| Literature DB >> 29429153 |
Hirota Fujiki1, Tatsuro Watanabe1, Eisaburo Sueoka1, Anchalee Rawangkan2, Masami Suganuma2.
Abstract
Cancer preventive activities of green tea and its main constituent, (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) have been extensively studied by scientists all over the world. Since 1983, we have studied the cancer chemopreventive effects of EGCG as well as green tea extract and underlying molecular mechanisms. The first part of this review summarizes ground-breaking topics with EGCG and green tea extract: 1) Delayed cancer onset as revealed by a 10-year prospective cohort study, 2) Prevention of colorectal adenoma recurrence by a double-blind randomized clinical phase II trial, 3) Inhibition of metastasis of B16 melanoma cells to the lungs of mice, 4) Increase in the average value of Young's moduli, i.e., cell stiffness, for human lung cancer cell lines and inhibition of cell motility and 5) Synergistic enhancement of anticancer activity against human cancer cell lines with the combination of EGCG and anticancer compounds. In the second part, we became interested in cancer stem cells (CSCs). 1) Cancer stem cells in mouse skin carcinogenesis by way of introduction, after which we discuss two subjects from our review on human CSCs reported by other investigators gathered from a search of PubMed, 2) Expression of stemness markers of human CSCs compared with their parental cells, and 3) EGCG decreases or increases the expression of mRNA and protein in human CSCs. On this point, EGCG inhibited self-renewal and expression of pluripotency-maintaining transcription factors in human CSCs. Human CSCs are thus a target for cancer prevention and treatment with EGCG and green tea catechins.Entities:
Keywords: AFM; Nanog; Oct4; Sox2; stemness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29429153 PMCID: PMC5824026 DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2018.2227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cells ISSN: 1016-8478 Impact factor: 5.034
Fig. 1Primary, secondary, and tertiary cancer prevention in humans
Fig. 2Schematic illustration of mechanisms of EGCG in relation to “Sealing effects of EGCG”
Daily green tea consumption and average age at cancer onset*
| Gender | Daily consumption of green tea (cups) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| ≤3 | 4 – 9 | ≥10 | |
| Average age at cancer onset (% of patients) | |||
| Female (175) | 67.0 ± 1.7 (28.0%) | 66.4 ± 1.3 (58.3%) | 74.3 ± 2.2 (13.7%) |
| Male (244) | 65.0 ± 1.5 (24.2%) | 67.2 ± 1.0 (46.7%) | 68.2 ± 1.1 (29.1%) |
All different types of cancer are included,
P < 0.01
Recurrence rate of breast cancer in relation to daily consumption of green tea
| Daily green tea consumption | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Parameter | ≤4 cups | ≥5 cups |
| Stages I and II (390 patients) | ||
| Recurrence rate (%) | 24.3 | 16.7 |
| Disease-free period (years) | 2.8 | 3.6 |
| Stage III (82 patients) | ||
| Recurrence rate (%) | 48.8 | 58.5 |
| Disease-free period (years) | 1.9 | 1.9 |
P < 0.05 in terms of the Cox proportional hazards model.
Phase II prevention trial of colorectal adenoma recurrence of patients drinking a combination of daily green tea beverage and tablets of G.T.E
| Study in Japan | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Groups (cases) | Recurrence rate % | Size of relapsed adenomas (mm) |
| Control (20/65) | 31.0 | 4.0 ± 1.3 |
| G.T.E (9/60) | 15.0 | 3.0 ± 1.0 |
|
| ||
| Study in Korea | ||
|
| ||
| Groups (cases) | Recurrence rate % | Size of the largest polyps (mm) |
|
| ||
| Control (43/71) | 60.6 | 4.8 ± 2.4 |
| G.T.E (20/72) | 27.8 | 4.8 ± 2.3 |
P < 0.05
P < 0.001
Inhibition of lung metastasis of B16 melanoma cells with peroral administration of EGCG
| Hematogenous metastasis with B16-F10 cells | Lymphogenous metastasis with B16-BL6 cells | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Groups | Average number of lung nodules | % of inhibition | Average number of lung nodules | % of inhibition |
| Control | >150 | 25 | ||
| 0.05% EGCG | 107 | >29% | 7 | 72% |
| 0.1% EGCG | 76 | >50% | 10 | 60% |
P < 0.01
Average values of Young’s moduli and inhibition of cell motility for B16-F10 mouse melanoma cells
| EGCG (μM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 0 | 50 | 100 | 200 | |
| Young’s moduli (kPa) | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.80 ± 0.02 |
| Cell motility (%) | 100 | 57.1 | 30.3 | 12.6 |
P < 0.001
P < 0.0001
Increase of average values of Young’s moduli for human lung cancer cell lines by treatment with EGCG
| EGCG (μM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Cell lines | 0 | 5 | 50 |
| H1299 (kPa) | 1.24 ± 0.05 | 2.30 ± 0.07 | 2.25 ± 0.11 |
| Lu99 (kPa) | 1.29 ± 0.11 | 1.63 ± 0.08 | 2.28 ± 0.09 |
P < 0.0001
Reduction of tumor volume in xenograft mouse models implanted using human cancer cell lines after treatment with the combination of EGCG and anticancer drugs
| Tumor volume (% of control) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Cancer cell line | Name of drugs | Vehicle (control) | EGCG alone | Anticancer drugs alone | Combinations | References |
| Prostate cancer cell lines | ||||||
| PC-3ML | Paclitaxel | 100 | 40.9 | 44.3 | 0 | |
| Docetaxel | 100 | 54.1 | 42.4 | 0 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Average reduction of tumor volume (% of control) | 100 | 73.5 | 66.3 | 29.7 | ||
228 mg/kg EGCG
Human CSCs express stemness markers differentially
| Cancers types and names of CSCs | Markers of increased expression | Markers of decreased expression | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCT116-SDCSCs | mRNAs: | |||
| Proteins: | CD44, Notch, Bmi-1, CD133, ALDH1 | |||
|
| ||||
| TW01 sphere | mRNAs: | |||
EGCG decreases or increases the expression of stemness marker mRNAs and proteins in human CSCs.
| Cancer types and names of CSCs | Inhibited expression of stemness markers (mRNAs and proteins) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUM-149 & SUM-190 | mRNAs: | ||
| SUM-149 | mRNAs: | ||
|
| |||
| A549 & H1299 | mRNAs: | ||
| Proteins: | CD133, CD44, ALDH1A1, Nanog, Oct4, PCNA, CyclinD1, Bcl2, β-Catenin, c-Myc | ||
| Increased | Bax, Caspase8, Cleaved Caspase-3 and -9 | ||
|
| |||
| HCT116-5FUR & SW480-5FUR | mRNAs: | ||
| Proteins: | Notch 1, cleaved-Notch 1, c-Myc, Bmi-1, Suz12, Ezh2 | ||