Literature DB >> 11785681

Bioavailability and bioequivalence: an FDA regulatory overview.

M L Chen1, V Shah, R Patnaik, W Adams, A Hussain, D Conner, M Mehta, H Malinowski, J Lazor, S M Huang, D Hare, L Lesko, D Sporn, R Williams.   

Abstract

Bioavailability and/or bioequivalence studies play a key role in the drug development period for both new drug products and their generic equivalents. For both, these studies are also important in the postapproval period in the presence of certain manufacturing changes. Like many regulatory studies, the assessment of bioavailability and bioequivalence can generally be achieved by considering the following three questions. What is the primary question of the study? What are the tests that can be used to address the question? What degree of confidence is needed for the test outcome? This article reviews the regulatory science of bioavailability and bioequivalence and provides FDA's recommendations for drug sponsors who intend to establish bioavailability and/or demonstrate bioequivalence for their pharmaceutical products during the developmental process or after approval.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11785681     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013319408893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  11 in total

1.  Where are we now and where do we go next in terms of the scientific basis for regulation on bioavailability and bioequivalence? FDA Biopharmaceutics Coordinating Committee.

Authors:  R L Williams; W Adams; M L Chen; D Hare; A Hussain; L Lesko; R Patnaik; V Shah
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  An individual bioequivalence criterion: regulatory considerations.

Authors:  M L Chen; R Patnaik; W W Hauck; D J Schuirmann; T Hyslop; R Williams
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Measures of exposure versus measures of rate and extent of absorption.

Authors:  M L Chen; L Lesko; R L Williams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Evaluation of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs using clinical trial simulations. II: Comparison of single and multiple-dose trials using AUC and Cmax.

Authors:  A A el-Tahtawy; T N Tozer; F Harrison; L Lesko; R Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Absorption rate vs. exposure: which is more useful for bioequivalence testing?

Authors:  T N Tozer; F Y Bois; W W Hauck; M L Chen; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults.

Authors:  P J Sterk; L M Fabbri; P H Quanjer; D W Cockcroft; P M O'Byrne; S D Anderson; E F Juniper; J L Malo
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 16.671

7.  Evaluation of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs using Monte Carlo simulations. I. Estimation of rate of absorption for single and multiple dose trials using Cmax.

Authors:  A A el-Tahtawy; A J Jackson; T M Ludden
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Comparison of single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics using clinical bioequivalence data and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  A A el-Tahtawy; A J Jackson; T M Ludden
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability.

Authors:  G L Amidon; H Lennernäs; V P Shah; J R Crison
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  43 in total

1.  Urinary excretion: does it accurately reflect relative differences in bioavailability/systemic exposure when renal clearance is nonlinear?

Authors:  Gary A Thompson; Roger D Toothaker
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Metabolites and bioequivalence: past and present.

Authors:  Andre J Jackson; Gabriel Robbie; Patrick Marroum
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Biowaivers for oral immediate-release products: implications of linear pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Fried Faassen; Herman Vromans
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin (Provitil powder and Pulmotil liquid AC) oral formulations in chickens.

Authors:  E A Abu-Basha; N M Idkaidek; A F Al-Shunnaq
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 5.  International guidelines for bioequivalence of systemically available orally administered generic drug products: a survey of similarities and differences.

Authors:  Barbara Davit; April C Braddy; Dale P Conner; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Lack of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between generic and branded amoxicillin formulations. A post-marketing clinical study on healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Mario Del Tacca; Giuseppe Pasqualetti; Antonello Di Paolo; Agostino Virdis; Gabriele Massimetti; Giovanni Gori; Daniele Versari; Stefano Taddei; Corrado Blandizzi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  FDA critical path initiatives: opportunities for generic drug development.

Authors:  Robert A Lionberger
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Regulatory Considerations for Approval of Generic Inhalation Drug Products in the US, EU, Brazil, China, and India.

Authors:  Sau L Lee; Bhawana Saluja; Alfredo García-Arieta; Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos; Ying Li; Sarah Lu; Shuguang Hou; Juliet Rebello; Abhijit Vaidya; Jaideep Gogtay; Shrinivas Purandare; Svetlana Lyapustina
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  Requirements for generic antiepileptic medicines: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Eugen Trinka; Günter Krämer; Martin Graf
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Bioactive equivalence of combinatorial components identified in screening of an herbal medicine.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Hua Yang; Fang Long; Hai-Ping Hao; Xiaojun Xu; Ying Liu; Xiao-Wei Shi; Dan-Dan Zhang; Hao-Chuan Zheng; Qian-Ying Wen; Wen-Wen Li; Hui Ji; Xi-Juan Jiang; Bo-Li Zhang; Lian-Wen Qi; Ping Li
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.