BACKGROUND: The clinical response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin was examined after establishing the in vitro antiviral susceptibility of the SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of antiviral agents. METHODS: The in vitro susceptibility of the prototype of SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors currently licensed for clinical use was studied. Forty one patients with SARS followed for 3 weeks were treated with a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin. The clinical progress and virological outcomes were monitored and compared with 111 patients treated with ribavirin only who served as historical controls. RESULTS: In vitro antiviral activity against SARS associated coronavirus was demonstrated for lopinavir and ribavirin at concentrations of 4 micro g/ml and 50 micro g/ml, respectively, only at 48 hours. The adverse clinical outcome (ARDS or death) was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the historical controls (2.4% v 28.8%, p<0.001) at day 21 after the onset of symptoms. The adverse outcome remained significantly lower in the treatment group than in the controls-both those diagnosed early (p<0.001) and those diagnosed later in the course of the epidemic (p = 0.002)-but there was no significant difference in adverse outcome rates between the two time periods (p = 0.548). No time related difference in outcome was observed in the control groups. A reduction in steroid usage and nosocomial infections was seen in patients initially treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, and these patients had a decreasing viral load and rising peripheral lymphocyte count. Multivariate analysis showed that age, hepatitis B carrier status, and lack of treatment with this antiviral combination were independent predictors of an adverse outcome. Lopinavir/ritonavir treatment was associated with a better outcome even when adjusted for baseline lactate dehydrogenase level. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent favourable clinical response with lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin supports further randomised placebo controlled trials in patients with SARS.
BACKGROUND: The clinical response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin was examined after establishing the in vitro antiviral susceptibility of the SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of antiviral agents. METHODS: The in vitro susceptibility of the prototype of SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors currently licensed for clinical use was studied. Forty one patients with SARS followed for 3 weeks were treated with a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin. The clinical progress and virological outcomes were monitored and compared with 111 patients treated with ribavirin only who served as historical controls. RESULTS: In vitro antiviral activity against SARS associated coronavirus was demonstrated for lopinavir and ribavirin at concentrations of 4 micro g/ml and 50 micro g/ml, respectively, only at 48 hours. The adverse clinical outcome (ARDS or death) was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the historical controls (2.4% v 28.8%, p<0.001) at day 21 after the onset of symptoms. The adverse outcome remained significantly lower in the treatment group than in the controls-both those diagnosed early (p<0.001) and those diagnosed later in the course of the epidemic (p = 0.002)-but there was no significant difference in adverse outcome rates between the two time periods (p = 0.548). No time related difference in outcome was observed in the control groups. A reduction in steroid usage and nosocomial infections was seen in patients initially treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, and these patients had a decreasing viral load and rising peripheral lymphocyte count. Multivariate analysis showed that age, hepatitis B carrier status, and lack of treatment with this antiviral combination were independent predictors of an adverse outcome. Lopinavir/ritonavir treatment was associated with a better outcome even when adjusted for baseline lactate dehydrogenase level. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent favourable clinical response with lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin supports further randomised placebo controlled trials in patients with SARS.
Authors: Christian Drosten; Stephan Günther; Wolfgang Preiser; Sylvie van der Werf; Hans-Reinhard Brodt; Stephan Becker; Holger Rabenau; Marcus Panning; Larissa Kolesnikova; Ron A M Fouchier; Annemarie Berger; Ana-Maria Burguière; Jindrich Cinatl; Markus Eickmann; Nicolas Escriou; Klaus Grywna; Stefanie Kramme; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Stefanie Müller; Volker Rickerts; Martin Stürmer; Simon Vieth; Hans-Dieter Klenk; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Herbert Schmitz; Hans Wilhelm Doerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G R Bernard; A Artigas; K L Brigham; J Carlet; K Falke; L Hudson; M Lamy; J R Legall; A Morris; R Spragg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nelson Lee; David Hui; Alan Wu; Paul Chan; Peter Cameron; Gavin M Joynt; Anil Ahuja; Man Yee Yung; C B Leung; K F To; S F Lui; C C Szeto; Sydney Chung; Joseph J Y Sung Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas G Ksiazek; Dean Erdman; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Sherif R Zaki; Teresa Peret; Shannon Emery; Suxiang Tong; Carlo Urbani; James A Comer; Wilina Lim; Pierre E Rollin; Scott F Dowell; Ai-Ee Ling; Charles D Humphrey; Wun-Ju Shieh; Jeannette Guarner; Christopher D Paddock; Paul Rota; Barry Fields; Joseph DeRisi; Jyh-Yuan Yang; Nancy Cox; James M Hughes; James W LeDuc; William J Bellini; Larry J Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J S M Peiris; S T Lai; L L M Poon; Y Guan; L Y C Yam; W Lim; J Nicholls; W K S Yee; W W Yan; M T Cheung; V C C Cheng; K H Chan; D N C Tsang; R W H Yung; T K Ng; K Y Yuen Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-04-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christl A Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; Gabriel M Leung; Anthony J Hedley; Christophe Fraser; Steven Riley; Laith J Abu-Raddad; Lai-Ming Ho; Thuan-Quoc Thach; Patsy Chau; King-Pan Chan; Tai-Hing Lam; Lai-Yin Tse; Thomas Tsang; Shao-Haei Liu; James H B Kong; Edith M C Lau; Neil M Ferguson; Roy M Anderson Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Loletta K-Y So; Arthur C W Lau; Loretta Y C Yam; Thomas M T Cheung; Edwin Poon; Raymond W H Yung; K Y Yuen Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ron A M Fouchier; Thijs Kuiken; Martin Schutten; Geert van Amerongen; Gerard J J van Doornum; Bernadette G van den Hoogen; Malik Peiris; Wilina Lim; Klaus Stöhr; Albert D M E Osterhaus Journal: Nature Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Krzysztof Pyrc; Berend Jan Bosch; Ben Berkhout; Maarten F Jebbink; Ronald Dijkman; Peter Rottier; Lia van der Hoek Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: John H Beigel; Hannah H Nam; Peter L Adams; Amy Krafft; William L Ince; Samer S El-Kamary; Amy C Sims Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Maria Vega Brizneda; Agam Bansal; Vardhmaan Jain; Samir Kapadia; Lars G Svensson; Venu Menon; Paul Cremer; Grant Reed; Penelope Rampersad; Richard Grimm; Brian P Griffin; Bo Xu Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2021-06
Authors: A C Ghani; C A Donnelly; D R Cox; J T Griffin; C Fraser; T H Lam; L M Ho; W S Chan; R M Anderson; A J Hedley; G M Leung Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-08-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jessica P Ridgway; Brianna Farley; Jean-Luc Benoit; Christopher Frohne; Aniruddha Hazra; Natasha Pettit; Mai Pho; Kenneth Pursell; Jina Saltzman; Jessica Schmitt; Arno Ziggy Uvin; David Pitrak; Moira McNulty Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 5.078