Literature DB >> 32536729

Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.

Justin Paulsen1, Dubravka Svetina1, Yanan Feng1, Montserrat Valdivia1.   

Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) are of growing interest in educational research because of the models' ability to provide diagnostic information regarding examinees' strengths and weaknesses suited to a variety of content areas. An important step to ensure appropriate uses and interpretations from CDMs is to understand the impact of differential item functioning (DIF). While methods of detecting DIF in CDMs have been identified, there is a limited understanding of the extent to which DIF affects classification accuracy. This simulation study provides a reference to practitioners to understand how different magnitudes and types of DIF interact with CDM item types and group distributions and sample sizes to influence attribute- and profile-level classification accuracy. The results suggest that attribute-level classification accuracy is robust to DIF of large magnitudes in most conditions, while profile-level classification accuracy is negatively influenced by the inclusion of DIF. Conditions of unequal group distributions and DIF located on simple structure items had the greatest effect in decreasing classification accuracy. The article closes by considering implications of the results and future directions.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords:  classification; cognitive diagnostic models; differential item functioning

Year:  2019        PMID: 32536729      PMCID: PMC7262994          DOI: 10.1177/0146621619858675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  6 in total

1.  After Differential Item Functioning Is Detected: IRT Item Calibration and Scoring in the Presence of DIF.

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Youngsuk Suh; Woo-Yeol Lee
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-09-24

2.  Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Gongjun Xu; Stephanie Zhang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.

Authors:  Ren Liu; Anne Corinne Huggins-Manley; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.

Authors:  Jonathan Templin; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.

Authors:  Yuqi Gu; Gongjun Xu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Examining DIF in the Context of CDMs When the Q-Matrix Is Misspecified.

Authors:  Dubravka Svetina; Yanan Feng; Justin Paulsen; Montserrat Valdivia; Arturo Valdivia; Shenghai Dai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-11
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Multiple-Group Cognitive Diagnosis Models.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Ragip Terzi; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-10-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.