Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2): a global pandemic and treatment strategies.

The emergence and rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), a potentially fatal disease, is swiftly leading to public health crises worldwide. The origin of SARS-CoV-2 infection was first reported in people exposed to a seafood market in Wuhan City, China in December 2019. It has been suggested that the infection is likely to be of zoonotic origin and transmitted to humans through a not-yet-known intermediary. As of 22 May 2020, the World Health Organization reported that there were approximately 4,995,996 confirmed cases and 327,821 deaths. SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted via inhalation or direct contact with droplets from infected people. It has an incubation period ranging from 2 to ≥14 days. The rate of spread of SARS-CoV-2 is greater than that for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Middle East respiratory coronavirus. The symptoms are similar to influenza (i.e. breathlessness, sore throat and fatigue) and infected cases are isolated and treated. Infection is mild in most cases, but in elderly (>50 years) patients and those with cardiac and respiratory disorders, it may progress to pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome and multi-organ failure. People with strong immunity or those who have developed herd immunity are asymptomatic. The fatality rate ranges from 3% to 4%. Recommended methods for diagnosis of COVID-19 are molecular tests (e.g. polymerase chain reaction) on respiratory secretions, chest scan and common laboratory diagnosis. Currently, treatment is essentially supportive, and the role of antiviral agents is yet to be established as a vaccine is not yet available. This review will focus on epidemiology, symptoms, transmission, pathogenesis, ongoing available treatments and future perspectives of SARS-CoV-2.

Introduction

Since the 19th Century, pathogenic viral outbreaks and their complex interactions with humans and animals (species jump) have resulted in cross-species transmission, posing a great threat to human health and safety [1], [2]. With rapid globalization and human activities, pathogenic transmission across continents has escalated and resulted in several pandemics, especially viral pandemics [3], [4]. Over the last two decades, there has been an upsurge in newly identified coronaviruses, such as Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Saudi Arabia [5], haemorrhagic fever viruses (Lassa, Ebola) in West Africa, and novel coronaviruses including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and highly pathogenic influenza (avian influenza A H7N9, pandemic H1N1) in China [4], [6]. These viral pandemics have resulted in substantial numbers of deaths. For example, SARS-CoV originated in bats and crossed over to humans via palm civets (host) in Guangdong Province, China; there were 8422 reported cases including 916 deaths (mortality rate 11%) in 26 countries [7]. MERS-CoV also originated in bats, with dromedary camels as the intermediate host; there were 2494 reported cases including 858 deaths (mortality rate 34%) in 27 countries [8]. Similarly, 28,637 cases of Ebola infection were notified including 11,315 deaths (mortality rate ≤40%) [9]. These pandemic situations have caused significant mortality and economic losses, and it is critical to prevent the spread of emerging viruses. This review sheds light on the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, epidemiology, global status and possible treatment strategies with future potential.

Coronaviruses (subfamily Coronavirinae, order Nidovirales) are common human pathogens. They are enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that belong to the family Coronavirdiae, and are known to cause acute respiratory, hepatic and neurological diseases with varying severity in humans as well as animals [10], [11], [12]. Coronaviruses are divided into four genera: alphacoronavirus (αCoV), betacoronavirus (βCoV), gammacoronavirus (γCoV) and deltacoronavirus (δCoV) [13]. Among them, two novel βCoVs (i.e. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV) have been reported with high mortality rates, as discussed above. The evolutionary analysis has notified that αCoVs and βCoVs are mainly found in bats and rodents, whereas δCoVs and γCoVs are mainly found in birds [11]. Coronaviruses are able to cross species barriers repeatedly and are important human pathogens. In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia-like illness caused by a novel coronavirus occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province and spread throughout China to the rest of the world [14]. In February 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) named the disease ‘coronavirus disease 2019’ (COVID-19) [15] and the International Committee on Virus Taxonomy named the virus ‘severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2’ (SARS-CoV-2) [16]. A group of virologists in China suggested renaming SARS-CoV-2 as ‘human coronavirus 2019’ (HCoV-19) to distinguish it from SARS-CoV and for consistency with WHO's name for the disease [17]. On 11 March 2020, WHO characterized SARS-CoV-2 as a pandemic situation [18]. On 22 May 2020, there were 4,995,996 confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 including 327,821 deaths in 216 countries [19], and the number is increasing worldwide (Fig. 1 A). In China, the total number of confirmed cases reported is 84,520 including 4645 deaths. The USA has reported the highest number of cases (1,525,186) and deaths (91,527) (mortality rate >12%). Fig. 1B shows the spread of COVID-19 in India, which is a neighbouring country to China, where the number of active cases (118,447) is increasing on a daily basis (Fig. 1C) but with a low death rate (~3.0%). This review will discuss the epidemiology, transmission, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, ongoing available treatments and future perspectives of SARS-CoV-2. By summarizing all information in one place, it is hoped that this review will be useful to the wider audience.

Fig. 1

(A) World map of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic (source: World Health Organization, accessed on 22 May 2020, time: GMT+5.30). (B) Occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 across different states of India on 22 May 2020. (C) One-month data of active, cured and deceased cases of SARS-CoV-2 across India on 22 May 2020 (source: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, accessed on 22 May 2020, time: GMT+5.30; https://www.covid19india.org/).

Origin and spread of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)

Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-sense RNA viruses with a diameter of 60–140 nm. These viruses are characterized by club-like spike projections of protein on the surface, with a crown-like (latin for crown is ‘coronam’, hence named ‘coronavirus’) appearance under the electron microscope [20]. In CoVs, the unusually large viral RNA genome (~30 kb) has a unique replication strategy due to the presence of a 5′ cap structure and a 3′ poly (A) tail; these allow it to act as an mRNA for translation of the replicase polyproteins. SARS-CoV-2 has strong affinity to bind with human cell receptors, which differentiates it from other coronaviruses [21]. Coronaviruses are known to cause a variety of diseases in mammals and birds, ranging from enteritis in cows and pigs, to upper respiratory disease in chickens, to potentially fatal respiratory infections in humans [21]. Previously, four different families of viruses – HKU1, 229E, NL63 and OC43 – were identified with transmission in humans leading to mild respiratory disease [22]. On 8 December 2019, adults in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China reported severe pneumonia of unknown cause in local hospitals, and the common exposure of these initial cases was a seafood market trading live animals in Huanan [22]. A surveillance system was activated immediately, and respiratory samples of diseased patients were collected for aetiological investigations. On 31 December 2019, WHO notified this incident as an outbreak, and the Huanan seafood market was closed on 1 January 2020. Based on virological investigations, on 7 January 2020, the virus outbreak was identified as a coronavirus infection that had >70% similarity with SARS-CoV and >95% homology with bat coronavirus. Environmental samples from Huanan seafood market were also reported to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 [23]. It was observed that the number of cases increased exponentially; however, some cases did not have direct exposure to the seafood market, suggesting that human-to-human transmission had occurred [24]. The first case was reported on 8 December 2019, but on tracing the virus back to where it originated and learning more about its spread, it was found that the first case was hospitalized on 17 November 2019. Massive migration of the Chinese population during Chinese New Year spread the epidemic globally, and cases were reported in other countries and on other continents. Transmission to healthcare professionals treating infected patients was first reported between 20 and 23 January 2020. To prevent further transmission, Wuhan was placed under lockdown, with restrictions place on 11 million people in terms of entry to and exit from the province.

Despite the extensive preventive measures, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in countries outside China was reported in populations with no history of travel, suggesting that local human-to-human transmission had started [25]. Considering the severity of the pandemic, countries evacuated their citizens from Wuhan and other ‘hot’ SARS-CoV-2 zones using special flights, and started testing for the virus or placing these people in isolation for 14 days for the safety of asymptomatic people. Importantly, the number of new cases reported in China has reduced recently, but numbers have increased exponentially in other countries [19]. Fig. 2 represents the percentage distribution of total confirmed cases and deaths in various countries on 25 April 2020. These numbers may underestimate the total numbers of infected or confirmed cases and deaths due to limitations of surveillance and testing in developing countries. Although the probable origin of SARS-CoV-2 is bats, the intermediary animal through which it crossed over to humans is uncertain. Pangolins and snakes are the current suspects [11], [22].

Fig. 2

Percentage of cases of coronavirus disease 2019 in 11 main countries affected. Dates are: India (30 January–25 April 2020); USA (30 January–26 April 2020); Spain (31 January–25 April 2020); Italy (29 January–25 April 2020); Germany (28 January–25 April 2020); UK (31 January–25 April 2020); France (24 January–25 April 2020); Iran (19 January–25 April 2020); China (11 January–26 April 2020); Russia (31 January–25 April 2020); and Australia (25 January–26 April 2020) [19].

Symptoms and diagnosis

Usually, the symptoms of COVID-19 appear after an incubation period of 2–14 days, with an average period of 5.2 days [26]. Most commonly, the onset of COVID-19 is marked by fever, dry cough, fatigue and muscle pain, with other symptoms such as headache, lymphopenia and dyspnoea. Some people may have diarrhoea or nausea 1–2 days before infection [27], [28], [29]. Patients may face difficulties in breathing 5 days after the onset of infection, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on day 8. If the patient's condition worsens, they may experience abdominal distress and pneumonia, with other functional failures depending on their immune and health status [30]. The length of time from onset of infection until death ranges from 6 to 41 days, with an average of 14 days [31]. This period is dependent on several factors such as age and health, and is shorter for patients with comorbidities and aged >70 years [31].

The Diagnosis and Treatment Programme (6th version) of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China defined the diagnosis of viral pneumonia based on radiological features as one of the diagnostic criteria for COVID-19 [32]. Accurate diagnosis using chest computer tomography (CT) may play an important role in the management of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, especially when no scientifically proven treatment exists. Clinical features revealed by chest CT scan are indicated as pneumonia in infected patients. Other abnormal features, such as ARDS, acute cardiac injury, RNAaemia and ground-glass opacities, that lead to death have also been reported [24]. The major notable symptom is the presence of multiple peripheral ground glass opacities in the subpleural regions of both lungs, which induce both systemic and localized immune responses leading to increased inflammation [33]. Importantly, there are similarities in symptoms between COVID-19 and earlier reported βCoV infections, such as dry cough, fever, dyspnoea and bilateral ground glass opacities [24]. However, COVID-19 also exhibits other clinical features targeting the lower respiratory region, such as rhinorrhoea, sneezing and sore throat [29], [34].

Additionally, investigation of chest radiographs of patients revealed infiltrate in the upper lobe of the lung which is associated with increasing dyspnoea with hypoxaemia [35]. The above discussions suggest that chest CT should be the preferred modality for diagnosis of COVID-19; however,the use of CT to diagnose COVID-19 is controversial. Detailed CT scan features for COVID-19 have been reported [27], [36]. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 usually develop gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhoea, whereas a low percentage of patients with MERS-CoV or SARS-CoV experienced similar gastrointestinal distress. Therefore, it is important to test faecal and urine samples to exclude a potential alternative route of transmission, especially among healthcare workers, patients etc.

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Following the first case of transfer of SARS-CoV-2 from animal to human, several cases of local transmission and, most seriously, community transmission, have been reported, leading to the pandemic status [18]. Based on the cases of infected people exposed at Wuhan seafood market, where live animals are sold routinely, it was suggested that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 could be zoonotic. Various efforts and retrosearching have been undertaken to identify a reservoir host or intermediate carrier from where the infection might be transmitted to humans. Two species of snakes have been identified as possible reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2; however, to date, there is no consistent evidence for a coronavirus reservoir other than mammals and birds [29], [37].

According to reports, human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is possible when an individual is in the incubation stage or showing symptoms, whereas some individuals are contagious and remain asymptomatic (i.e. superspreaders). Transmission occurs via inhalation of respiratory droplets (>10 µm) of exhaled virus from an infected person (within 1 m). The virus remains airborne for a prolonged period. Transmission also occurs via contact with infected surfaces, such as skin-to-skin, and through touching an infected inanimate object then mediating it through the mouth, nose or eyes [4], [30]. SARS-CoV-2 is reported to survive for several hours on contaminated metal surfaces and sterile sponges. Latex surgical gloves, if not changed after handling an infected patient, increase the opportunity for transmission via touch. The relative contributions of large respiratory droplets, smaller airborne aerosols (<5 µm) and direct surface contacts to the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 need to be evaluated to enable effective control of transmission and infection.

The faecal transmission route should also be considered, as SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in stool samples of infected patients [31]. Previously, it was reported that SARS-CoV can survive in stool samples for up to 4 days [6]. In other studies, the presence of coronaviruses has been reported in water, sewage, and pure or pasteurized settled sewage, and these viruses can remain infectious for 3 days to 3 weeks [38]. The presence of stool from an infected patient in wastewater may generate a further route of transmission via the generation of virus-laden aerosols during wastewater treatment. For example, a contaminated faulty sewage system in a high-rise housing estate in Hong Kong in 2003 was linked to a SARS outbreak in the surrounding area [39]. Therefore, aerosols arising from contaminated sewage represent a potential cause of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and needs further investigation.

Airborne dust is another possible route of transmission in respiratory diseases. Earlier reports have shown that transmission of infectious diseases is linked to the presence of micro-organisms in airborne particulate matter (PM)/airborne dust [40]. Air pollution is common in some countries (e.g. India, China, Saudi Arabia, Iran), and airborne PM matter or dust may influence the rate of transmission of viral infections. Inhalation of virus-laden fine PM could transport the virus into deep alveolar tissue and tracheobronchial regions, and increase the chance of infection [4]. Surface adsorption of SARS-CoV-2 on PM and airborne dust can contribute to long-range transport of the virus. Thus, an investigation of the survival of SARS-CoV-2 in airborne PM/dust will help to explain their role in transmission.

Recently, Chen et al. conducted a small study on pregnant women who were confirmed to have COVID-19. Although there is no evidence for transmission of viral infection from mother to child, the cloud of uncertainty persists [41]. Understanding this factor is very important as pregnant mothers are more susceptible to infection with respiratory pathogens and severe pneumonia. All pregnant mothers in the study by Chen et al. underwent a caesarean delivery, so it remains unclear whether viral transmission can occur during vaginal birth.

Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 and clinical manifestations

Recognition and receptor binding on host cells is the first step of viral infection, followed by fusion with the cell membrane [29]. It is reasoned that the lung epithelial cells are the primary target of the virus. Thus, it has been reported that human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV occurs by the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV spike protein binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors [20], [22]. Importantly, the sequence of the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is similar to that of SARS-CoV. This suggests that entry into the host cells is most likely via the ACE2 receptor [20], as depicted in Fig. 3 . The SARS-CoV-2 virus or virion contains four different proteins (envelope, spike protein, membrane and nucleoside) and an RNA strand. The spike protein helps to establish contact with human cells, and has a region which recognizes ACE2 receptors in human cells, especially respiratory cells. As the virion binds with ACE2 protein, another TMPRSS2 protein (on the exterior cell wall) helps to open the spike protein and cleave the membrane, allowing entry of the virion. Next, the virion releases its RNA strand, which is translated into protein and forms more RNA strands. During cell development (Fig. 3), one strand of the virion enters the Golgi bodies and evolving new virion those come out of cell where membrane and envelop proteins are present. One virion particle has the ability to make several hundred new virions in this way, each of which is capable of infecting new cells.

Fig. 3

Schematic representation of the genesis and transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in humans.

The pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 leading to acute respiratory disorders and pneumonia-like symptoms seems to be particularly complex and is responsible for initiating an excessive immune reaction in the host. The cytopathic effect and cytokine storm are related to the clinical condition of patients with COVID-19 [42]. Levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor and macrophage inflammatory proteins, are elevated and play an important role in the immunopathology of patients with COVID-19 [43]. During the period of infection, cytokines are expressed in lung epithelial cells, leukocytes and dendritic cells via the activation of pattern recognition receptors (including Toll-like receptors TLR3, TLR7 and TLR8), retinoic acid-inducible gene I and the NOD-like receptor family members. Also, direct virus-induced tissue damage and the synergistic cytokine effect cause extensive tissue damage and multiple organ dysfunction. An abundance of ACE2 protein on lung alveolar epithelial cells and enterocytes of the small intestine helps to explain the routes of infection and disease manifestations. IL-6 activates leukocytes, promotes differentiation of B lymphocytes and alters cell replication. IL-6 also stimulates the production of acute phase proteins, and plays a role in the thermoregulation and anti-inflammatory response [44]. Furthermore, deficiency of IL-6 and antiIL-6R monoclonal antibody leads to the persistence of influenza-like infection. Additionally, lymphocytes lack ACE2 receptors and compromise T lymphocytes. Most patients with COVID-19 have similar symptoms, such as fever, malaise and influenza-like features; however, some patients rapidly develop ARDS and multiple organ failure. Clinical examination reveals a reduced peripheral lymphocyte count and lymphocytopenia (due to reduction of CD4 T and CD8 T cells). Importantly, ACE2 regulates blood pressure, and an attack of SARS-CoV-2 on ACE2 receptors in endothelial cells results in coagulation, hypotension, cardiac injury, kidney dysfunction and secondary infections [42].

Therapeutics and treatment options

To date, no specific antiviral treatment or vaccine is available for treatment of COVID-19. Molecular interaction between virus cell receptors and host cells, mainly with surface spike glycoprotein(s), is particularly important for the development of antiviral treatment. Treatment of severe influenza still presents multiple challenges. Several trials are currently underway, aiming to discover a potential antiviral treatment for COVID-19. At present, the only option available is the use of broad-spectrum antiviral drugs [nucleoside analogues and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-protease inhibitors] in combination with antimalarial drugs and some potential antibiotics. All possible treatment options for the management of COVID-19 have been reviewed and are detailed below.

Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine

Recent publications [45], [46], [47] have focused attention on the potential benefits of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for the treatment of COVID-19. CQ is an amine acidotropic form of quinine, and has been used worldwide for decades as a front-line drug for the treatment and prophylaxis of malaria [48]. HCQ is a 4-aminoquiniline analogue of CQ with a hydroxyl group at the end of the CQ side chain. The pharmacokinetics of HCQ are similar to those of CQ, and it can be used for long periods with improved tolerability. The sulphate form of HCQ is available for oral administration with a higher dose than CQ for rapid gastrointestinal absorption and renal elimination. Clinical indications and toxic doses of these drugs are slightly different [45]. Regrettably, the efficacy of CQ/HCQ has declined gradually due to the continual emergence of CQ-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum. However, the activity of these drugs is not limited to malaria, as they have also been used in the treatment of autoimmune disorders (HIV) and viral infections associated with inflammation, and have broad-spectrum activity against a range of microbial (viral, bacterial and fungal) infections and inhibit their replication cycles [49], [50], [51], [52]. During long-term therapy, the clinical safety of HCQ is better than that of CQ, allowing a higher daily dose; however HCQ has fewer issues with drug–drug interactions. The broad-spectrum antiviral effects and clinical response of CQ and HCQ in SARS-CoV warrant particular attention for repurposing this drug for use in the treatment of COVID-19 [45], [50].

Antiviral potential of HCQ/ CQ against SARS-CoV-2

Due to the broad spectrum of activity of HCQ/CQ against viruses, including most coronaviruses, particularly SARS-CoV, and as coronaviruses enter cells through the endolysosomal pathway [53], it is reasonable, given the current public health emergency and the absence of any known efficient therapy, to further investigate the possible effects of CQ against SARS-CoV-2. In 2005, Vincent et al. reported that CQ had a strong antiviral effect on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells treated pre or post infection, suggesting both a prophylactic and therapeutic advantage [54]. In-vitro studies described that lethal infection of newborn mice with recombinant HCoV-O43 could be avoided by administering CQ via the mother's milk. CQ has also proved to be effective against MERS-CoV [48], although in-vitro results against MERS-CoV remain controversial.

In addition to several antiviral agents, CQ and HCQ have been proposed as treatments that could reduce viral transmission. In-vitro studies have shown that CQ and HCQ can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 transmission via alkalinization of the intracellular phagolysosome [55], which prevents virion fusion and uncoating, thereby decreasing viral spread. In a recent report, the Chinese National Centre for Biotechnology Development indicated that CQ is one of the potential drug candidates for the treatment of COVID-19. It has been investigated in hospitals in Beijing, Hunan Province and Guangdong Province. According to preliminary reports [56], [57], approximately 100 patients with COVID-19 treated with CQ experienced a more rapid decline in fever and improvement in lung function. The improved computed tomography (CT) images and shortening of recovery time compared with control groups, with no serious adverse effects, led to the inclusion of CQ in the treatment guidelines for COVID-19 by the Chinese Medical Advisory Board. As a result, CQ was probably the first drug to be used in China and elsewhere as the front-line treatment of severe COVID-19.

Under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the Indian Council of Medical Research recommended chemoprophylaxis and therapeutic use of HCQ in patients with COVID-19, with a dosage of 400 mg twice on day 1, then 400 mg once per week thereafter for asymptomatic healthcare workers treating infected patients and for asymptomatic household contacts of confirmed cases [58]. For the treatment of diagnosed cases, no clinical information is available, except for some pre-clinical examination results, such as reduction of viral load by administering HCQ in combination with azithromycin [47]. On the basis of these preliminary findings, CQ and HCQ have been prescribed to treat patients with COVID-19 to reduce the length of hospital stay and improve the SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia. WHO has also recommended that healthcare providers should use CQ [59] and HCQ [60] in adults and adolescents who weigh ≥50 kg. Recently published guidelines from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign on the management of critically infected patients concluded that there is a lack of evidence to offer any recommendations on standalone use of these drugs in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) [61]. It seems that discrepancies about the use of antimalarial drugs in the clinical management of patients in the ICU with severe COVID-19 require exhaustive research. This evidence, or the lack thereof, hardly justifies state-endorsed, widespread use of HCQ for prophylaxis. Long-term use of these drugs for the treatment of malaria demonstrates their safety during acute administration to humans; however, one cannot ignore the minor risk of macular retinopathy, prolongation of the QT interval in arrhythmic patients, and renal and hepatic impairment, which depends on the cumulative dose [59], [60]. A survey of the adverse effects of CQ/HCQ treatment in patients with COVID-19 with multiple organ dysfunction (e.g. cardiac injury and kidney malfunction) needs further evaluation. Currently, at least 10 clinical trials are testing CQ as a treatment for COVID-19 [62].

Mode of action of CQ/HCQ

CQ/HCQ has multiple mechanisms of action that may be useful in the treatment of COVID-19 [45], [63]:

HCQ inhibits entry of the virus into the host cells by binding to the host cell surface receptors by disabling ACE2 terminal glycosylation, leading to changes in surface morphology [54]. The association between SARS-CoV-2 and the host cells is disrupted as ACE2 is needed for the virus to attach to the host cells. CQ also inhibits quinone reductase-2, which is a structural neighbour of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerases [64] which are involved in the biosynthesis of sialic acids (acidic monosaccharides) present at the extremities of sugar chains present on cell transmembrane proteins, and one of the important components required for ligand recognition.

HCQ/CQ can impair the early stages of viral replication by increasing the endosomal pH required for the virus–host cell infusion. The inhibition likely involves endocytosis and annulment of virus–endosome fusion.

CQ can also interfere with the post-translational modification of viral proteins, which involves two enzyme proteases and glycosyltransferases. The process occurs within the endoplasmic reticulum/trans-Golgi network vesicles and may require a low pH. It localizes the M proteins in the Golgi complex beyond the site of virion budding, which suggests that this drug may inhibit replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virion.

HCQ acts as an ionophoric agent for Zn2+ ions and thus increases the influx of Zn2+ ions into the cytoplasm of the host cells regardless of whether the host target cells are infected or not [62]. Zn2+ ions adhere to the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase enzyme of the virus and stop SARS-CoV-2 intracellular polymerization.

HCQ not only attenuates the inflammatory response but also decreases the level of cytokines, which is generally higher in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. In one study, conducted by Yao et al., it was reported that HCQ is more potent than CQ in the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 [65]. In addition, CQ can inhibit IL-1β mRNA expression in THP-1 cells and reduce the release of IL-1β and tumour necrosis factor.

Ivermectin

Ivermectin is a synthetic derivative of macrocyclic lactones commonly known as avermectins that possesses broad-spectrum antiparasitic activity. Ivermectin has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an antiparasitic agent. In recent years, it has shown potent antiviral activity against a broad range of viruses, such as influenza A and dengue virus (DENV) [65], [66], [67]. It is known to inhibit the interaction between the HIV-1 integrase protein (IN) and the importin (IMP) α/β heterodimer responsible for importing the integrase protein [66], [68]. Ivermectin also inhibits IN nuclear import and HIV-1 and DENV replication [69]. It has been reported that this drug potentially inhibits the nuclear import of host cell and viral proteins, as observed in the case of SV40 large tumour antigen protein of simian virus and non-structural protein 5 of DENV [68], [69], [70], [71]. However, ivermectin did not show any potential efficiency against Zika virus. A clinical trial in Thailand (2014–2017) against DENV infection found that a single dose of ivermectin can result in a significant reduction in viral NS1 protein in serum, but no change in clinical benefits was notified [72].

Ivermectin potential against SARS-CoV-2

A series of clinical trials are underway to identify potential therapies or a vaccine for COVID-19. A group of researchers [72] from Monash University, Australia reported that ivermectin has shown broad-spectrum in-vitro antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. In an in-vitro experiment, they added a single dose of ivermectin to Vero-hSLAM cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 for 2 h. After analysing the cell pellets and supernatant for 3 days using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to analyse the replica of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, a 93% reduction in viral RNA in the supernatant was quantified in the sample treated with ivermectin compared with the control (DMSO treated), and a 99.9% reduction in cell-associated viral RNA. Efficiency increased to ~5000 fold by 48 h, and no toxicity was observed [67], [69]. In the above study, a serial dilution method showed similar efficiency with IC50 of ivermectin of ~2 µM.

Mode of action of ivermectin

Earlier studies on SARS-CoV protein revealed a potential role for IMP α/β1 in signal-dependent nucleocytoplasmic shutting of the SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein [73], which potentially impacts host cell division [74]. Additionally, SARS-CoV protein (ORF6) antagonizes the antiviral activity of the STAT1 transcription factor sequestering IMP α/β1 on the membrane of rough endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi bodies [75]. Ivermectin's nuclear transport inhibitory activity may be effective against SARS-CoV-2. Caly et al. hypothesized the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 by ivermectin by the inhibition of IMP α/β1-mediated nuclear import of viral proteins (Fig. 4 ), as shown for other RNA viruses [72]. Further identification and confirmation of this mechanism in SARS-CoV-2 infection still needs to be evaluated and various clinical trials are ongoing.

Fig. 4

Proposed antiviral mechanism of action of ivermectin against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). In the absence of ivermectin, IMP α/β1 binds to the coronavirus cargo protein in the cytoplasm, and crosses the membrane barrier through the nuclear pore complex into the nucleus where the complex dissociates and the viral cargo infects and reduces the host cell's antiviral response. In the presence of ivermectin, ivermectin binds to and destabilizes the IMP α/β1 heterodimer, preventing the binding of IMP α/β1 to the viral protein; this prevents the cargo protein from crossing the membrane barrier to enter the nucleus, thereby preventing infection and improving the antiviral response [69].

Lopinavir/ritonavir (protease inhibitors) and antiviral drugs

Lopinavir/ritonavir are antiretroviral drugs with protease inhibitor action, widely used for the treatment of HIV, and recently suggested as potential candidates for the treatment of COVID-19 [76], [77]. Previous studies confirmed the effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir against other coronaviruses [66], [78]. An open-label, non-randomized study showed reduced risk of severe hypoxia or death in 41 patients with SARS-CoV infection treated with lopinavir/ritonavir compared with 111 patients treated with ribavirin alone [78]. However, there is no evidence from randomized trials for the efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir for treatment of SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV infection [79].

Potential mechanism of action

SARS-CoV-2 enters the host cells and replicates, producing strands which contain multiple copies of RNA which accumulate at the periphery of the host cells to be cleaved and released [80]. 3-Chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) is an enzyme with a crucial role in processing viral RNA [81]. Lopinavir/ritonavir are protease inhibitors that inhibit the action of 3CLpro and thereby disrupt the process of viral replication and release from host cells [81]. Recent evidence suggests that these drugs have in-vitro antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 [76], [77], [82]. Most importantly, coronavirus proteases, including 3CLpro, do not have a C2-symmetric pocket, which is a target site for HIV protease inhibitors. This brings into question the potential potency of HIV protease inhibitors for the treatment of coronaviruses [83], and shows that C2 pockets are not important for antiviral action.

Clinical efficiency of protease inhibitors/antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2

In Wuhan, an open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted on 199 adult patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia-like symptoms [84], treated with lopinavir 400 mg/100 mg twice per day for 14 days (n=99) or standard care (n=100). The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, and most patients were severely unwell and required urgent clinical attention. Even after 28 days of treatment, the intention-to-treat analysis revealed no positive symptomatic relief in the primary outcome between the two groups. Moreover, there was some evidence that lopinavir can reduce mortality, shorten ICU stay and reduce time to discharge from hospital by 1 day. However, no clinical improvement was observed after 28 days in patients treated with lopinavir. No difference in viral clearance was found between the two groups, and conditions worsened due to the appearance of adverse side effects. The ELACOI (Efficacy of Lopinavir Plus Ritonavir and Arbidol Against Novel Coronavirus Infection) study was conducted on 44 patients with COVID-19 [85], divided into three groups: lopinavir, umifenovir and control. No difference was observed in the primary results. No improvement in pyrexia, cough or lung CT was observed after 7 and 14 days, and the clinical condition of patients deteriorated further [81]. Other studies [86], [87] conducted on hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with lopinavir and other protease inhibitors showed no potential improvement in clinical status, and patients exhibited a high rate of unfavourable outcomes with no difference in time for viral clearance compared with patients who did not receive this treatment.

An unpublished in-vitro study [88] reported that darunavir (HIV-1 protease inhibitor) was not active against SARS-CoV-2; however, on 4 February 2020, a group of researchers in China [89] reported that, in an in-vitro experiment, darunavir 300 μM inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the inhibition efficiency was calculated to be 280-fold compared with the untreated group. In-vitro studies using mouse models treated with remdesivir (a nucleoside analogue) found stronger evidence for antiviral MERS-CoV activity compared with lopinavir [90]. Wang et al. reported that remdesivir blocked SARS-CoV-2 infection with EC50 (effective concentration to inhibit 50% of cells) of 0.77 µM with a high selectivity index (>129.87) [91]. Holshue et al. reported that remdesivir exhibited promising results in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 in the USA [92]. In China, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre phase III clinical trial was started on 5 February 2020 to evaluate the efficacy of remdesivir in the treatment of COVID-19 [89]. Infected patients received an initial intravenous infusion of 200 mg of remdesivir with subsequent doses of 100 mg for 9 consecutive days, and the control group was treated in a similar manner with a placebo regimen. The outcomes of the trial are expected by the end of April 2020.

In-vitro antiviral efficacy of remdesivir/lopinavir against SARS-CoV-2 on Vero-E6 cells at 50% effective concentration was reported [82]. Ribavirin/favipiravir, which are in clinical trials, showed no viral inhibition even at higher concentrations (i.e. 100 μM). A synergistic effect of remdesivir and emetine could help to achieve 64.9% inhibition in viral yield. This proves that the combinational therapy may help to reduce the effective concentration of drugs and increase clinical benefits. Several groups of researchers are working on this class of drugs; however, due to insufficient evidence, only lopinavir is used to treat patients with COVID-19. Various dosage regimens of CQ, HCQ and other antiviral agents are undergoing investigation for treatment for chemoprophylaxis and therapeutic use, and these are summarized in Table 1 .

Table 1

Recommended guidelines for various dosage regimens for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 [52], [55], [86].

Drug	Administration	Dosage	Duration of treatment
Chloroquine phosphate	Oral	500 mg twice per day	<10 days
Hydrochloroquine	Oral	For asymptomatic healthcare personnel, 400 mg twice on day 1, then 400 mg once per week	For 7 weeks
		For quarantining individuals following contact with positive cases, 400 mg twice on day 1, then 400 mg once per week	For 3 weeks
Lopinavir/ ritonavir	Oral	200 mg twice per day (2 capsules of 50 mg each time)	<10 days
Ribavirin	Intravenous infusion	500 mg two or three times per day in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir or interferon-α	<10 days
Interferon-α	Vapour inhalation	5 million U twice per day	<10 days
Arbidol	Oral	200 mg three times per day	<10 days

Other potential drug candidates/therapies

Baricitinib

BenevolentAI is a target identification platform and knowledge graph which is a large repository of structured medical information with abundant connections extracted from the available scientific literature by a machine learning process [93]. Based on a BenevolentAI graph (Fig. 5 ), Richardson et al. searched for approved drug candidates with potential efficiency for inhibition of propagation of SARS-CoV-2 [94]. Herein, baricitinib was identified as a potential candidate that may reduce the capability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect lung cells. Baricitinib is a high-affinity AP2-associated protein kinase-1 (AAK1)-inhibiting drug with Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK 1/2) inhibition, which also binds to cyclin G-associated kinase (a regulator of endocytosis) [95]. A plasma concentration of baricitinib at therapeutic dose (i.e. 2 mg or 4 mg single dose) is sufficient to inhibit AAK1. It has been clinically tested on a selected population with COVID-19 using an appropriate patient population to reduce viral entry and inflammation in patients with a MuLBSTA score, and also predict viral mortality [96]. Due to the high affinity of baricitinib for AAK1 and JAK, its ability to ameliorate allied chronic inflammation in interferonopathies and pharmacokinetic properties make it a potential candidate for combination with direct-acting antivirals (lopinavir or ritonavir and remdesivir) to combat SARS-CoV-2 [97].

Fig. 5

BenevolentAI knowledge graph integrating biomedical data from existing structured and unstructured sources. Constructed on the basis of a fleet of algorithms to establish new relationships suggesting new treatment methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). AAK1, AP2-associated protein kinase-1; JAK 1/2, Janus kinase 1/2; GAK, cyclin-G-associated kinase [90], [91].

Interferon-α

According to WHO, the antiviral drug interferon (IFN)-α is recommended for the treatment of COVID-19 [98]. IFN-α is a broad-spectrum antiviral agent usually used to treat hepatitis [99], and it has been reported to inhibit SARS-CoV reproduction in vitro [100]. The recommended treatment regimen in adults is vapour inhalation of IFN-α at a dose of 5 million U dispersed in 2 mL of sterile water twice per day. If IFN-α is administered in combination with other antiviral drugs or nucleoside analogues, it could be more effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Currently, IFN-β1a and IFN-α2b are under investigation as potential candidates for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. IFNs can improve the immune system by turning on dormant parts, and aligning them with the defence mechanism against SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, as IFNs improve the immune system, the influenza-like symptoms of COVID-19 may worsen as naturally occurring IFNs are responsible for influenza-like symptoms. For instance, if a patient is on a ventilator or undergoing asthmatic treatment, the administration of IFN-based medicine could be catastrophic. WHO is investigating different IFNs to treat COVID-19, but no treatments exist to date. An open randomized clinical study has been launched in China on the efficacy and safety of IFN-α2β for treatment of COVID-19 in 328 adult patients; the results are due in June 2020 [101].

Arbidol

Arbidol is a potent broad-spectrum antiviral agent that has activity against enveloped and non-enveloped viruses [102]. Arbidol is a well-known antiviral agent in Russia, China and some Western countries. It was developed by the Russian Research Chemical Pharmaceutical Institute. Since 1990, arbidol has been used as an over-the-counter medicine for prophylaxis and treatment of ARDS, including influenza [102]. Arbidol exhibits a molecular mechanism of action against influenza viruses (influenza viruses A and B) that differs from other antiviral drugs. The antiviral mechanism of action of arbidol involves inhibition of virus-mediated fusion with the target membrane, which blocks virus entry into the target cells [103]. According to the literature, arbidol has been approved in Russia and China for the treatment of SARS, influenza and other viruses [104]. Recently, Deng et al. investigated combination therapy of arbidol with lopinavir/ritonavir using a small sample [105], and a small number of studies have confirmed the successful recovery of patients treated with arbidol and lopinavir. Zhu et al. undertook a study on 50 patients divided into two groups: lopinavir/ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg two times per day for 7 days (n=34 patients), and arbidol 0.2 g three times per day (n=16 patients). Data were analysed retrospectively [106]. After 14 days of treatment, no viral load was detected in the arbidol-treated group; however, the viral load was 44.1% in the lopinavir/ritonavir-treated group. No significant side effects were observed in either group. This combination therapy has been recommended by the National Health Commission and National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine for the treatment of COVID-19 [104], with limited clinical data available. An in-vitro study suggested that arbidol can significantly inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection at a concentration of 10–30 µM [85].

Convalescent plasma or blood plasma therapy

Convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) is akin to passive immunization, and has been proposed as a preventive measure for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The principle of therapy is very simple, and based on the premise that the plasma of a patient who has recovered from COVID-19 contains antibodies which are highly specific and have the ability to fight SARS-CoV-2 [107]. When antibodies obtained from recovered patients are ingested by a patient undergoing treatment, they will start fighting the infection in the second patient. This is a potential treatment measure for those who are critically affected by the virus, and may be preventative in individuals at high risk of contracting the virus (e.g. healthcare workers, immediate families of patients and other high-risk contacts).

Previously, CPT was employed successfully in the treatment of SARS [108], H1N1 [109], MERS [107] and H5N1 [110], with promising efficacy and safety. A meta-analysis of 32 studies of SARS-CoV infection and severe influenza showed that CPT led to a significant reduction in mortality compared with placebo [111]. A pilot study on 10 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection was conducted in China to explore the feasibility of CPT [107]. A single transfusion of convalescent plasma 200 mL into a patient with severe COVID-19 was well tolerated, and clinical symptoms improved with an increase in oxyhaemoglobin saturation within 3 days of treatment. Rapid neutralization of viraemia and no significant side effects were also observed. The US Food and Drug Administration has issued guidelines to healthcare providers and investigators to further investigate the efficacy of CPT from individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 [112], [113], and also issued guidelines for donors of convalescent plasma antibodies [112]. CPT may not be effective in every case, due to multiple organ failure or immunodeficiency, so a clinical trial is required to determine its feasibility and efficacy. In another report, an uncontrolled case series of five critically ill patients with COVID-19 and ARDS were treated with CPT containing neutralizing antibodies, and this led to an improvement in their clinical status [114]. In India, the Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology has received approval for the use of CPT for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 [115].

Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2

To date, there is no evidence of a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. After WHO's response to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, a research and development blueprint has been initiated to accelerate the development of vaccines and therapeutics for the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak [116]. Under WHO's coordination, several groups of scientists and experts with diverse backgrounds around the world are working on the development of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. According to one report, Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine may be a potential candidate; however, WHO does not recommend the use of BCG vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 as little evidence is available on its potency [117]. Two clinical trials are addressing this question, and WHO will evaluate the evidence and announce when it is available. Several vaccines are undergoing trials by various organizations and research groups, including ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (University of Oxford, 510 estimated participants, completion due May 2021) [118], mRNA-1273 vaccine (Modern and Vaccine Research Centre; targets the spike protein of coronaviruses) [119] and other forms of vaccine [120].

Miscellaneous

Numerous attempts to identify a potential treatment are underway worldwide. Other individual drugs or classes of drugs have been found to be effective in in-vitro experiments against similar viruses, such as fusion peptide (EK1) [122], RNA synthesis inhibitors (e.g. TDF, 3TC), antibiotics (azithromycin) [46], anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g. hormones), neuraminidase inhibitors (e.g. oral oseltamivir) and immunomodulators [36]. Additionally, Chinese medicine, such as ShuFengJieDu capsules and Lianhuaqingwen capsules, have shown potential in the prevention and treatment of new respiratory infectious diseases such as influenza A (H1N1) [121]. These drugs in combination with antiviral agents can decrease the time required for viral shedding, or improve patients’ health conditions. Nonetheless, the efficacy and safety of these drugs in COVID-19 need further evaluation and confirmation by clinical experiments.

WHO has launched ‘Solidarity’, an international clinical trial to find an effective treatment for COVID-19 [122]. Four treatment options are being evaluated to assess their efficacy and safety against viral infection, and other potential drug candidates may enter the regimen at a later date. Until and unless there are satisfactory outcomes from the various trials across the world, WHO and other regulatory bodies – such as the Indian Council of Medical Research and the European Union – are cautious about physicians and healthcare professionals recommending or administering unproven treatments to patients with COVID-19. The agencies are also concerned by individuals who are self-medicating with any types of medication which are thought to be effective (e.g. CQ) and causing serious side effects.

Very recently, a group of researchers from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India and Advanced Industrial Science & Technology, Tsukuba, Japan revealed that Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera, family solanaceae) and honeybee propolis contain bioactive agents such as withanolides (from Ashwagandha) and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE, from a mixture of honeybee propolis and fungal resin) that interact with a highly conserved protein, Mpro, of SARS-CoV-2 [123] using molecular docking tools. They found that Wi-N (withanone) and CAPE bind to the substrate-binding pocket of Mpro of SARS-CoV-2 with equivalent efficacy and binding energies as an N3 protease inhibitor. Superimposition confirmed that all the ligands exhibited similar binding mechanisms, and the binding free energies calculated using MM/GBSA for the N3 inhibitor, CAPE and Wi-N were also comparable. This study predicted that these natural compounds have the potential to inhibit the enzymes essential for virus survival, and will help in initial screening of anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs.

Conclusions and future perspectives to control the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has posed an ongoing threat to the human race. This viral strain infects host cells through ACE2 to cause COVID-19, and also causes damage to the respiratory tract and myocardium, although the specific mechanisms are still uncertain. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have an adverse prognosis, and patients already suffering from cardiovascular disease, ARDS and low immunity deserve particular attention. Based on the spread of the epidemic in several countries, WHO declared this infection to be a pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 has an incubation period of 2–14 days, and the infection is usually confirmed by PCR and chest scan. To date, no medical treatment or vaccine is available to treat COVID-19. Treatment with antiviral agents is essentially supportive, and higher doses have adverse effects. Therefore, there is an immediate need for medical treatment or a vaccine for COVID-19. The BenevolentAI knowledge graph [93] shows features of integrated biomedical data which could be a possible link for identifying treatment. The detection and quantification of biomarkers, such as cytokinins and IFNs, is important and useful in early screening of infection. The viral strands have different shelf lives on different surfaces. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in human faecal matter has been confirmed, and it is known that the virus can survie in facal matter for a long duration. In underdeveloped nations, where faecal decomposition take place in open areas, the rate of contact with the virus may increase. Hence, faecal screening of patients with COVID-19 is a promising challenge to understand transmission. The outer part of SARS-CoV-2 is made up of lipids that can be disrupted by surfactant or handwashing. As discussed above, CPT or blood plasma therapy could be a potential approach [107] in the treatment of COVID-19, as patients who have recovered from COVID-19 have developed antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Administration of these antibodies into an infected patient will help to provide a quick response against the infection. However, parameters of clinical diagnosis will be required in this procedure, such as patient's clinical status and diagnosis of other disorders.

Natural resources such as plants and resinous matter with antiviral characteristics are promising candidates for screening as lead molecules for drug design and development for the treatment of COVID-19. These existing natural resources will save time and be cost-effective in the current scenario of an international health emergency and lack of treatment modalities.

In future, the development of a biosensor (a device that can transform the biochemical signal into a measurable signal) with the ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 or a biomarker associated with COVID-19 [124], wearable devices with the ability to detect clinical symptoms/physiological signs related to the onset of SARS-CoV-2 (e.g. fever, cough and fatigue [125], and development of vaccine could help to achieve early detection and management of SARS-CoV-2. Based on the authors’ experience [126], [127] and other literature [128], [129], a biosensor could be a promising solution to address fast screening of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, and an alternative to the routinely employed RT-PCR technique. In one strategy, an optical biosensor could detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in exhaled air, sneeze droplets or a swab sample from an individual, where biochemical signal generation is converted into a measurable optical signal such as colour change, coagulation or visual signal generation. For example, fluorescently labelled biorecognition elements (nucleic acid, antibody, peptide) can be immobilized on the surface of nanoparticles (with the ability to quench the fluorescence, such as titanium dioxide nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, graphene etc). In the absence of an antigen (virus in the present case), the fluorescence of labelled bioreceptors will be quenched due to fluorescence energy transfer between fluorescently labelled bioreceptors and nanoparticles. In the presence of an antigen, the high-affinity molecular interaction between the antigen and the bioreceptors will lead to conformational changes in the structure of bioreceptors, and result in fluorescence recovery due to desorption from the nanoparticle surface or a decrease in the Förster resonance energy transfer phenomenon [126]. This signal can be analysed qualitatively for the presence of virus molecules by a switch on/off system [128], or could calculate these signals quantitatively against the concentration of antigen [129]. In another strategy, an aptasensor and immunosensor could be designed; for example, by capturing virion particles using immobilized aptamer/antibody on a gold quartz crystal surface mounted on an electrochemical quartz crystal nanobalance. The binding of virion molecules to receptors will result in a change in resonant energy or mass over the crystal surface, and the surface can subsequently be regenerated with a regenerating agent (e.g. 4.0 % w/v glycine or 0.10 M glycine), where lowering the pH will break the binding interaction or regenration by addition of 1.0% SDS [130], [131]. Secondly, the addition of a surfactant (e.g. CTAB) to the antigen eluted fraction will result in cell lysis by disrupting the cell membrane of virion molecules, and the subsequent addition of gold nanoparticles will allow colorimetric detection based on CTAB-induced aggregation of AuNPs [132]. These strategies have been proposed based on the authors’ experience and the available literature; however, the reliability and reproducibility of these strategies cannot be predicted until experiments are undertaken.

The current molecular diagnosis used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR takes 3–4 h, including the various steps of preparation of viral RNA, incubation, washing etc. Therefore, there is an obvious need for highly sensitive, fast and effective diagnostic methods that could detect these antigens directly in the complex matrix with little or no sample preparation. Recently, two biosensing platforms based on dual functional plasmonic photothermal biosensors coupled with surface plasmon resonance [133] and a field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensor [134] were reported for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples such as human nasopharyngeal swab specimens. The dual-functional LSPR biosensor [133] exhibited high sensitivity towards SARS-CoV-2 sequences, offered a lower detection limit (0.22 pM), and allowed precise detection of the specific target in a multigene mixture. The FET-based biosensor exhibited detection limits of 1 fg mL−1 and 100 fg mL−1 SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins in phosphate-buffered saline and clinical transport medium, respectively. Additionally, it successfully detected 1.6 × 101 pfu mL−1 SARS-CoV-2 in culture medium and 2.42 × 102 copies mL−1 in clinical samples. The above detection platforms are reliable and easy to implement for the improvement of diagnostic accuracy, and require little or no sample pre-treatment. These platforms could relieve the pressure on PCR-based methods.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: None.