9; Histone modification; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; L, lymphoid lineage; M, myeloid lineage; Me, megakaryocyte; Mo, monocyte; Ne, neutrophil; Nk, natural killer cell; Phyloepigenetics; T, T cell; TSS, transcription start sites; kb, kilobase(s)

Year:  2019        PMID: 32550550      PMCID: PMC7286071          DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.100021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene X        ISSN: 2590-1583


Introduction

Cell differentiation is regulated by transcription factors and epigenetic modifications, which influence gene expression patterns. To understand the process of cell differentiation, it is important to know the changes occurring in gene expression and epigenetic patterns of each cell lineage. However, comprehensively analyzing such changes in each cell lineage by experiments is laborious, and sometimes impossible, especially in vivo. Epigenetic changes that occur throughout cell differentiation might represent key features of the differentiation processes. Indeed, nucleosome patterns are suggested to represent cell types of hematopoietic cells better than gene expression patterns (Corces et al., 2016) likely because of the variable features of gene expression. Recently, it has been shown that phylogenetic analyses of DNA methylation patterns in differentiated cells can be used to infer hierarchical cell differentiation processes and the DNA methylation status of differentiating progenitor cells (Capra and Kostka, 2014; Koyanagi, 2015). Similar to phylogenetic trees that are used to analyze evolutionary relationships, cell differentiation pathways also form a tree, known as a cell-type tree, which represents the cell differentiation hierarchy (Kin, 2015). Thus, the same approaches employed to construct evolutionary trees can be used to infer cell differentiation processes. Especially, ancestral state estimation based on phylogenetic analysis has an advantage over other methods used to compare epigenomes of different cell types, such as the clustering method, because it allows inference of not only tree topology, corresponding to the cell differentiation hierarchy, but also ancestral states, corresponding to the epigenetic states of the differentiating progenitor cells. By comparing the epigenomes of adult differentiated cells, we could infer the epigenome landscape of each cell lineage. Like DNA methylation, histone modifications present another important type of epigenetic alteration. While DNA methylation mainly represses gene expression (Luo et al., 2018), histone modification is involved in both the activation and repression of gene expression (Zhou et al., 2011; Lawrence et al., 2016). Several types of histone modifications, including methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination at different sites of histone molecules, regulate their interaction with DNA and influence gene transcription. For example, monomethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me1) and acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27ac) in enhancer regions are associated with transcriptional activation, and trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and H3K27ac in promoter regions are also involved in transcriptional activation (Zhou et al., 2011; Lawrence et al., 2016). Further, trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3K36me3) in gene body regions is associated with transcription elongation, and trimethylations of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) and at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) are associated with facultative and constitutive transcriptional repression, respectively (Zhou et al., 2011; Lawrence et al., 2016). Therefore, genome-wide changes in histone modification provide clues about cell differentiation processes, which are regulated by gene expression (Meissner, 2010; Dambacher et al., 2013; Boland et al., 2014; Avgustinova and Benitah, 2016). Although how histone modifications are inherited through cell division is not as fully understood as is DNA methylation, histone modifications are stable during cell division (Almouzni and Cedar, 2016). Thus, phylogenetic analysis of histone modification could be useful for inferring the epigenome landscape in differentiating cells. Based on the histone modification data from ENCODE project (ENCODE Project Consortium, 2012), which sampled various cell types from the human body, Nair et al. showed that phylogenetic analysis can build biologically meaningful cell-type trees, in which cell types of the same origin are clustered in the phylogenetic tree (Nair et al., 2014; Nair, 2015). In this study, using ancestral state estimation based on phylogenetic trees of differentiated hematopoietic cells, six kinds of histone modifications of human hematopoietic cells were mapped onto the hierarchical cell differentiation process, in which histone modification plays an important role (Avgustinova and Benitah, 2016; Carrillo-de-Santa-Pau et al., 2017; Raghuwanshi et al., 2018). The aim of this study was to examine whether ancestral state estimation of histone modifications could be used to reconstruct the changing history of histone modification during hematopoiesis.

Materials and methods

Histone modification data

Genome-wide histone modification data for human hematopoietic cells were obtained from the latest eighth data release of the BLUEPRINT project (ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/). This dataset contains ChIP-seq analysis data for various histone modifications in hematopoietic cells, and the genomic regions with each histone modification are available in Browser Extensible Data (BED) format. For this study, all the available data of differentiated cells in blood having six histone modifications (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3) were used, which were derived from eight types of differentiated cells (erythroblasts, megakaryocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, monocytes, natural killer cells, T cells, and B cells) in blood. The data contain cells of the same type obtained from different tissues (venous blood, cord blood, tonsil, and bone marrow) and from different individuals (Supplementary Table 1). Samples whose ChIP-seq data are missing for at least one chromosome (except Y) were excluded from the analyses.

Ancestral state estimation based on phylogenetic analyses

Based on the BED files, genomic sites (nucleotides) with ChIP-seq signals were regarded as histone modification “ON”, and all other sites were regarded as histone modification “OFF”. Based on these binary ON/OFF sites corresponding to individual nucleotides, phylogenetic analyses were performed using the maximum parsimony method with PAUP 4.0 (Swofford, 2003). The character type was treated as undirected, with the cost of modification of “ON” being equal to that of “OFF”. Monophyly of the same cell types and the traditional hierarchical differentiation model, which is (((erythroblasts, megakaryocytes), ((eosinophils, neutrophils), monocytes)), (natural killer cells, T cells, B cells)), were assumed, although the traditional hierarchical model of hematopoiesis has become a matter of debate owing to recent technical advances (Laurenti and Göttgens, 2018). Other unfixed phylogenetic relationships were inferred by heuristic search with tree bisection-reconnection algorithm. The ancestral state for each node was inferred with accelerated transformation (ACCTRAN) and delayed transformation (DELTRAN) algorithms (Swofford and Maddison, 1987). Because results obtained from both algorithms were similar, those of ACCTRAN are shown in the main text.

Annotation analyses

To characterize histone modification sites, the ChIPseeker package (Yu et al., 2015) of R/Bioconductor was used with TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene as the human genome annotation database. Using the annotate Peak function of ChIPseeker, the genomic location of histone modification relative to transcription start sites (TSS) was assigned. To test genomic distribution differences between histone modifications on inter-type branches and those on intra-type branches, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was performed using ks.test function in R (3.4.1). For histone modifications associated with genes, functional enrichment analysis was performed using the compare cluster function of cluster Profiler package (Yu et al., 2012) of R/Bioconductor with KEGG pathway database (Kanehisa et al., 2004). P values <0.05 after correction with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure were considered to represent significant enrichment. The intersection of inferred histone modification sites with known genes in the human genome was analyzed using BEDTools (Quinlan and Hall, 2010) with genome annotation of GENCODE (Harrow et al., 2012) Release 22 downloaded from ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/reference/.

Results and discussion

Inferred histone modification changes mapped onto a cell-type tree

Human hematopoiesis, one of the best-studied cell differentiation processes, was used as the model case in this study. Hematopoietic stem cells give rise to myeloid and lymphoid lineages, producing various types of differentiated cells (Laurenti and Göttgens, 2018) (Fig. 1). For eight types of differentiated hematopoietic cells (erythroblasts, megakaryocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, and monocytes of the myeloid lineage, and natural killer cells, T cells, B cells of the lymphoid lineage), epigenome information regarding six histone modifications (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3) was obtained from ChIP-seq data of the BLUEPRINT project (Fernández et al., 2016). The samples of each cell type were obtained from different tissues, individuals, and subtypes making a total of 114, 122, 118, 83, 99, and 104 samples available for H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). Genomic sites (nucleotides) with ChIP-seq signals were regarded as histone modification “ON” sites, and genomic sites without ChIP-seq signals were regarded as histone modification “OFF” sites. The ancestral states (ON/OFF histone modification) at each site for each node for each histone modification were inferred based on a fixed tree topology, which corresponds to a well-known traditional hierarchical differentiation process (see Materials and methods for details; the tree topologies used for the inference for the six histone modifications are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1). In this study, branches were classified as either inter-type or intra-type branches (Fig. 1). Inter-type branches separate the eight hematopoietic cell types, while intra-type branches separate the same cell types obtained from different tissues and/or individuals as well as different subtypes of the same cell type (Supplementary Table 1). For the inference, the maximum parsimony method was used similar to that in previous studies where cell-type trees were inferred based on histone modification (Nair et al., 2014) and gene expression (Joshi and Göttgens, 2011; Kin et al., 2015). As a result, 878,349,583, 154,715,602, 388,431,451, 635,179,539, 932,000,779, and 1,048,771,872 variable sites (nucleotides) were available for H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3, respectively, and the history of histone modification changes at each site for each branch was mapped onto the trees (the result of inter-type branches is shown in Table 1). The result showed that overall histone modification changing patterns differed between the histone modification types and cell lineages (branches).
Fig. 1

Differentiation model of hematopoiesis of eight cell types used in this study

Thick and thin lines indicate inter-type and intra-type branches, respectively (see text). M, myeloid lineage; L, lymphoid lineage; Er, erythroblast; Me, megakaryocyte; Eo, eosinophil; Ne, neutrophil; Mo, monocyte; Nk, natural killer cell; T, T cell; B, B cell.

Table 1

The number of histone modification changes (nucleotids) for each inter-type branch.

ModificationChangeInter-type brancha
M-LM-ErMeM-EoNeMoErMe-ErErMe-MeEoNeMo-EoNeEoNe-EoEoNe-NeEoNeMo-MoL-NkL-TL-B
H3K4me1ON9,429,46639,703,05722,017,75835,913,94234,886,94224,421,32325,468,07926,236,71819,461,60133,753,46927,581,19833,533,882
OFF18,781,5139,462,4028,422,4732,591,3837,911,5986,476,17611,206,2425,179,44510,922,95322,154,14222,625,2075,541,398
H3K4me3ON1,684,125991,0611,313,708179,792661,888795,410182,5982,285,8092,941,7441,409,903613,3275,859,569
OFF415,2222,565,055563,361570,71912,5461,790,2942,871,781105,427115,1962,734,4332,227,01593,935
H3K27acON1,139,4953,438,8612,601,4703,244,3472,338,9031,414,49818,3855,776,7182,678,44215,562,0739,348,850962,543
OFF587,997914,4901,041,058340,141160,301748,3421,998,98822,581395,810467,148340,135636,148
H3K36me3ON9,220,17120,703,79711,042,54013,320,11414,424,86010,380,8556,095,26616,615,21510,233,80610,266,06215,715,81120,588,130
OFF11,278,81713,598,17210,329,1945,514,0915,530,87110,859,87013,945,6483,327,6966,078,63824,007,72713,181,7074,574,464
H3K27me3ON640,6473,548,9073,848,6794,699,466012,056,2417,385,6297,662,1552,485,8095,584,214911,6301,721,789
OFF6,597,1731,447,281554,44302,288,655367,5961,521,212493,8403,222,529886,8577,829,7068,627,963
H3K9me3ON34,29612,086,2411,654,71919,002,388886,152,03214,785,2661,622,5641,109,078441,776872,060506,071
OFF13,774,405126,221203,243346686,6221,030,277385,0002,544,7372,620,3315,127,6673,316,9661,646,179

Inter-type branches are shown with nodes. For example, M-L indicates the inter-type branch which connects myeloid lineage (the ancestral node of Er, Me, Eo, Ne, and Mo) and lymphoid lineage (the ancestral node of Nk, T, and B). Abbreviations are the same as Fig. 1.

Genomic locations of histone modification changes occurring on inter- and intra-type branches

To examine whether the histone modification changes during hematopoiesis could be inferred appropriately, the genomic locations of histone modification changes were compared between those occurring only on inter-type branches and those occurring only on intra-type branches. For each histone modification site, the distance from the TSS of the nearest gene was calculated and classified into 12 categories (0–1 kb, 1–3 kb, 3–5 kb, 5–10 kb, 10–100 kb, and > 100 kb for both upstream and downstream from TSS). The percentage (sum of sites divided by total sites) for each category is shown in Fig. 2. The distribution showed different genomic locations relative to TSS between inter- and intra-type branches. The differences were significant (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, P values <2.2e-16) for all the histone modifications except for H3K36me3. Enrichment of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 near TSS was found on inter-type branches in comparison with that on intra-type branches. Because H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 are known to be overrepresented in the promoter regions of active and repressed genes, respectively (Zhou et al., 2011), these results showed that these histone modification changes inferred to occur on inter-type branches reflected the roles of the histone modification as a regulator of cell-type differentiation. Especially, H3K4me3 was enriched in downstream of TSS (Fig. 2), consistent with a previous report (Barski et al., 2007). H3K4me1 showed slight enrichment in distal regions to TSS on inter-type branches compared with intra-type branches, possibly because it is known to be enriched in active enhancer regions, while H3K36me3 did not show any tendency related to TSS, likely because it is known to bind active gene body regions (Zhou et al., 2011). Overall, these results suggested that the ancestral state estimation could reconstruct histone modification changes on inter-type branches, whose genomic distribution showed characteristic of each histone modification. The histone modifications inferred on intra-type branches might contain modifications related to environmental and individual variation (Chen et al., 2016; Cheung et al., 2018) and modifications related to function other than transcriptional regulation, such as DNA repair (Wei et al., 2018), which might weaken the characteristic genomic distribution of each kind of histone modification.
Fig. 2

Distribution of histone modification changes relative to transcription start sites

The horizontal axis represents the proportion of sites where histone modification changes occurred relative to transcription start sites (TSS) of the nearest gene. The left half corresponds to the sites upstream of TSS, while the right half corresponds to the sites downstream of TSS. The color indicates the genomic position of the histone modification sites relative to TSS.

Differentiation model of hematopoiesis of eight cell types used in this study Thick and thin lines indicate inter-type and intra-type branches, respectively (see text). M, myeloid lineage; L, lymphoid lineage; Er, erythroblast; Me, megakaryocyte; Eo, eosinophil; Ne, neutrophil; Mo, monocyte; Nk, natural killer cell; T, T cell; B, B cell. The number of histone modification changes (nucleotids) for each inter-type branch. Inter-type branches are shown with nodes. For example, M-L indicates the inter-type branch which connects myeloid lineage (the ancestral node of Er, Me, Eo, Ne, and Mo) and lymphoid lineage (the ancestral node of Nk, T, and B). Abbreviations are the same as Fig. 1. Distribution of histone modification changes relative to transcription start sites The horizontal axis represents the proportion of sites where histone modification changes occurred relative to transcription start sites (TSS) of the nearest gene. The left half corresponds to the sites upstream of TSS, while the right half corresponds to the sites downstream of TSS. The color indicates the genomic position of the histone modification sites relative to TSS.

Functions of genes with histone modification changes occurring on inter- and intra-type branches

To further characterize histone modification changes occurring only on inter- or intra-type branches, the functional annotations of genes associated with histone modifications were analyzed. The results showed differences in the histone modification changes observed on inter- and intra-type branches (Fig. 3 for H3K4me3 and Supplementary Fig. 2 for other modifications). For example, H3K4me3 changes were enriched in genes related to “hematopoietic cell lineage” only on inter-type branches (Fig. 3). Furthermore, when inter-type branches were analyzed separately, lineage-specific features emerged. For example, H3K4me3 changes only occurring on the inter-type branch connecting to megakaryocytes (ErMe-Me in Fig. 3) were enriched in “platelet activation”, reflecting the differentiation process of megakaryocytes. Similarly, H3K4me3 changes only occurring on the inter-type branch connecting to NK cells (NkT-Nk in Fig. 3) were enriched in “natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity” while those only occurring on the inter-type branches connecting to erythroblasts (M-ErMe and ErMe-Er in Fig. 3) were enriched in “porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism”, reflecting hemoglobin synthesis. In contrast, H3K4me3 changes only occurring on intra-type branches of each cell type showed less cell-lineage specific function, where functional enrichment was not exclusively observed in an expected cell type, which might be consistent with the result of subsection 3.2 showing that intra-type branches included histone modifications other than those involving transcriptional regulation. As a whole, the results suggested that ancestral state estimation could reconstruct hematopoiesis-related histone modification changes that reflected the specific function of cell lineage at least for inter-type branches and partly for intra-type branches.
Fig. 3

Functional annotation of genes with H3K4me3 changes (ON) for each branch

Enriched functional categories of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) are shown for inter-type branches and intra-type branches of each cell type. “Inter (all)” indicates the changes occurring only on inter-type branches. Inter-type branches were also analyzed separately and shown. Gene ratio is represented as a circle, and its color corresponds to adjusted P value that was corrected based on Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple testing. Numbers in parentheses are the number of genes. Enriched functional category was not detected in eosinophils and is thus not shown. Abbreviations are the same as Fig. 1 and Table 1.

Inferred histone marks during hematopoiesis

Integration of different kinds of inferred histone modifications could be useful for revealing the genes involved in cell differentiation processes for each branch. For example, H3K4me3 and H3K27ac modifications in promoter regions are known as “active marks” related to the activation of gene expression, while H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications are known as “bivalent” having both activating and repressive chromatin found in progenitor cells (Zhou et al., 2011). Table 2 shows the example of GATA-1 gene, which encodes a transcription factor involved in erythroid cell and megakaryocyte development (Wolff and Humeniuk, 2013). H3K4me3 and H3K27ac modifications, found in erythroblast and megakaryocyte lineages, were experimentally shown in mice (Attema et al., 2007; Lara-Astiaso et al., 2014), indicating that ancestral estimation could correctly infer active marks of differentiating progenitor cells (internal nodes) for this gene. Since genome-wide histone modification information for human differentiating progenitor cells such as common lymphoid progenitors, common myeloid progenitors, granulocyte-macrophage progenitors, and megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors is not publicly available currently, inferred combinatorial pattern of histone marks for each gene of internal nodes, corresponding to those progenitor cells, could be valuable resources (available as Supplementary Table 2) for future research to understand the gene regulation in each cell lineage during hematopoiesis.
Table 2

The number of histone modification sites (nucleotides) of GATA-1 gene inferred for each internal node.

RegionModificationaInternal nodeb
MErMeErMeEoNeMoEoNeEoNeMoLNkTB
5′ upstreamH3K4me10264427142644002358000000
H3K4me30394394394000000000
H3K27ac0501643501000000000
GeneH3K4me30266426642664001389000000
H3K27ac0172317982094000000000
H3K36me30358738883587002981000000

Histone modification in which at least one node has a modification (> 0 sites) is shown.

Abbreviations are the same as Fig. 1.

As shown in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1, each cell type contains a heterogeneous population of cells from different tissues, individuals, and subtypes. It should be noted that the monophyly of the same cell types and the traditional hierarchical differentiation orders were assumed (fixed) in this study to obtain an average profile of histone modification changes occurring through hematopoiesis. Although the obtained results showed the reasonable inference of histone modification changes, this approach has some limitations. For example, it has been shown recently that granulocyte–monocyte progenitors are heterogeneous and they can be derived from both myeloid and lymphoid lineages (Laurenti and Göttgens, 2018). In such cases, this study can infer changing events assigned to an incorrect branch. Therefore, further analyses are needed to obtain a detailed and precise epigenetic landscape of hematopoiesis in future studies. Cell lineage, corresponding to cell division history, has been revolutionized by newly emerged technologies (Shapiro et al., 2013; Woodworth et al., 2017). For example, single-cell genomics with CRISPR gene editing techniques and subsequent phylogenetic analysis revealed cell lineage trees of zebrafish (McKenna et al., 2016) and mice (Kalhor et al., 2018). Furthermore, single-cell transcriptomics can infer pseudotime ordering of cells during development–differentiation trajectories (Fletcher et al., 2018; Kester and van Oudenaarden, 2018). These new technologies also led to an updated view of differentiation landscapes of hematopoietic cells (Höfer et al., 2016; Giladi and Amit, 2018; Laurenti and Göttgens, 2018). Because cell lineage can differ from cell differentiation trajectories (Marioni and Arendt, 2017), integrative analyses of these cell lineage trees, cell differentiation trajectories and epigenetic landscape, inferred here for human hematopoiesis as a model case, would enable a deeper understanding of the relationship between differentiation of diverse cell types and the biological processes underlying the development of an organism. Functional annotation of genes with H3K4me3 changes (ON) for each branch Enriched functional categories of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) are shown for inter-type branches and intra-type branches of each cell type. “Inter (all)” indicates the changes occurring only on inter-type branches. Inter-type branches were also analyzed separately and shown. Gene ratio is represented as a circle, and its color corresponds to adjusted P value that was corrected based on Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple testing. Numbers in parentheses are the number of genes. Enriched functional category was not detected in eosinophils and is thus not shown. Abbreviations are the same as Fig. 1 and Table 1. The number of histone modification sites (nucleotides) of GATA-1 gene inferred for each internal node. Histone modification in which at least one node has a modification (> 0 sites) is shown. Abbreviations are the same as Fig. 1.

Conclusions

This study suggested that ancestral state estimation based on phylogenetic analysis of histone modifications could reconstruct the landscape of histone modification during hematopoiesis. The inferred histone modification changes during cell differentiation processes reflected the characteristics of hematopoiesis of each cell lineage in terms of genomic position and gene functions. This approach can be extended to other cell types to understand multiple cell differentiation processes other than hematopoiesis by inferring transitions of epigenomes. The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplementary Table 1

Samples used.

Supplementary Table 2

The number of inferred histone modification sites (nucleotides) of each gene for each internal node.

Supplementary Fig. 1

Phylogenetic trees used for the inference.

Supplementary Fig. 2

Functional annotation of genes with histone modification changes (ON) for each branch.
  42 in total

1.  Maximum parsimony analysis of gene expression profiles permits the reconstruction of developmental cell lineage trees.

Authors:  Anagha Joshi; Berthold Göttgens
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Epigenetic regulation of pluripotency and differentiation.

Authors:  Michael J Boland; Kristopher L Nazor; Jeanne F Loring
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 3.  Maintenance of Epigenetic Information.

Authors:  Geneviève Almouzni; Howard Cedar
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 4.  Single-Cell Genomics: A Stepping Stone for Future Immunology Discoveries.

Authors:  Amir Giladi; Ido Amit
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The BLUEPRINT Data Analysis Portal.

Authors:  José María Fernández; Victor de la Torre; David Richardson; Romina Royo; Montserrat Puiggròs; Valentí Moncunill; Stamatina Fragkogianni; Laura Clarke; Paul Flicek; Daniel Rico; David Torrents; Enrique Carrillo de Santa Pau; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 10.304

6.  Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Gregory M Findlay; James A Gagnon; Marshall S Horwitz; Alexander F Schier; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  From haematopoietic stem cells to complex differentiation landscapes.

Authors:  Elisa Laurenti; Berthold Göttgens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Inferring cell differentiation processes based on phylogenetic analysis of genome-wide epigenetic information: hematopoiesis as a model case.

Authors:  Kanako O Koyanagi
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Study of cell differentiation by phylogenetic analysis using histone modification data.

Authors:  Nishanth Ulhas Nair; Yu Lin; Ana Manasovska; Jelena Antic; Paulina Grnarova; Avinash Das Sahu; Philipp Bucher; Bernard M E Moret
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.