Literature DB >> 28333245

Euploidy rates in donor egg cycles significantly differ between fertility centers.

S Munné1, M Alikani2, L Ribustello1, P Colls1, Pedro A Martínez-Ortiz3, D H McCulloh4.   

Abstract

Study question: Do external factors affect euploidy in egg donor cycles? Summary answer: The study demonstrates that during human assisted reproduction, embryonic chromosome abnormalities may be partly iatrogenic. What is known already: Chromosome abnormalities have been linked in the past to culture conditions such as temperature and Ph variations, as well as hormonal stimulation. Those reports were performed with older screening techniques (FISH), or ART methods no longer in use, and the subjects studied were not a homogeneous group. Study design, size, duration: A total of 1645 donor oocyte cycles and 13 282 blastocyst biopsies from 42 fertility clinics were included in this retrospective cohort study. Samples from donor cycles with PGS attempted between September 2011 and July 2015 were included. Participants/materials, setting, methods: PGS cycles from multiple fertility clinics referred to Reprogenetics (Livingston, NJ) that involved only oocyte donation were included in this study. Testing was performed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Ploidy data were analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models with logistic regression using a logit link function considering a number of variables that represent fixed and random effects. Main results and the role of chance: Euploidy rate was associated with the referring center and independent of almost all the parameters examined except donor age and testing technology. Average euploidy rate per center ranged from 39.5 to 82.5%. The mean expected rate of euploidy was 68.4%, but there are variations in this rate associated with the center effect. Limitations, reasons for caution: Data set does not include details of the donor selection process, donor race or ethnic origin, ovarian reserve or ovarian responsiveness. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, associations are apparent, however, causality cannot be established. Discrepancies in regard to completeness and homogeneity of data exist due to data collection from over 40 different clinics. Wider implications of the findings: This is the first study to show a strong association between center-specific ART treatment practices and the incidence of chromosome abnormality in human embryos, although the meiotic or mitotic origin of these abnormalities could not be determined using these technologies. Given the widespread applications of ART in both subfertile and fertile populations, our findings should be of interest to the medical community in general as well as the ART community in particular. Study funding/competing interest(s): No external funds were used for this study. S. Munne is a founding principle of Reprogenetics/current employee of Cooper Genomics. M Alikani's spouse is a founding principle of Reprogenetics/current consultant for Cooper Genomics. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART; PGS; aneuploidy; donor oocytes; euploidy; mosaicism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28333245     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  23 in total

1.  Issues related to human oocyte vitrification: a consideration of the facts.

Authors:  Samer Tannus; Michael-Haim Dahan; Justin Tan; Seang-Lin Tan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  IUI and uterine lavage of in vivo-produced blastocysts for PGT purposes: is it a technically and ethically reasonable perspective? Is it actually needed?

Authors:  Lucia De Santis; Danilo Cimadomo; Antonio Capalbo; Cinzia Di Pietro; Daniela Zuccarello; Attilio Anastasi; Emanuele Licata; Catello Scarica; Laura Sosa Fernandez; Francesca Gioia Klinger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Euploid rates among oocyte donors: is there an optimal age for donation?

Authors:  Luis R Hoyos; Connie Y Cheng; Kathleen Brennan; Gary Hubert; Brandon Wang; Richard P Buyalos; Molly Quinn; Mousa Shamonki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Healthy live births from transfer of low-mosaicism embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Chun-I Lee; En-Hui Cheng; Maw-Sheng Lee; Pin-Yao Lin; Yi-Chun Chen; Chien-Hong Chen; Lii-Shung Huang; Chun-Chia Huang; Tsung-Hsien Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  In vitro fertilization does not increase the incidence of de novo copy number alterations in fetal and placental lineages.

Authors:  Masoud Zamani Esteki; Triin Viltrop; Olga Tšuiko; Airi Tiirats; Mariann Koel; Margit Nõukas; Olga Žilina; Katre Teearu; Heidi Marjonen; Hanna Kahila; Jeroen Meekels; Viveca Söderström-Anttila; Anne-Maria Suikkari; Aila Tiitinen; Reedik Mägi; Sulev Kõks; Nina Kaminen-Ahola; Ants Kurg; Thierry Voet; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Andres Salumets
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Hesperidin improves the follicular development in 3D culture of isolated preantral ovarian follicles of mice.

Authors:  Hamed Shoorei; Majid Banimohammad; Maziar M Kebria; Mohammad Afshar; Mohammad Mh Taheri; Majid Shokoohi; Mohammad Sg Farashah; Mina Eftekharzadeh; Omid Akhiani; Robert Gaspar; Hamidreza Pazoki-Toroudi
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-02-19

7.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies does not increase success rates in fresh oocyte donation cycles: a paired cohort study.

Authors:  Carolina Lumertz Martello; Marcos Iuri Roos Kulmann; Luiza Mezzomo Donatti; Adriana Bos-Mikich; Nilo Frantz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Nicole Doyle; Michelle Gainty; Allison Eubanks; Joseph Doyle; Heidi Hayes; Michael Tucker; Kate Devine; Alan DeCherney; Michael Levy; Samad Jahandideh; Micah Hill
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  First PGT-A using human in vivo blastocysts recovered by uterine lavage: comparison with matched IVF embryo controls†.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Steven T Nakajima; Sam Najmabadi; Mark V Sauer; Marlane J Angle; José L Rivas; Laura V Mendieta; Thelma M Macaso; Sarthak Sawarkar; Alexander Nadal; Kajal Choudhary; Camran Nezhat; Sandra A Carson; John E Buster
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles.

Authors:  Maria Facadio Antero; Bhuchitra Singh; Apoorva Pradhan; Megan Gornet; William G Kearns; Valerie Baker; Mindy S Christianson
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.