Literature DB >> 29728918

The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.

Yuqi Gu1, Gongjun Xu2.   

Abstract

Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are useful statistical tools in cognitive diagnosis assessment. However, as many other latent variable models, the CDMs often suffer from the non-identifiability issue. This work gives the sufficient and necessary condition for identifiability of the basic DINA model, which not only addresses the open problem in Xu and Zhang (Psychometrika 81:625-649, 2016) on the minimal requirement for identifiability, but also sheds light on the study of more general CDMs, which often cover DINA as a submodel. Moreover, we show the identifiability condition ensures the consistent estimation of the model parameters. From a practical perspective, the identifiability condition only depends on the Q-matrix structure and is easy to verify, which would provide a guideline for designing statistically valid and estimable cognitive diagnosis tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Q-matrix; cognitive diagnosis models; estimability; identifiability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29728918     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-018-9619-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  7 in total

1.  Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.

Authors:  Jonathan L Templin; Robert A Henson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

2.  A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.

Authors:  Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Consistency of nonparametric classification in cognitive diagnosis.

Authors:  Shiyu Wang; Jeff Douglas
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Gongjun Xu; Stephanie Zhang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  The DINA model as a constrained general diagnostic model: Two variants of a model equivalency.

Authors:  Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Statistical Analysis of Q-matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Yunxiao Chen; Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Theory of the Self-learning Q-Matrix.

Authors:  Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Bernoulli (Andover)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.595

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis [Formula: see text] Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.

Authors:  Justin Paulsen; Dubravka Svetina; Yanan Feng; Montserrat Valdivia
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-07-04

3.  Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.

Authors:  Motonori Oka; Kensuke Okada
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  A New Method to Balance Measurement Accuracy and Attribute Coverage in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Xiaojian Sun; Björn Andersson; Tao Xin
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-09-15

5.  Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Model With Pólya-Gamma Gibbs Sampling.

Authors:  Zhaoyuan Zhang; Jiwei Zhang; Jing Lu; Jian Tao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.