Literature DB >> 29795911

The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.

Ren Liu1, Anne Corinne Huggins-Manley1, Laine Bradshaw2.   

Abstract

There is an increasing demand for assessments that can provide more fine-grained information about examinees. In response to the demand, diagnostic measurement provides students with feedback on their strengths and weaknesses on specific skills by classifying them into mastery or nonmastery attribute categories. These attributes often form a hierarchical structure because student learning and development is a sequential process where many skills build on others. However, it remains to be seen if we can use information from the attribute structure and work that into the design of the diagnostic tests. The purpose of this study is to introduce three approaches of Q-matrix design and investigate their impact on classification results under different attribute structures. Results indicate that the adjacent approach provides higher accuracy in a shorter test length when compared with other Q-matrix design approaches. This study provides researchers and practitioners guidance on how to design the Q-matrix in diagnostic tests, which are in high demand from educators.

Keywords:  Q-matrix; attribute structure; classification accuracy; diagnostic measurement; hierarchical diagnostic classification model; test design

Year:  2016        PMID: 29795911      PMCID: PMC5965543          DOI: 10.1177/0013164416645636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  5 in total

1.  Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.

Authors:  Jonathan L Templin; Robert A Henson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

2.  A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.

Authors:  Jimmy de la Torre; Chia-Yi Chiu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Gongjun Xu; Stephanie Zhang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Combining item response theory and diagnostic classification models: a psychometric model for scaling ability and diagnosing misconceptions.

Authors:  Laine Bradshaw; Jonathan Templin
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.

Authors:  Jonathan Templin; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.500

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Misspecification of Attribute Structure in Diagnostic Measurement.

Authors:  Ren Liu
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Retrofitting Diagnostic Classification Models to Responses From IRT-Based Assessment Forms.

Authors:  Ren Liu; Anne Corinne Huggins-Manley; Okan Bulut
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.

Authors:  Justin Paulsen; Dubravka Svetina; Yanan Feng; Montserrat Valdivia
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-07-04

4.  A general diagnostic classification model for rating scales.

Authors:  Ren Liu; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

5.  Theorems and Methods of a Complete Q Matrix With Attribute Hierarchies Under Restricted Q-Matrix Design.

Authors:  Yan Cai; Dongbo Tu; Shuliang Ding
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-08

6.  A Semi-supervised Learning-Based Diagnostic Classification Method Using Artificial Neural Networks.

Authors:  Kang Xue; Laine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.