Literature DB >> 32493795

In vivo base editing restores sensory transduction and transiently improves auditory function in a mouse model of recessive deafness.

Wei-Hsi Yeh1,2,3, Olga Shubina-Oleinik4, Jonathan M Levy1,2, Bifeng Pan4, Gregory A Newby1,2, Michael Wornow1,2, Rachel Burt5, Jonathan C Chen1,2, Jeffrey R Holt6,7, David R Liu8,2,9.   

Abstract

Most genetic diseases arise from recessive point mutations that require correction, rather than disruption, of the pathogenic allele to benefit patients. Base editing has the potential to directly repair point mutations and provide therapeutic restoration of gene function. Mutations of transmembrane channel-like 1 gene (TMC1) can cause dominant or recessive deafness. We developed a base editing strategy to treat Baringo mice, which carry a recessive, loss-of-function point mutation (c.A545G; resulting in the substitution p.Y182C) in Tmc1 that causes deafness. Tmc1 encodes a protein that forms mechanosensitive ion channels in sensory hair cells of the inner ear and is required for normal auditory function. We found that sensory hair cells of Baringo mice have a complete loss of auditory sensory transduction. To repair the mutation, we tested several optimized cytosine base editors (CBEmax variants) and guide RNAs in Baringo mouse embryonic fibroblasts. We packaged the most promising CBE, derived from an activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), into dual adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) using a split-intein delivery system. The dual AID-CBEmax AAVs were injected into the inner ears of Baringo mice at postnatal day 1. Injected mice showed up to 51% reversion of the Tmc1 c.A545G point mutation to wild-type sequence (c.A545A) in Tmc1 transcripts. Repair of Tmc1 in vivo restored inner hair cell sensory transduction and hair cell morphology and transiently rescued low-frequency hearing 4 weeks after injection. These findings provide a foundation for a potential one-time treatment for recessive hearing loss and support further development of base editing to correct pathogenic point mutations.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32493795      PMCID: PMC8167884          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay9101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  68 in total

1.  Developmental acquisition of sensory transduction in hair cells of the mouse inner ear.

Authors:  Gwénaëlle S G Géléoc; Jeffrey R Holt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-14       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Tmc gene therapy restores auditory function in deaf mice.

Authors:  Charles Askew; Cylia Rochat; Bifeng Pan; Yukako Asai; Hena Ahmed; Erin Child; Bernard L Schneider; Patrick Aebischer; Jeffrey R Holt
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Mechanotransduction in mouse inner ear hair cells requires transmembrane channel-like genes.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kawashima; Gwenaëlle S G Géléoc; Kiyoto Kurima; Valentina Labay; Andrea Lelli; Yukako Asai; Tomoko Makishima; Doris K Wu; Charles C Della Santina; Jeffrey R Holt; Andrew J Griffith
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Dominant and recessive deafness caused by mutations of a novel gene, TMC1, required for cochlear hair-cell function.

Authors:  Kiyoto Kurima; Linda M Peters; Yandan Yang; Saima Riazuddin; Zubair M Ahmed; Sadaf Naz; Deidre Arnaud; Stacy Drury; Jianhong Mo; Tomoko Makishima; Manju Ghosh; P S N Menon; Dilip Deshmukh; Carole Oddoux; Harry Ostrer; Shaheen Khan; Sheikh Riazuddin; Prescott L Deininger; Lori L Hampton; Susan L Sullivan; James F Battey; Bronya J B Keats; Edward R Wilcox; Thomas B Friedman; Andrew J Griffith
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Mutations in TMC1 contribute significantly to nonsyndromic autosomal recessive sensorineural hearing loss: a report of five novel mutations.

Authors:  Asli Sirmaci; Duygu Duman; Hatice Oztürkmen-Akay; Seyra Erbek; Armağan Incesulu; Burcu Oztürk-Hişmi; Z Serap Arici; E Berrin Yüksel-Konuk; Seda Taşir-Yilmaz; Suna Tokgöz-Yilmaz; Filiz Başak Cengiz; Idil Aslan; Müzeyyen Yildirim; Aylin Hasanefendioğlu-Bayrak; Abdullah Ayçiçek; Ismail Yilmaz; Suat Fitoz; Fazilet Altin; Hilal Ozdağ; Mustafa Tekin
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  TMC1 and TMC2 Localize at the Site of Mechanotransduction in Mammalian Inner Ear Hair Cell Stereocilia.

Authors:  Kiyoto Kurima; Seham Ebrahim; Bifeng Pan; Miloslav Sedlacek; Prabuddha Sengupta; Bryan A Millis; Runjia Cui; Hiroshi Nakanishi; Taro Fujikawa; Yoshiyuki Kawashima; Byung Yoon Choi; Kelly Monahan; Jeffrey R Holt; Andrew J Griffith; Bechara Kachar
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  A synthetic AAV vector enables safe and efficient gene transfer to the mammalian inner ear.

Authors:  Lukas D Landegger; Bifeng Pan; Charles Askew; Sarah J Wassmer; Sarah D Gluck; Alice Galvin; Ruth Taylor; Andrew Forge; Konstantina M Stankovic; Jeffrey R Holt; Luk H Vandenberghe
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Rescue of hearing and vestibular function by antisense oligonucleotides in a mouse model of human deafness.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Francine M Jodelka; Anthony J Hinrich; Kate E McCaffrey; Hamilton E Farris; Matthew J Spalitta; Nicolas G Bazan; Dominik M Duelli; Frank Rigo; Michelle L Hastings
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects.

Authors:  Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Vikram Pattanayak; Michelle S Prew; Shengdar Q Tsai; Nhu T Nguyen; Zongli Zheng; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  CRISPR therapeutic tools for complex genetic disorders and cancer (Review).

Authors:  Stella Baliou; Maria Adamaki; Anthony M Kyriakopoulos; Demetrios A Spandidos; Mihalis Panayiotidis; Ioannis Christodoulou; Vassilis Zoumpourlis
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.650

View more
  40 in total

1.  Is microfluidics the "assembly line" for CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing?

Authors:  Fatemeh Ahmadi; Angela B V Quach; Steve C C Shih
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Base editing rescues hearing in mice.

Authors:  M Teresa Villanueva
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Adenine Base Editing In Vivo with a Single Adeno-Associated Virus Vector.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Nathan Bamidele; Pengpeng Liu; Ogooluwa Ojelabi; Xin D Gao; Tomás Rodriguez; Haoyang Cheng; Karen Kelly; Jonathan K Watts; Jun Xie; Guangping Gao; Scot A Wolfe; Wen Xue; Erik J Sontheimer
Journal:  GEN Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Efficient in vivo base editing via single adeno-associated viruses with size-optimized genomes encoding compact adenine base editors.

Authors:  Jessie R Davis; Xiao Wang; Isaac P Witte; Tony P Huang; Jonathan M Levy; Aditya Raguram; Samagya Banskota; Nabil G Seidah; Kiran Musunuru; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 29.234

Review 5.  Therapeutic in vivo delivery of gene editing agents.

Authors:  Aditya Raguram; Samagya Banskota; David R Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 66.850

6.  A precise and efficient adenine base editor.

Authors:  Tianxiang Tu; Zongming Song; Xiaoyu Liu; Shengxing Wang; Xiaoxue He; Haitao Xi; Jiahua Wang; Tong Yan; Haoran Chen; Zhenwu Zhang; Xiujuan Lv; Jineng Lv; Xiu-Feng Huang; Junzhao Zhao; Chao-Po Lin; Caixia Gao; Jinwei Zhang; Feng Gu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.910

7.  Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Tony P Huang; Gregory A Newby; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing.

Authors:  Gregory A Newby; David R Liu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  Gene editing in a Myo6 semi-dominant mouse model rescues auditory function.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Xue; Xinde Hu; Daqi Wang; Di Li; Yige Li; Fang Wang; Mingqian Huang; Xi Gu; Zhijiao Xu; Jinan Zhou; Jinghan Wang; Renjie Chai; Jun Shen; Zheng-Yi Chen; Geng-Lin Li; Hui Yang; Huawei Li; Erwei Zuo; Yilai Shu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 11.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.