| Literature DB >> 32514167 |
Claire R Peart1,2, Sergio Tusso1,2, Saurabh D Pophaly2,3, Fidel Botero-Castro2, Chi-Chih Wu1, David Aurioles-Gamboa4, Amy B Baird5, John W Bickham6, Jaume Forcada7, Filippo Galimberti8, Neil J Gemmell9, Joseph I Hoffman7,10, Kit M Kovacs11, Mervi Kunnasranta12,13, Christian Lydersen11, Tommi Nyman12,14, Larissa Rosa de Oliveira15, Anthony J Orr16, Simona Sanvito8, Mia Valtonen17, Aaron B A Shafer18,19, Jochen B W Wolf20,21.
Abstract
The effective size of a population (Ne), which determines its level of neutral variability, is a key evolutionary parameter. Ne can substantially depart from census sizes of present-day breeding populations (NC) as a result of past demographic changes, variation in life-history traits and selection at linked sites. Using genome-wide data we estimated the long-term coalescent Ne for 17 pinniped species represented by 36 population samples (total n = 458 individuals). Ne estimates ranged from 8,936 to 91,178, were highly consistent within (sub)species and showed a strong positive correlation with NC ([Formula: see text] = 0.59; P = 0.0002). Ne/NC ratios were low (mean, 0.31; median, 0.13) and co-varied strongly with demographic history and, to a lesser degree, with species' ecological and life-history variables such as breeding habitat. Residual variation in Ne/NC, after controlling for past demographic fluctuations, contained information about recent population size changes during the Anthropocene. Specifically, species of conservation concern typically had positive residuals indicative of a smaller contemporary NC than would be expected from their long-term Ne. This study highlights the value of comparative population genomic analyses for gauging the evolutionary processes governing genetic variation in natural populations, and provides a framework for identifying populations deserving closer conservation attention.Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32514167 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1215-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Ecol Evol ISSN: 2397-334X Impact factor: 15.460