Literature DB >> 35811581

Adenine Base Editing In Vivo with a Single Adeno-Associated Virus Vector.

Han Zhang1, Nathan Bamidele1, Pengpeng Liu2, Ogooluwa Ojelabi1, Xin D Gao1, Tomás Rodriguez1, Haoyang Cheng1, Karen Kelly1, Jonathan K Watts1,3,4, Jun Xie5,6,7,8, Guangping Gao5,6,7,8, Scot A Wolfe2,8, Wen Xue1,2,8,9, Erik J Sontheimer1,8,9.   

Abstract

Base editors (BEs) have opened new avenues for the treatment of genetic diseases. However, advances in delivery approaches are needed to enable disease targeting of a broad range of tissues and cell types. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors remain one of the most promising delivery vehicles for gene therapies. Currently, most BE/guide combinations and their promoters exceed the packaging limit (∼5 kb) of AAVs. Dual-AAV delivery strategies often require high viral doses that impose safety concerns. In this study, we engineered an adenine base editor (ABE) using a compact Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis (Nme2Cas9). Compared with the well-characterized Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9-containing ABEs, ABEs using Nme2Cas9 (Nme2-ABE) possess a distinct protospacer adjacent motif (N4CC) and editing window, exhibit fewer off-target effects, and can efficiently install therapeutically relevant mutations in both human and mouse genomes. Importantly, we show that in vivo delivery of Nme2-ABE and its guide RNA by a single AAV vector can efficiently edit mouse genomic loci and revert the disease mutation and phenotype in an adult mouse model of tyrosinemia. We anticipate that Nme2-ABE, by virtue of its compact size and broad targeting range, will enable a range of therapeutic applications with improved safety and efficacy due in part to packaging in a single-vector system. Copyright 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35811581      PMCID: PMC9258002          DOI: 10.1089/genbio.2022.0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GEN Biotechnol        ISSN: 2768-1556


  86 in total

1.  Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 with Bacteriophage Proteins.

Authors:  Benjamin J Rauch; Melanie R Silvis; Judd F Hultquist; Christopher S Waters; Michael J McGregor; Nevan J Krogan; Joseph Bondy-Denomy
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Rationally Designed Base Editors for Precise Editing of the Sickle Cell Disease Mutation.

Authors:  S Haihua Chu; Michael Packer; Holly Rees; Dieter Lam; Yi Yu; Jeffrey Marshall; Lo-I Cheng; Daisy Lam; Jenny Olins; Fei Ann Ran; Alexander Liquori; Bob Gantzer; Jeremy Decker; David Born; Luis Barrera; Adam Hartigan; Nicole Gaudelli; Giuseppe Ciaramella; Ian M Slaymaker
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2021-04

3.  RettBASE: Rett syndrome database update.

Authors:  Rahul Krishnaraj; Gladys Ho; John Christodoulou
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Point mutations in the murine fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase gene: Animal models for the human genetic disorder hereditary tyrosinemia type 1.

Authors:  J L Aponte; G A Sega; L J Hauser; M S Dhar; C M Withrow; D A Carpenter; E M Rinchik; C T Culiat; D K Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Luke W Koblan; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Effect of genome size on AAV vector packaging.

Authors:  Zhijian Wu; Hongyan Yang; Peter Colosi
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Development of a gene-editing approach to restore vision loss in Leber congenital amaurosis type 10.

Authors:  Morgan L Maeder; Michael Stefanidakis; Christopher J Wilson; Reshica Baral; Luis Alberto Barrera; George S Bounoutas; David Bumcrot; Hoson Chao; Dawn M Ciulla; Jennifer A DaSilva; Abhishek Dass; Vidya Dhanapal; Tim J Fennell; Ari E Friedland; Georgia Giannoukos; Sebastian W Gloskowski; Alexandra Glucksmann; Gregory M Gotta; Hariharan Jayaram; Scott J Haskett; Bei Hopkins; Joy E Horng; Shivangi Joshi; Eugenio Marco; Rina Mepani; Deepak Reyon; Terence Ta; Diana G Tabbaa; Steven J Samuelsson; Shen Shen; Maxwell N Skor; Pam Stetkiewicz; Tongyao Wang; Clifford Yudkoff; Vic E Myer; Charles F Albright; Haiyan Jiang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo.

Authors:  Nicole K Paulk; Karsten Wursthorn; Zhongya Wang; Milton J Finegold; Mark A Kay; Markus Grompe
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Broader Implications of Progressive Liver Dysfunction and Lethal Sepsis in Two Boys following Systemic High-Dose AAV.

Authors:  Leon Morales; Yuva Gambhir; Jean Bennett; Hansell H Stedman
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  Targeted exon skipping with AAV-mediated split adenine base editors.

Authors:  Jackson Winter; Alan Luu; Michael Gapinske; Sony Manandhar; Shraddha Shirguppe; Wendy S Woods; Jun S Song; Pablo Perez-Pinera
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 10.849

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficient in vivo base editing via single adeno-associated viruses with size-optimized genomes encoding compact adenine base editors.

Authors:  Jessie R Davis; Xiao Wang; Isaac P Witte; Tony P Huang; Jonathan M Levy; Aditya Raguram; Samagya Banskota; Nabil G Seidah; Kiran Musunuru; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 29.234

Review 2.  Therapeutic in vivo delivery of gene editing agents.

Authors:  Aditya Raguram; Samagya Banskota; David R Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 66.850

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.