C Kabbasch1, A Mpotsaris2, T Liebig1, M Söderman3, M Holtmannspötter4, M Cronqvist4, J Thornton5, V Mendes Pereira6, T Andersson3. 1. Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. 2. Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. anastasios.mpotsaris@uk-koeln.de. 3. Department of Neurointervention, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Department of Neuroradiology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, 9, Dublin, Ireland. 6. Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We describe safety and efficacy aspects of mechanical thrombectomy with the novel stent-type clot retrieval device EmboTrap for revascularization of large-artery occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-artery occlusion were treated in five European centers. Clinical and procedural data were collected; self-reported angiographic results and neurologic outcome (discharge and 90 days) were assessed in a standardized manner. RESULTS: The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admittance was 16; no patient was treated after 12 h. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was received by 65 % of patients. The territorial distribution was as follows: 87.5 % in the anterior circulation: 62.5 % middle cerebral artery and 25 % internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus, comprising 20 % tandem occlusions; and 12.5 % in the posterior circulation, all of which were vertebrobasilar. Revascularization of TICI 2b-3 was achieved in 38 of 40 (95 %) treatments. Additional devices were utilized in 11 of 40 (28 %) cases after a mean of 2.6 passes with EmboTrap prior to switching. The mean number of EmboTrap passes needed was 1.8, with a mean procedural time to reperfusion of 54 min. One patient (2.5 %), who had not received IVT, experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage post-interventionally. Procedural complications were encountered in 2 of 40 cases (5 %); both patients exhibited ICA dissection that was treated conservatively without clinical sequelae. There were no device-related complications. Of 23 available patients, 8 (35 %) had a good outcome after 90 days. CONCLUSION: The procedural results from these five centers suggest that EmboTrap is technically safe. Successful recanalization rates can be expected to be within the range of other stent retrievers.
PURPOSE: We describe safety and efficacy aspects of mechanical thrombectomy with the novel stent-type clot retrieval device EmboTrap for revascularization of large-artery occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-artery occlusion were treated in five European centers. Clinical and procedural data were collected; self-reported angiographic results and neurologic outcome (discharge and 90 days) were assessed in a standardized manner. RESULTS: The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admittance was 16; no patient was treated after 12 h. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was received by 65 % of patients. The territorial distribution was as follows: 87.5 % in the anterior circulation: 62.5 % middle cerebral artery and 25 % internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus, comprising 20 % tandem occlusions; and 12.5 % in the posterior circulation, all of which were vertebrobasilar. Revascularization of TICI 2b-3 was achieved in 38 of 40 (95 %) treatments. Additional devices were utilized in 11 of 40 (28 %) cases after a mean of 2.6 passes with EmboTrap prior to switching. The mean number of EmboTrap passes needed was 1.8, with a mean procedural time to reperfusion of 54 min. One patient (2.5 %), who had not received IVT, experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage post-interventionally. Procedural complications were encountered in 2 of 40 cases (5 %); both patients exhibited ICA dissection that was treated conservatively without clinical sequelae. There were no device-related complications. Of 23 available patients, 8 (35 %) had a good outcome after 90 days. CONCLUSION: The procedural results from these five centers suggest that EmboTrap is technically safe. Successful recanalization rates can be expected to be within the range of other stent retrievers.
Authors: Carlos Castaño; Laura Dorado; Cristina Guerrero; Monica Millán; Meritxell Gomis; Natalia Perez de la Ossa; Mar Castellanos; M Rosa García; Sira Domenech; Antoni Dávalos Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Raul G Nogueira; Helmi L Lutsep; Rishi Gupta; Tudor G Jovin; Gregory W Albers; Gary A Walker; David S Liebeskind; Wade S Smith Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-08-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Randall T Higashida; Anthony J Furlan; Heidi Roberts; Thomas Tomsick; Buddy Connors; John Barr; William Dillon; Steven Warach; Joseph Broderick; Barbara Tilley; David Sacks Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Oliver C Singer; Hans-Peter Haring; Johannes Trenkler; Christian H Nolte; Georg Bohner; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin; Erich Hofmann; Arno Reich; Martin Wiesmann; Kurt Niederkorn; Hannes Deutschmann; Matthias Bussmeyer; Anastasios Mpotsaris; Anett Stoll; Albrecht Bormann; Gabor C Petzold; Horst Urbach; Sebastian Jander; Bernd Turowski; Christian Weimar; Marc Schlamann; Klaus Gröschel; Stephan Boor; Joachim Berkefeld Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Osama O Zaidat; Alicia C Castonguay; Rishi Gupta; Chung-Huan J Sun; Coleman Martin; William E Holloway; Nils Mueller-Kronast; Joey D English; Italo Linfante; Guilherme Dabus; Tim W Malisch; Franklin A Marden; Hormozd Bozorgchami; Andrew Xavier; Ansaar T Rai; Michael T Froehler; Aamir Badruddin; Thanh N Nguyen; M Asif Taqi; Michael G Abraham; Vallabh Janardhan; Hashem Shaltoni; Roberta Novakovic; Albert J Yoo; Alex Abou-Chebl; Peng R Chen; Gavin W Britz; Ritesh Kaushal; Ashish Nanda; Mohammad A Issa; Raul G Nogueira Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: S Prothmann; B Friedrich; T Boeckh-Behrens; C Zimmer; J Kaesmacher; K Lucia; C Maegerlein Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Giulia Luraghi; Jose Felix Rodriguez Matas; Gabriele Dubini; Francesca Berti; Sara Bridio; Sharon Duffy; Anushree Dwivedi; Ray McCarthy; Behrooz Fereidoonnezhad; Patrick McGarry; Charles B L M Majoie; Francesco Migliavacca Journal: Interface Focus Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: Andreas Simgen; Michael Kettner; Frida Juliane Webelsiep; Toshiki Tomori; Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus; Umut Yilmaz; Pervinder Bhogal; Matthias W Laschke; Michael D Menger; Wolfgang Reith; Philipp Dietrich Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 3.649