Literature DB >> 26155755

Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.

Gongjun Xu1, Stephanie Zhang2.   

Abstract

Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) are important statistical tools in cognitive diagnosis. In this paper, we consider the issue of their identifiability. In particular, we focus on one basic and popular model, the DINA model. We propose sufficient and necessary conditions under which the model parameters are identifiable from the data. The consequences, in terms of the consistency of parameter estimates, of fulfilling or failing to fulfill these conditions are illustrated via simulation. The results can be easily extended to the DINO model through the duality of the DINA and DINO models. Moreover, the proposed theoretical framework could be applied to study the identifiability issue of other DCMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Q-matrix; diagnostic classification models; model identifiability; the DINA model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26155755     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9471-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  6 in total

1.  Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.

Authors:  Jonathan L Templin; Robert A Henson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

2.  A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.

Authors:  Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Statistical Analysis of Q-matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Yunxiao Chen; Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Identification of the 1PL model with guessing parameter: parametric and semi-parametric results.

Authors:  Ernesto San Martín; Jean-Marie Rolin; Luis M Castro
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Theory of the Self-learning Q-Matrix.

Authors:  Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Bernoulli (Andover)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.595

6.  Data-Driven Learning of Q-Matrix.

Authors:  Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2012-10
  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Bayesian DINA Modeling Incorporating Within-Item Characteristic Dependency.

Authors:  Peida Zhan; Hong Jiao; Manqian Liao; Yufang Bian
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-06-22

2.  Cognitive Diagnostic Models With Attribute Hierarchies: Model Estimation With a Restricted Q-Matrix Design.

Authors:  Dongbo Tu; Shiyu Wang; Yan Cai; Jeff Douglas; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  A Residual-Based Approach to Validate Q-Matrix Specifications.

Authors:  Jinsong Chen
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-01-23

4.  The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.

Authors:  Ren Liu; Anne Corinne Huggins-Manley; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Retrofitting Diagnostic Classification Models to Responses From IRT-Based Assessment Forms.

Authors:  Ren Liu; Anne Corinne Huggins-Manley; Okan Bulut
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.

Authors:  Yinghan Chen; Steven Andrew Culpepper; Yuguo Chen; Jeffrey Douglas
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.

Authors:  Yuqi Gu; Gongjun Xu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.

Authors:  Justin Paulsen; Dubravka Svetina; Yanan Feng; Montserrat Valdivia
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-07-04

9.  Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.

Authors:  Motonori Oka; Kensuke Okada
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.290

10.  A general diagnostic classification model for rating scales.

Authors:  Ren Liu; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.