Literature DB >> 33304020

Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Multiple-Group Cognitive Diagnosis Models.

Wenchao Ma1, Ragip Terzi2, Jimmy de la Torre3.   

Abstract

This study proposes a multiple-group cognitive diagnosis model to account for the fact that students in different groups may use distinct attributes or use the same attributes but in different manners (e.g., conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory) to solve problems. Based on the proposed model, this study systematically investigates the performance of the likelihood ratio (LR) test and Wald test in detecting differential item functioning (DIF). A forward anchor item search procedure was also proposed to identify a set of anchor items with invariant item parameters across groups. Results showed that the LR and Wald tests with the forward anchor item search algorithm produced better calibrated Type I error rates than the ordinary LR and Wald tests, especially when items were of low quality. A set of real data were also analyzed to illustrate the use of these DIF detection procedures.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIF; Wald test; cognitive diagnosis; differential item functioning; forward anchor item search; likelihood ratio

Year:  2020        PMID: 33304020      PMCID: PMC7711248          DOI: 10.1177/0146621620965745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  10 in total

1.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs.

Authors:  Stephen Olejnik; James Algina
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-12

2.  A general framework and an R package for the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning.

Authors:  David Magis; Sébastien Béland; Francis Tuerlinckx; Paul De Boeck
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

3.  A Cautionary Note on Using G(2)(dif) to Assess Relative Model Fit in Categorical Data Analysis.

Authors:  Albert Maydeu-Olivares; Li Cai
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

5.  Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.

Authors:  Jonathan L Templin; Robert A Henson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

6.  Factor analysis of the Dutch-language version of the MCMI-III.

Authors:  Gina Rossi; L Andries van der Ark; Hedwig Sloore
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2007-04

7.  Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Charles Iaconangelo; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-01-18

8.  An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.

Authors:  Justin Paulsen; Dubravka Svetina; Yanan Feng; Montserrat Valdivia
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-07-04

10.  A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.

Authors:  Yanlou Liu; Hao Yin; Tao Xin; Laicheng Shao; Lu Yuan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.