| Literature DB >> 32424667 |
Andreas Simgen1, Michael Kettner2, Frida Juliane Webelsiep2, Toshiki Tomori2, Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus2, Umut Yilmaz2, Pervinder Bhogal3, Matthias W Laschke4, Michael D Menger4, Wolfgang Reith2, Philipp Dietrich2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire device has become a standard treatment of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Inadvertent detachment is a feared complication, which is associated with poor clinical outcome. The aim of this experimental study was to assess in a porcine model the feasibility and effectiveness of rescuing detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers.Entities:
Keywords: 3D Revascularization Device; Animal model; EmboTrap II Revascularization Device; Solitaire; Trevo
Year: 2020 PMID: 32424667 PMCID: PMC8211602 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-020-00906-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Neuroradiol ISSN: 1869-1439 Impact factor: 3.649
Fig. 1Illustration of the stent-retriever technique with trapping of the detached Solitaire device. First the detached Solitaire device is passed with the microwire and microcatheter (a). Then the stent retriever is positioned two thirds distal of the detached Solitaire and one third within the Solitaire (b). After that the stent retriever is slowly pulled back until a change in configuration of the Solitaire is noted (c). Subsequently, resheathment of the stent retriever is achieved by gently advancing the microcatheter until a mild resistance is felt at the pusher wire of the stent retriever, indicating that the Solitaire is trapped. Following this and under continuous tension of the pusher wire, the complete Solitaire-retriever complex is pulled inside of the IC (d)
Fig. 2a DSA of the left subclavian artery, axillary arteries and its branches. b Fluoroscopy image of the detached Solitaire FR 6 × 20 mm. The white arrow indicates the proximal marker and the black arrow the 4 distal markers. c Deployment of the 3D Revascularization Device (arrowheads indicate the proximal and distal marker) within the distal two thirds of the Solitaire FR. d Retraction of the 3D Revascularization Device with notable change in configuration of the distal markers of the Solitaire FR (black arrow). e Resheathment of the 3D Revascularization Device by advancing the microcatheter until entrapment of the Solitaire FR (black arrowhead indicates the tip of the microcatheter). f Partial retraction of the 3D Revascularization Device and trapped Solitaire FR within the IC
Overview of results comparing the applied clot retrievers
| Devices | Rescue rate (%) | Time of rescue (s) | Vasospasm | Perforation | Dissection | Entrapment at IC ( | Inadvertent detachment ( | Solitaire migration ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevo ProVue | 100 | 118.85 ± 14.59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EmboTrap II | 100 | 110.14 ± 16.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3D | 100 | 130.29 ± 27.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
IC intermediate catheter
p = 0.316 TREVO ProVue versus EmboTrap
p = 0.350 TREVO ProVue versus 3D Revascularization Device
p = 0.122 EmboTrap versus 3D Revascularization Device
Fig. 3Micro-CT 3D-reconstruction of a rescued Solitaire FR transversal and longitudinal (a and b), revealing a distinct deformation and invagination. The thick arrow indicates one of the trapped distal markers and shows an abnormal bending. The thin arrow indicates the detachment zone presenting as a type A detachment. Scale bar = 1 mm