Literature DB >> 27530910

Making sense of the relationships between Ne, Nb and Nc towards defining conservation thresholds in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

A-L Ferchaud1, C Perrier1,2, J April3, C Hernandez1, M Dionne3, L Bernatchez1.   

Abstract

Effective population size over a generation (Ne) or over a reproductive cycle (Nb) and the adult census size (Nc) are important parameters in both conservation and evolutionary biology. Ne provides information regarding the rate of loss of genetic diversity and can be tracked back in time to infer demographic history of populations, whereas Nb may often be more easily quantified than Nc for short-term abundance monitoring. In this study, we propose (1) an empirical context to Waples et al. (2014) who introduced a correction to bias due to overlapping generations, and (2) a mathematical relationship between Ne and Nb for direct application in Atlantic salmon populations in Québec, Canada. To achieve this, we investigate the relationships between Ne, Nb and Nc in 10 Atlantic salmon populations, Canada, for which we genotyped 100 randomly sampled young-of-the year individuals for 5 consecutive years. The results show a positive correlation between Ne, Nb and Nc, suggesting that Nb is an indicative parameter for tracking effective population size and abundance of Atlantic salmon. However, our model allows predicting Nc from Nb values at 27% that can be partly explained by high variance in Nb/Nc both among populations (37%) and among years (19%). This result illustrates the need for thorough calibration of Nb/Nc before using Nb in monitoring programs, as well as a full understanding of the limits of such an approach. Finally, we discuss the importance of these results for the management of wild populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27530910      PMCID: PMC5026759          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  47 in total

1.  Effective size of fluctuating salmon populations.

Authors:  Robin S Waples
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  When are genetic methods useful for estimating contemporary abundance and detecting population trends?

Authors:  David A Tallmon; Dave Gregovich; Robin S Waples; C Scott Baker; Jennifer Jackson; Barbara L Taylor; Eric Archer; Karen K Martien; Fred W Allendorf; Michael K Schwartz
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  ldne: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Chi DO
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Inferences about linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Does catch and release affect the mating system and individual reproductive success of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)?

Authors:  Antoine Richard; Mélanie Dionne; Jinliang Wang; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Historical analysis of genetic variation reveals low effective population size in a northern pike (Esox lucius) population.

Authors:  L M Miller; A R Kapuscinski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Effective population sizes and migration rates in fragmented populations of an endangered insect (Coenagrion mercuriale: Odonata).

Authors:  Phillip C Watts; Ilik J Saccheri; Stephen J Kemp; David J Thompson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Life history and demographic determinants of effective/census size ratios as exemplified by brown trout (Salmo trutta).

Authors:  Dimitar Serbezov; Per Erik Jorde; Louis Bernatchez; Esben Moland Olsen; Leif Asbjørn Vøllestad
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Temporal stability of genetic variability and differentiation in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Jacquelin DeFaveri; Juha Merilä
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effective population size in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  M Husemann; F E Zachos; R J Paxton; J C Habel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Determinants of genetic variation across eco-evolutionary scales in pinnipeds.

Authors:  Claire R Peart; Sergio Tusso; Saurabh D Pophaly; Fidel Botero-Castro; Chi-Chih Wu; David Aurioles-Gamboa; Amy B Baird; John W Bickham; Jaume Forcada; Filippo Galimberti; Neil J Gemmell; Joseph I Hoffman; Kit M Kovacs; Mervi Kunnasranta; Christian Lydersen; Tommi Nyman; Larissa Rosa de Oliveira; Anthony J Orr; Simona Sanvito; Mia Valtonen; Aaron B A Shafer; Jochen B W Wolf
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Considering sampling bias in close-kin mark-recapture abundance estimates of Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Sebastian Wacker; Hans J Skaug; Torbjørn Forseth; Øyvind Solem; Eva M Ulvan; Peder Fiske; Sten Karlsson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Can effective population size estimates be used to monitor population trends of woodland bats? A case study of Myotis bechsteinii.

Authors:  Patrick G R Wright; Henry Schofield; Fiona Mathews
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Genetic Analysis and Status of Brown Bear Sub-Populations in Three National Parks of Greece Functioning as Strongholds for the Species' Conservation.

Authors:  Tzoulia-Maria Tsalazidou-Founta; Evangelia A Stasi; Maria Samara; Yorgos Mertzanis; Maria Papathanassiou; Pantelis G Bagos; Spyros Psaroudas; Vasiliki Spyrou; Yorgos Lazarou; Athanasios Tragos; Yannis Tsaknakis; Elpida Grigoriadou; Athanasios Korakis; Maria Satra; Charalambos Billinis
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.141

6.  Population genomic monitoring provides insight into conservation status but no correlation with demographic estimates of extinction risk in a threatened trout.

Authors:  William Hemstrom; Daniel Dauwalter; Mary M Peacock; Douglas Leasure; Seth Wenger; Michael R Miller; Helen Neville
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes.

Authors:  Matthew Carl Yates; Thais A Bernos; Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Considerations for monitoring population trends of colonial waterbirds using the effective number of breeders and census estimates.

Authors:  Fagner M da Silva; Carolina I Miño; Rafael Izbicki; Silvia N Del Lama
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.