| Literature DB >> 32438698 |
Vicente Andreu-Fernández1,2,3,4, Laura Almeida Toledano3,4,5, Nieves Pizarro6,7, Elisabet Navarro-Tapia1,3,4, María Dolores Gómez-Roig3,4,5, Rafael de la Torre6,8, Óscar García-Algar1,4,9.
Abstract
The flavanol epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is being tested for the treatment of several diseases in humans. However, its bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profile needs a better understanding to enable its use in clinical trials. There is no consensus on the most appropriate concentration of EGCG in the body to obtain the maximum therapeutic effects. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the bioavailability of EGCG orally administered alone or with different food supplements after overnight fasting in order to determine its optimal conditions (high concentrations in blood and the lowest interindividual variations) to be used as a pharmacological tool in human trials. Ten healthy volunteers (5 men and 5 women) aged 25 to 35 years were recruited prospectively. Three series of clinical experiments with a washout period of seven days among each were performed: 1) Teavigo® (EGCG extract) alone, 2) Teavigo® with a standard breakfast, and 3) FontUp® (Teavigo® commercially prepared with fats, carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, and minerals). Blood samples were collected at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 360 min after EGCG intake. Free EGCG in plasma was measured using a liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry UPLC-ESI-MS/MS analytical method. The pharmacokinetic variables analyzed statistically were area under the curve (AUC0-360), Cmax, Cav, Cmin, T1/2, and Tmax,. EGCG (Teavigo®) alone was the group with higher AUC0-360, Cmax, and Cav both in men (3.86 ± 4.11 µg/mL/kg/6 h; 5.95 ng/mL/kg; 2.96 ng/mL/kg) and women (3.33 ± 1.08 µg/mL/kg/6 h; 6.66 ng/mL/kg; 3.66 ng/mL). Moreover, FontUp® was the group with the highest value of T1/2 both in men (192 ± 66 min) and women (133 ± 28 min). Teavigo® intake after fasting overnight revealed the highest concentration of EGCG in plasma according to its pharmacokinetic profile, indicating that this is an excellent alternative of administration if the experimental design requires good absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, EGCG taken along with food supplements (FontUp®) improved the stability of the molecule in the body, being the best choice if the experimental design wants to reduce interindividual variation.Entities:
Keywords: EGCG; Epigallocatechin Gallate; Teavigo®, bioavailability; antioxidants; catechins; food supplement; green tea; pharmacokinetic profile; polyphenols
Year: 2020 PMID: 32438698 PMCID: PMC7278615 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9050440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Food supplement FontUp® composition.
| Average Analysis | Per 100 mL | Per Ration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energetic value (kJ/kcal) | 1606/383 | 787/188 | |
| Fats (g) | 11 | 5.4 | |
| Saturated (g) | 4.4 | 2.2 | |
| Monounsaturated (g) | 4.4 | 2.2 | |
| Polyunsaturated (g) | 2.2 | 1.1 | |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, mg) | 5.4 | 2.6 | |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 47 | 23 | |
| Dietary fiber (g) | 16 | 7.9 | |
| Fructo-oligosaccharides (g) | 3.1 | 1.5 | |
| Proteins (g) | 16 | 8 | |
| Salt (g) | 0.52 | 0.3 | |
| Minerals | |||
| Na (mg) | 206 | 101 | |
| K (mg) | 606 | 297 | |
| Cl (mg) | 395 | 194 | |
| Ca (mg) | 221 | 108 | |
| P (mg) | 209 | 102 | |
| Mg (mg) | 106 | 52 | |
| Fe (mg) | 4.6 | 2.3 | |
| Zn (mg) | 3.1 | 1.5 | |
| Cu (μg) | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| Mn (mg) | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| F (μg) | 0.1 | 0.05 | |
| Se (μg) | 10 | 4.9 | |
| Cr (μg) | 16 | 7.8 | |
| Mo (μg) | 10 | 4.9 | |
| I (μg) | 21 | 10 | |
| Vitamins | |||
| Vitamin A (μg) | 251 | 123 | |
| Vitamin D (μg) | 1.9 | 0.9 | |
| Vitamin E (mg) | 4.2 | 2.1 | |
| Vitamin K (μg) | 15.0 | 7.4 | |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 25 | 12 | |
| Thiamine (B1) (mg) | 0.3 | 0.1 | |
| Riboflavin (B2) (mg) | 0.4 | 0.2 | |
| Niacin (B3/PP) (mg) | 4.0 | 2.0 | |
| Vitamin B6 (mg) | 0.4 | 0.2 | |
| Folic acid (B9) (μg) | 80.0 | 39 | |
| Vitamin B12 (μg) | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| Biotin (μg) | 58.0 | 28 | |
| Pantothenic acid (B5) (mg) | 1.9 | 0.9 | |
| Others | |||
| Green tea extract (mg) (minimum 250 mg EGCG) | 543 | 266 | |
| Osmolarity (mOsm/L) | 635 | ||
Nutrients of the standardized breakfast included in the Teavigo® plus breakfast intervention.
| Nutrient | Weight (g) | % ( | kcal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-skimmed milk + Soluble cocoa | 200 | 78.4 | 200 |
| Breakfast cereals | 30 | 11.8 | 120 |
| 2 bread toasts + 5 mL Olive oil | 25 | 9.8 | 160 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 w = weight.
Figure 1Consort flow chart and schematic representation of the study design and the blood sampling: The experimental design includes the study groups, the timeline of blood extractions after the intake of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), and the methodology to analyze the samples. UPLC-ESI-MS/MS = ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry.
Anthropometric data of the participants included in the study.
| Demographic Parameters | Total | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nº of participants | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Age mean (years) | 29.7 ± 4.3 | 30.6 ± 5.2 | 28.8 ± 3.6 |
| Height (cm) | 169 ± 8.8 | 176 ± 5.0 | 163 ± 6.0 |
| Weight (kg) | 63.2 ± 14.4 | 73.8 ± 11.6 | 52.8 ± 7.0 |
| BMI 1 (kg/m2) | 21.8 ± 3.1 | 23.7 ± 2.8 | 19.9 ± 2.1 |
1 BMI = body mass index.
Figure 2LC-MS/MS chromatogram of EGCG showing the most specific and sensitive MS/MS transition m/z 457→169: (a) plasma sample from a volunteer at baseline, (b) blank of plasma spiked with 428 ng/mL of EGCG, and (c) plasma sample from a volunteer at 60 min after Teavigo® ingestion (calculated concentration: 289 ng/mL). LC-MS/MS = liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Figure 3Plasma EGCG concentration–time curves for each of the participants for the three different EGCG preparations: Concentrations for men (a,c,e) and (b,d,f) for women. Teavigo® condition is shown by green lines (a,b), Teavigo® plus breakfast is shown by blue lines (c,d), and FontUp® is shown by red lines (e,f).
Figure 4Averages of EGCG plasma concentrations over time distributed following EGCG preparation and gender: Teavigo® condition is shown in green lines, Teavigo® plus breakfast is in blue lines, and FontUp® is in red lines. (a) EGCG average concentrations for men and (b) EGCG average concentrations for women. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Plasma kinetic parameters for EGCG after the three preparations.
| Parameters | G | Teavigo® | Teavigo® with Breakfast | FontUp® |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC0–360 | ♂ | 3.9 ± 4.1 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.1 ** |
| Cmax (ng/mL/kg) | ♂ | 5.9 ± 4.1 | 3.9 ± 1.3 | 0.9 ± 0.1 ** |
| Cav (ng/mL/kg) | ♂ | 3.0 ± 2.6 | 1.5 ± 1.5 | 0.6 ± 0.2 ** |
| Cmin (ng/mL/kg) | ♂ | 1.5 ± 1.4 | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.1 * |
| T1/2 (min) | ♂ | 154.2 ± 27.9 | 93.1 ± 36.2 * | 191.7 ± 66.4 |
| Tmax (min) | ♂ | 120 (90–180) | 120 (90–180) | 90 (60–90) |
Values are means ± standard deviations for the 10 participants (n = 10), except for Tmax (median with the minimum and maximum time observed). * Value is significantly different from the other values in the row at the level of p < 0.05. ** Value is significantly different from the other values in the row at the level of p < 0.001. Abbreviations: G = gender; min = minutes; h = hours; ♂ = man; ♀ = women; AUC0–360 = area under the curve from 0 to 6 h; Cmax = maximum concentration; Cav = average concentration; Cmin = minimum concentration (at the end of the treatment); T1/2 = half-life; Tmax = time required to reach the maximal concentration.
Figure A1Comparison of the EGCG means distributed by delivery method and gender: Concentrations for women are showed by grey lines and, for men, by black lines. (a) Teavigo® alone, (b) Teavigo® plus breakfast, and (c) FontUp®. Each value was obtained by HPLC-MS analysis.
Plasma kinetic parameters for EGCG after the three different series of experiments.
| Parameters | N | Teavigo® | Teavigo® with Breakfast | FontUp® |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC0–360 | ♂ | 270.4 ± 288.2 | 108.6 ± 40.7 | 38.5 ± 5.8 ** |
| Cmax (ng/mL) | ♂ | 528.6 ± 472.3 | 275.3 ± 89.1 | 63.7 ± 7.7 ** |
| Cav (ng/mL) | ♂ | 271.4 ± 299.2 | 108.4 ± 102.3 | 42.8 ± 16.6 ** |
| Cmin (ng/mL) | ♂ | 148.7 ± 188.1 | 50.1 ± 30.6 | 20.9 ± 4.8 * |
| T1/2 (min) | ♂ | 154.2 ± 27.9 | 93.1 ± 36.2 * | 191.7 ± 66.4 |
| Tmax (min) | ♂ | 120 (90–180) | 120 (90–180) | 90 (60–90) |
Values are means ± standard deviations for the 10 participants (n = 10), except for Tmax (median with the minimum and maximum time observed). * Value is significantly different from the other values in the row at the level of p < 0.05. ** Value is significantly different from the other values in the row at the level of p < 0.001. Abbreviations: G = gender; min = minutes; h = hours; ♂ = man; ♀ = women; AUC0–360 = area under the curve from 0 to 6 h; Cmax = maximum concentration; Cav = average concentration; Cmin = minimum concentration (at the end of the treatment); T1/2 = half-life; Tmax = time required to reach the maximal concentration.
Figure 5Mean plasma concentration time profiles of EGCG for the three different EGCG interventions by the oral route: Green line represents Teavigo®, blue line represents Teavigo® plus breakfast, and red line represents FontUp®. Each value was obtained by HPLC-MS analysis. Error bars represent the standard deviation.