Literature DB >> 32020029

Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro.

Manli Wang1, Ruiyuan Cao2, Leike Zhang1, Xinglou Yang1, Jia Liu1, Mingyue Xu1, Zhengli Shi1, Zhihong Hu3, Wu Zhong4, Gengfu Xiao5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32020029      PMCID: PMC7054408          DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Res        ISSN: 1001-0602            Impact factor:   25.617


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor,

In December 2019, a novel pneumonia caused by a previously unknown pathogen emerged in Wuhan, a city of 11 million people in central China. The initial cases were linked to exposures in a seafood market in Wuhan.[1] As of January 27, 2020, the Chinese authorities reported 2835 confirmed cases in mainland China, including 81 deaths. Additionally, 19 confirmed cases were identified in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, and 39 imported cases were identified in Thailand, Japan, South Korea, United States, Vietnam, Singapore, Nepal, France, Australia and Canada. The pathogen was soon identified as a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which is closely related to sever acute respiratory syndrome CoV (SARS-CoV).[2] Currently, there is no specific treatment against the new virus. Therefore, identifying effective antiviral agents to combat the disease is urgently needed. An efficient approach to drug discovery is to test whether the existing antiviral drugs are effective in treating related viral infections. The 2019-nCoV belongs to Betacoronavirus which also contains SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV). Several drugs, such as ribavirin, interferon, lopinavir-ritonavir, corticosteroids, have been used in patients with SARS or MERS, although the efficacy of some drugs remains controversial.[3] In this study, we evaluated the antiviral efficiency of five FAD-approved drugs including ribavirin, penciclovir, nitazoxanide, nafamostat, chloroquine and two well-known broad-spectrum antiviral drugs remdesivir (GS-5734) and favipiravir (T-705) against a clinical isolate of 2019-nCoV in vitro. Standard assays were carried out to measure the effects of these compounds on the cytotoxicity, virus yield and infection rates of 2019-nCoVs. Firstly, the cytotoxicity of the candidate compounds in Vero E6 cells (ATCC-1586) was determined by the CCK8 assay. Then, Vero E6 cells were infected with nCoV-2019BetaCoV/Wuhan/WIV04/2019[2] at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.05 in the presence of varying concentrations of the test drugs. DMSO was used in the controls. Efficacies were evaluated by quantification of viral copy numbers in the cell supernatant via quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and confirmed with visualization of virus nucleoprotein (NP) expression through immunofluorescence microscopy at 48 h post infection (p.i.) (cytopathic effect was not obvious at this time point of infection). Among the seven tested drugs, high concentrations of three nucleoside analogs including ribavirin (half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) = 109.50 μM, half-cytotoxic concentration (CC50) > 400 μM, selectivity index (SI) > 3.65), penciclovir (EC50 = 95.96 μM, CC50 > 400 μM, SI > 4.17) and favipiravir (EC50 = 61.88 μM, CC50 > 400 μM, SI > 6.46) were required to reduce the viral infection (Fig. 1a and Supplementary information, Fig. S1). However, favipiravir has been shown to be 100% effective in protecting mice against Ebola virus challenge, although its EC50 value in Vero E6 cells was as high as 67 μM,[4] suggesting further in vivo studies are recommended to evaluate this antiviral nucleoside. Nafamostat, a potent inhibitor of MERS-CoV, which prevents membrane fusion, was inhibitive against the 2019-nCoV infection (EC50 = 22.50 μM, CC50 > 100 μM, SI > 4.44). Nitazoxanide, a commercial antiprotozoal agent with an antiviral potential against a broad range of viruses including human and animal coronaviruses, inhibited the 2019-nCoV at a low-micromolar concentration (EC50 = 2.12 μM; CC50 > 35.53 μM; SI > 16.76). Further in vivo evaluation of this drug against 2019-nCoV infection is recommended. Notably, two compounds remdesivir (EC50 = 0.77 μM; CC50 > 100 μM; SI > 129.87) and chloroquine (EC50 = 1.13 μM; CC50 > 100 μM, SI > 88.50) potently blocked virus infection at low-micromolar concentration and showed high SI (Fig. 1a, b).
Fig. 1

The antiviral activities of the test drugs against 2019-nCoV in vitro.

a Vero E6 cells were infected with 2019-nCoV at an MOI of 0.05 in the treatment of different doses of the indicated antivirals for 48 h. The viral yield in the cell supernatant was then quantified by qRT-PCR. Cytotoxicity of these drugs to Vero E6 cells was measured by CCK-8 assays. The left and right Y-axis of the graphs represent mean % inhibition of virus yield and cytotoxicity of the drugs, respectively. The experiments were done in triplicates. b Immunofluorescence microscopy of virus infection upon treatment of remdesivir and chloroquine. Virus infection and drug treatment were performed as mentioned above. At 48 h p.i., the infected cells were fixed, and then probed with rabbit sera against the NP of a bat SARS-related CoV[2] as the primary antibody and Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; Abcam) as the secondary antibody, respectively. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst dye. Bars, 100 μm. c and d Time-of-addition experiment of remdesivir and chloroquine. For “Full-time” treatment, Vero E6 cells were pre-treated with the drugs for 1 h, and virus was then added to allow attachment for 2 h. Afterwards, the virus–drug mixture was removed, and the cells were cultured with drug-containing medium until the end of the experiment. For “Entry” treatment, the drugs were added to the cells for 1 h before viral attachment, and at 2 h p.i., the virus–drug mixture was replaced with fresh culture medium and maintained till the end of the experiment. For “Post-entry” experiment, drugs were added at 2 h p.i., and maintained until the end of the experiment. For all the experimental groups, cells were infected with 2019-nCoV at an MOI of 0.05, and virus yield in the infected cell supernatants was quantified by qRT-PCR c and NP expression in infected cells was analyzed by Western blot d at 14 h p.i.

The antiviral activities of the test drugs against 2019-nCoV in vitro.

a Vero E6 cells were infected with 2019-nCoV at an MOI of 0.05 in the treatment of different doses of the indicated antivirals for 48 h. The viral yield in the cell supernatant was then quantified by qRT-PCR. Cytotoxicity of these drugs to Vero E6 cells was measured by CCK-8 assays. The left and right Y-axis of the graphs represent mean % inhibition of virus yield and cytotoxicity of the drugs, respectively. The experiments were done in triplicates. b Immunofluorescence microscopy of virus infection upon treatment of remdesivir and chloroquine. Virus infection and drug treatment were performed as mentioned above. At 48 h p.i., the infected cells were fixed, and then probed with rabbit sera against the NP of a bat SARS-related CoV[2] as the primary antibody and Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; Abcam) as the secondary antibody, respectively. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst dye. Bars, 100 μm. c and d Time-of-addition experiment of remdesivir and chloroquine. For “Full-time” treatment, Vero E6 cells were pre-treated with the drugs for 1 h, and virus was then added to allow attachment for 2 h. Afterwards, the virus–drug mixture was removed, and the cells were cultured with drug-containing medium until the end of the experiment. For “Entry” treatment, the drugs were added to the cells for 1 h before viral attachment, and at 2 h p.i., the virus–drug mixture was replaced with fresh culture medium and maintained till the end of the experiment. For “Post-entry” experiment, drugs were added at 2 h p.i., and maintained until the end of the experiment. For all the experimental groups, cells were infected with 2019-nCoV at an MOI of 0.05, and virus yield in the infected cell supernatants was quantified by qRT-PCR c and NP expression in infected cells was analyzed by Western blot d at 14 h p.i. Remdesivir has been recently recognized as a promising antiviral drug against a wide array of RNA viruses (including SARS/MERS-CoV[5]) infection in cultured cells, mice and nonhuman primate (NHP) models. It is currently under clinical development for the treatment of Ebola virus infection.[6] Remdesivir is an adenosine analogue, which incorporates into nascent viral RNA chains and results in pre-mature termination.[7] Our time-of-addition assay showed remdesivir functioned at a stage post virus entry (Fig. 1c, d), which is in agreement with its putative anti-viral mechanism as a nucleotide analogue. Warren et al. showed that in NHP model, intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg dose of remdesivir resulted in concomitant persistent levels of its active form in the blood (10 μM) and conferred 100% protection against Ebola virus infection.[7] Our data showed that EC90 value of remdesivir against 2019-nCoV in Vero E6 cells was 1.76 μM, suggesting its working concentration is likely to be achieved in NHP. Our preliminary data (Supplementary information, Fig. S2) showed that remdesivir also inhibited virus infection efficiently in a human cell line (human liver cancer Huh-7 cells), which is sensitive to 2019-nCoV.[2] Chloroquine, a widely-used anti-malarial and autoimmune disease drug, has recently been reported as a potential broad-spectrum antiviral drug.[8,9] Chloroquine is known to block virus infection by increasing endosomal pH required for virus/cell fusion, as well as interfering with the glycosylation of cellular receptors of SARS-CoV.[10] Our time-of-addition assay demonstrated that chloroquine functioned at both entry, and at post-entry stages of the 2019-nCoV infection in Vero E6 cells (Fig. 1c, d). Besides its antiviral activity, chloroquine has an immune-modulating activity, which may synergistically enhance its antiviral effect in vivo. Chloroquine is widely distributed in the whole body, including lung, after oral administration. The EC90 value of chloroquine against the 2019-nCoV in Vero E6 cells was 6.90 μM, which can be clinically achievable as demonstrated in the plasma of rheumatoid arthritis patients who received 500 mg administration.[11] Chloroquine is a cheap and a safe drug that has been used for more than 70 years and, therefore, it is potentially clinically applicable against the 2019-nCoV. Our findings reveal that remdesivir and chloroquine are highly effective in the control of 2019-nCoV infection in vitro. Since these compounds have been used in human patients with a safety track record and shown to be effective against various ailments, we suggest that they should be assessed in human patients suffering from the novel coronavirus disease. Supplementary information, Materials and Figures
  10 in total

1.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics.

Authors:  Sabue Mulangu; Lori E Dodd; Richard T Davey; Olivier Tshiani Mbaya; Michael Proschan; Daniel Mukadi; Mariano Lusakibanza Manzo; Didier Nzolo; Antoine Tshomba Oloma; Augustin Ibanda; Rosine Ali; Sinaré Coulibaly; Adam C Levine; Rebecca Grais; Janet Diaz; H Clifford Lane; Jean-Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum; Billy Sivahera; Modet Camara; Richard Kojan; Robert Walker; Bonnie Dighero-Kemp; Huyen Cao; Philippe Mukumbayi; Placide Mbala-Kingebeni; Steve Ahuka; Sarah Albert; Tyler Bonnett; Ian Crozier; Michael Duvenhage; Calvin Proffitt; Marc Teitelbaum; Thomas Moench; Jamila Aboulhab; Kevin Barrett; Kelly Cahill; Katherine Cone; Risa Eckes; Lisa Hensley; Betsey Herpin; Elizabeth Higgs; Julie Ledgerwood; Jerome Pierson; Mary Smolskis; Ydrissa Sow; John Tierney; Sumathi Sivapalasingam; Wendy Holman; Nikki Gettinger; David Vallée; Jacqueline Nordwall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses.

Authors:  Timothy P Sheahan; Amy C Sims; Rachel L Graham; Vineet D Menachery; Lisa E Gralinski; James B Case; Sarah R Leist; Krzysztof Pyrc; Joy Y Feng; Iva Trantcheva; Roy Bannister; Yeojin Park; Darius Babusis; Michael O Clarke; Richard L Mackman; Jamie E Spahn; Christopher A Palmiotti; Dustin Siegel; Adrian S Ray; Tomas Cihlar; Robert Jordan; Mark R Denison; Ralph S Baric
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Successful treatment of advanced Ebola virus infection with T-705 (favipiravir) in a small animal model.

Authors:  Lisa Oestereich; Anja Lüdtke; Stephanie Wurr; Toni Rieger; César Muñoz-Fontela; Stephan Günther
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.970

4.  Dose refinements in long-term therapy of rheumatoid arthritis with antimalarials.

Authors:  A H Mackenzie
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-07-18       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.

Authors:  Martin J Vincent; Eric Bergeron; Suzanne Benjannet; Bobbie R Erickson; Pierre E Rollin; Thomas G Ksiazek; Nabil G Seidah; Stuart T Nichol
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 6.  Coronaviruses - drug discovery and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Alimuddin Zumla; Jasper F W Chan; Esam I Azhar; David S C Hui; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  New insights into the antiviral effects of chloroquine.

Authors:  Andrea Savarino; Livia Di Trani; Isabella Donatelli; Roberto Cauda; Antonio Cassone
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  Anti-malaria drug chloroquine is highly effective in treating avian influenza A H5N1 virus infection in an animal model.

Authors:  Yiwu Yan; Zhen Zou; Yang Sun; Xiao Li; Kai-Feng Xu; Yuquan Wei; Ningyi Jin; Chengyu Jiang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 25.617

10.  Therapeutic efficacy of the small molecule GS-5734 against Ebola virus in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Travis K Warren; Robert Jordan; Michael K Lo; Adrian S Ray; Richard L Mackman; Veronica Soloveva; Dustin Siegel; Michel Perron; Roy Bannister; Hon C Hui; Nate Larson; Robert Strickley; Jay Wells; Kelly S Stuthman; Sean A Van Tongeren; Nicole L Garza; Ginger Donnelly; Amy C Shurtleff; Cary J Retterer; Dima Gharaibeh; Rouzbeh Zamani; Tara Kenny; Brett P Eaton; Elizabeth Grimes; Lisa S Welch; Laura Gomba; Catherine L Wilhelmsen; Donald K Nichols; Jonathan E Nuss; Elyse R Nagle; Jeffrey R Kugelman; Gustavo Palacios; Edward Doerffler; Sean Neville; Ernest Carra; Michael O Clarke; Lijun Zhang; Willard Lew; Bruce Ross; Queenie Wang; Kwon Chun; Lydia Wolfe; Darius Babusis; Yeojin Park; Kirsten M Stray; Iva Trancheva; Joy Y Feng; Ona Barauskas; Yili Xu; Pamela Wong; Molly R Braun; Mike Flint; Laura K McMullan; Shan-Shan Chen; Rachel Fearns; Swami Swaminathan; Douglas L Mayers; Christina F Spiropoulou; William A Lee; Stuart T Nichol; Tomas Cihlar; Sina Bavari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total
  2000 in total

Review 1.  Dissecting the interaction between COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ying Jie Chee; Seng Kiong Tan; Ester Yeoh
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.232

2.  Perspectives on repositioning chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Covid-19.

Authors:  Ahmed Awad Adeel
Journal:  Sudan J Paediatr       Date:  2020

Review 3.  Drug repurposing for the treatment of COVID-19: Pharmacological aspects and synthetic approaches.

Authors:  Pedro N Batalha; Luana S M Forezi; Carolina G S Lima; Fernanda P Pauli; Fernanda C S Boechat; Maria Cecília B V de Souza; Anna C Cunha; Vitor F Ferreira; Fernando de C da Silva
Journal:  Bioorg Chem       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.275

4.  COVID-19: Urgent Reconsideration of Lung Edema as a Preventable Outcome: Inhibition of TRPV4 As a Promising and Feasible Approach.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kuebler; Sven-Eric Jordt; Wolfgang Liedtke
Journal:  SSRN       Date:  2020-03-23

Review 5.  Medication use during COVID-19: Review of recent evidence.

Authors:  T S Brandon Ng; Kori Leblanc; Darwin F Yeung; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Network-based drug repurposing for novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Yadi Zhou; Yuan Hou; Jiayu Shen; Yin Huang; William Martin; Feixiong Cheng
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 10.849

7.  Chloroquine in fighting COVID-19: good, bad, or both?

Authors:  Daolin Tang; Jingbo Li; Ruoxi Zhang; Rui Kang; Daniel J Klionsky
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 8.  Coronavirus disease and the cardiovascular system: a narrative review of the mechanisms of injury and management implications.

Authors:  Maria Vega Brizneda; Agam Bansal; Vardhmaan Jain; Samir Kapadia; Lars G Svensson; Venu Menon; Paul Cremer; Grant Reed; Penelope Rampersad; Richard Grimm; Brian P Griffin; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 9.  What Has Changed in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis After COVID-19?

Authors:  Yaşar Keskin; Gökhan Koz; Kemal Nas
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2021-06

Review 10.  Neuropathogenesis and Neurologic Manifestations of the Coronaviruses in the Age of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Review.

Authors:  Adeel S Zubair; Lindsay S McAlpine; Tova Gardin; Shelli Farhadian; Deena E Kuruvilla; Serena Spudich
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 18.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.