Literature DB >> 32220293

Incidence, Origin, and Predictive Model for the Detection and Clinical Management of Segmental Aneuploidies in Human Embryos.

Laura Girardi1, Munevver Serdarogullari2, Cristina Patassini1, Maurizio Poli1, Marco Fabiani1, Silvia Caroselli1, Onder Coban2, Necati Findikli3, Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin4, Mustafa Bahceci4, Rupali Chopra5, Rita Canipari6, Danilo Cimadomo7, Laura Rienzi7, Filippo Ubaldi7, Eva Hoffmann8, Carmen Rubio9, Carlos Simon10, Antonio Capalbo11.   

Abstract

Despite next-generation sequencing, which now allows for the accurate detection of segmental aneuploidies from in vitro fertilization embryo biopsies, the origin and characteristics of these aneuploidies are still relatively unknown. Using a multifocal biopsy approach (four trophectoderms [TEs] and one inner cell mass [ICM] analyzed per blastocyst; n = 390), we determine the origin of the aneuploidy and the diagnostic predictive value of segmental aneuploidy detection in TE biopsies toward the ICM's chromosomal constitution. Contrary to the prevalent meiotic origin of whole-chromosome aneuploidies, we show that sub-chromosomal abnormalities in human blastocysts arise from mitotic errors in around 70% of cases. As a consequence, the positive-predictive value toward ICM configuration was significantly lower for segmental as compared to whole-chromosome aneuploidies (70.8% versus 97.18%, respectively). In order to enhance the clinical utility of reporting segmental findings in clinical TE biopsies, we have developed and clinically verified a risk stratification model based on a second TE biopsy confirmation and segmental length; this model can significantly improve the prediction of aneuploidy risk in the ICM in over 86% of clinical cases enrolled. In conclusion, we provide evidence of the predominant mitotic origin of segmental aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos and develop a risk stratification model that can help post-test genetic counseling and that facilitates the decision-making process on clinical utilization of these embryos.
Copyright © 2020 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; PGT; aneuploidies; meiosis; mitotic aneuploidies; mosaicism; preimplantation embryo; preimplantation genetic testing; preimplnatation genetic screening; segmental abnormalities

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32220293      PMCID: PMC7118577          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  41 in total

1.  Prevalence and authenticity of de-novo segmental aneuploidy (>16 Mb) in human blastocysts as detected by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Shuang Zhou; Dehua Cheng; Qi Ouyang; Pingyuan Xie; Changfu Lu; Fei Gong; Liang Hu; Yueqiu Tan; Guangxiu Lu; Ge Lin
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.

Authors:  Edgardo Somigliana; Andrea Busnelli; Alessio Paffoni; Paola Vigano; Alessandra Riccaboni; Carmen Rubio; Antonio Capalbo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Kathleen M Ferry; Xin Tao; Deanne Taylor; Brynn Levy; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Nathan R Treff; Danilo Cimadomo; Xin Tao; Kathleen Upham; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Mechanical isolation of the inner cell mass is effective in derivation of new human embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Susanne Ström; José Inzunza; Karl-Henrik Grinnemo; Kerstin Holmberg; Eija Matilainen; Anne-Marie Strömberg; Elisabeth Blennow; Outi Hovatta
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Interpreting mosaicism in chorionic villi: results of a monocentric series of 1001 mosaics in chorionic villi with follow-up amniocentesis.

Authors:  Francesca Malvestiti; Cristina Agrati; Beatrice Grimi; Eva Pompilii; Claudia Izzi; Lorenza Martinoni; Elisa Gaetani; Maria Rosaria Liuti; Anna Trotta; Federico Maggi; Giuseppe Simoni; Francesca Romana Grati
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst.

Authors:  Andrea R Victor; Darren K Griffin; Alan J Brake; Jack C Tyndall; Alex E Murphy; Laura T Lepkowsky; Archana Lal; Christo G Zouves; Frank L Barnes; Rajiv C McCoy; Manuel Viotti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Concordance between different trophectoderm biopsy sites and the inner cell mass of chromosomal composition measured with a next-generation sequencing platform.

Authors:  Tzu-Hsuan Chuang; Jhih-Yuan Hsieh; Meng-Ju Lee; Hsing-Hua Lai; Chia-Lin Hsieh; Huai-Lin Wang; Yu-Jen Chang; Shee-Uan Chen
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Segmental aneuploidy in human blastocysts: a qualitative and quantitative overview.

Authors:  María-José Escribà; Xavier Vendrell; Vanessa Peinado
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  22 in total

1.  IUI and uterine lavage of in vivo-produced blastocysts for PGT purposes: is it a technically and ethically reasonable perspective? Is it actually needed?

Authors:  Lucia De Santis; Danilo Cimadomo; Antonio Capalbo; Cinzia Di Pietro; Daniela Zuccarello; Attilio Anastasi; Emanuele Licata; Catello Scarica; Laura Sosa Fernandez; Francesca Gioia Klinger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Gianluca Gennarelli; Maurizio Guido; Carlo Alviggi; Alessandro Conforti; Claudia Livi; Alberto Revelli; Silvia Colamaria; Cindy Argento; Maddalena Giuliani; Carlo De Angelis; Maria Matteo; Stefano Canosa; Angela D'Alfonso; Valentino Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Stressful start causes chromosome errors in human embryos.

Authors:  Tommaso Cavazza; Melina Schuh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 4.  On the reproductive capabilities of aneuploid human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Maurizio Poli; Chaim Jalas; Eric J Forman; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 11.043

5.  When embryology meets genetics: the definition of developmentally incompetent preimplantation embryos (DIPE)-the consensus of two Italian scientific societies.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Antonio Capalbo; Catello Scarica; Laura Sosa Fernandez; Laura Rienzi; Rosanna Ciriminna; Maria Giulia Minasi; Antonio Novelli; Lucia De Santis; Daniela Zuccarello
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-a single-center experience.

Authors:  Jiny Nair; Sachin Shetty; Cynthia Irene Kasi; Nirmala Thondehalmath; Deepanjali Ganesh; Vidyalakshmi R Bhat; Sajana Mannadia; Anjana Ranganath; Rajsekhar Nayak; Devika Gunasheela; Swathi Shetty
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Evaluating the application value of NGS-based PGT-A by screening cryopreserved MDA products of embryos from PGT-M cycles with known transfer outcomes.

Authors:  Xiaoting Shen; Dongjia Chen; Chenhui Ding; Yan Xu; Yu Fu; Bing Cai; Yali Wang; Jing Wang; Rong Li; Jing Guo; Jiafu Pan; Han Zhang; Yanhong Zeng; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Chromosomal mosaicism: Origins and clinical implications in preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Brynn Levy; Eva R Hoffmann; Rajiv C McCoy; Francesca R Grati
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Origins and mechanisms leading to aneuploidy in human eggs.

Authors:  Lena Wartosch; Karen Schindler; Melina Schuh; Jennifer R Gruhn; Eva R Hoffmann; Rajiv C McCoy; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 10.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data.

Authors:  Diego Marin; Jia Xu; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.