Literature DB >> 32458102

IUI and uterine lavage of in vivo-produced blastocysts for PGT purposes: is it a technically and ethically reasonable perspective? Is it actually needed?

Lucia De Santis1, Danilo Cimadomo2, Antonio Capalbo3,4, Cinzia Di Pietro5, Daniela Zuccarello6, Attilio Anastasi7, Emanuele Licata8, Catello Scarica9, Laura Sosa Fernandez10, Francesca Gioia Klinger11.   

Abstract

A recent study by Munné et al. portrayed a protocol to retrieve in vivo produced blastocysts after IUI and uterine lavage for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) purposes. The authors claimed this protocol might represent a reasonable future perspective for patients who do not want to undergo IVF, but still want to be informed about their embryos' genetic/chromosomal defects. Although the intent of making PGT available also to patients who cannot or do not need to undergo IVF is respectable, the value of this study is undermined by severe technical and ethical issues. Munné and colleagues' paper was discussed within the executive committee (i.e., president and vice-president of the society, director and vice-director of the scientific committee, secretariat, and counselors), the special interest group in reproductive genetics, the scientific committee, and the collegio dei probiviri of the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR). The points raised from this discussion are summarized in this opinion paper.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst; Ethics; PGT; Preimplantation development; Uterine lavage

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32458102      PMCID: PMC7376991          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01813-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  16 in total

1.  Extended in vitro culture of human embryos demonstrates the complex nature of diagnosing chromosomal mosaicism from a single trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  M Popovic; L Dhaenens; J Taelman; A Dheedene; M Bialecka; P De Sutter; S M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; B Menten; B Heindryckx
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening.

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Kathleen M Upham; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Euploidy rates in donor egg cycles significantly differ between fertility centers.

Authors:  S Munné; M Alikani; L Ribustello; P Colls; Pedro A Martínez-Ortiz; D H McCulloh
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Kathleen M Upham; Eric J Forman; Tian Zhao; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Incidence, Origin, and Predictive Model for the Detection and Clinical Management of Segmental Aneuploidies in Human Embryos.

Authors:  Laura Girardi; Munevver Serdarogullari; Cristina Patassini; Maurizio Poli; Marco Fabiani; Silvia Caroselli; Onder Coban; Necati Findikli; Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Mustafa Bahceci; Rupali Chopra; Rita Canipari; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Ubaldi; Eva Hoffmann; Carmen Rubio; Carlos Simon; Antonio Capalbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma.

Authors:  Mina Popovic; Lien Dhaenens; Annekatrien Boel; Björn Menten; Björn Heindryckx
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  First PGT-A using human in vivo blastocysts recovered by uterine lavage: comparison with matched IVF embryo controls†.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Steven T Nakajima; Sam Najmabadi; Mark V Sauer; Marlane J Angle; José L Rivas; Laura V Mendieta; Thelma M Macaso; Sarthak Sawarkar; Alexander Nadal; Kajal Choudhary; Camran Nezhat; Sandra A Carson; John E Buster
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Prevalence of chromosomal mosaicism in pregnancies from couples with infertility.

Authors:  Andy Huang; Jasvant Adusumalli; Satin Patel; Jennifer Liem; John Williams; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  A randomized and blinded comparison of qPCR and NGS-based detection of aneuploidy in a cell line mixture model of blastocyst biopsy mosaicism.

Authors:  David Goodrich; Xin Tao; Chelsea Bohrer; Agnieszka Lonczak; Tongji Xing; Rebekah Zimmerman; Yiping Zhan; Richard T Scott; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2586 embryo biopsies.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Danilo Cimadomo; Roberta Maggiulli; Cristina Patassini; Ludovica Dusi; Federica Sanges; Laura Buffo; Roberta Venturella; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  2 in total

1.  When pregnancy is a research risk.

Authors:  Ronald M Green
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Medical research and reproductive medicine in an ethical context: a critical commentary on the paper dealing with uterine lavage published by Munné et al.

Authors:  Maximilian Murtinger; Barbara Wirleitner; Libor Hradecký; Giorgio Comploj; Jasmin Okhowat; Dietmar Spitzer; Jürgen Stadler; Robert Haidbauer; Maximilian Schuff; Selma Yildirim; Therese Soepenberg; Kerstin Eibner; Friedrich Gagsteiger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.412

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.