Literature DB >> 33937860

CT-less Direct Correction of Attenuation and Scatter in the Image Space Using Deep Learning for Whole-Body FDG PET: Potential Benefits and Pitfalls.

Jaewon Yang1, Jae Ho Sohn1, Spencer C Behr1, Grant T Gullberg1, Youngho Seo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of CT-less attenuation and scatter correction (ASC) in the image space using deep learning for whole-body PET, with a focus on the potential benefits and pitfalls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 110 whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT studies acquired in 107 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 58 years ± 18; age range, 11-92 years; 72 females) from February 2016 through January 2018 were randomly collected. A total of 37.3% (41 of 110) of the studies showed metastases, with diverse FDG PET findings throughout the whole body. A U-Net-based network was developed for directly transforming noncorrected PET (PETNC) into attenuation- and scatter-corrected PET (PETASC). Deep learning-corrected PET (PETDL) images were quantitatively evaluated by using the standardized uptake value (SUV) of the normalized root mean square error, the peak signal-to-noise ratio, and the structural similarity index, in addition to a joint histogram for statistical analysis. Qualitative reviews by radiologists revealed the potential benefits and pitfalls of this correction method.
RESULTS: The normalized root mean square error (0.21 ± 0.05 [mean SUV ± standard deviation]), mean peak signal-to-noise ratio (36.3 ± 3.0), mean structural similarity index (0.98 ± 0.01), and voxelwise correlation (97.62%) of PETDL demonstrated quantitatively high similarity with PETASC. Radiologist reviews revealed the overall quality of PETDL. The potential benefits of PETDL include a radiation dose reduction on follow-up scans and artifact removal in the regions with attenuation correction- and scatter correction-based artifacts. The pitfalls involve potential false-negative results due to blurring or missing lesions or false-positive results due to pseudo-low-uptake patterns.
CONCLUSION: Deep learning-based direct ASC at whole-body PET is feasible and potentially can be used to overcome the current limitations of CT-based approaches, benefiting patients who are sensitive to radiation from CT.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33937860      PMCID: PMC8043359          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020200137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  27 in total

1.  Structural similarity index family for image quality assessment in radiological images.

Authors:  Gabriel Prieto Renieblas; Agustín Turrero Nogués; Alberto Muñoz González; Nieves Gómez-Leon; Eduardo Guibelalde Del Castillo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-26

2.  PET Image Deblurring and Super-Resolution with an MR-Based Joint Entropy Prior.

Authors:  Tzu-An Song; Fan Yang; Samadrita Roy Chowdhury; Kyungsang Kim; Keith A Johnson; Georges El Fakhri; Quanzheng Li; Joyita Dutta
Journal:  IEEE Trans Comput Imaging       Date:  2019-04-25

Review 3.  Whole-body FDG PET-MR oncologic imaging: pitfalls in clinical interpretation related to inaccurate MR-based attenuation correction.

Authors:  Ulrike Attenberger; Ciprian Catana; Hersh Chandarana; Onofrio A Catalano; Kent Friedman; Stefan A Schonberg; James Thrall; Marco Salvatore; Bruce R Rosen; Alexander R Guimaraes
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-08

4.  A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology.

Authors:  T Beyer; D W Townsend; T Brun; P E Kinahan; M Charron; R Roddy; J Jerin; J Young; L Byars; R Nutt
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  PET/CT in the thorax: pitfalls.

Authors:  Mylene T Truong; Chitra Viswanathan; Brett W Carter; Osama Mawlawi; Edith M Marom
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Independent brain 18F-FDG PET attenuation correction using a deep learning approach with Generative Adversarial Networks.

Authors:  Karim Armanious; Thomas Küstner; Matthias Reimold; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christian La Fougère; Bin Yang; Sergios Gatidis
Journal:  Hell J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 1.102

7.  Synthetic CT generation from non-attenuation corrected PET images for whole-body PET imaging.

Authors:  Xue Dong; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Kristin Higgins; Tian Liu; Walter J Curran; Hui Mao; Jonathon A Nye; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Radiation-related heart disease: current knowledge and future prospects.

Authors:  Sarah C Darby; David J Cutter; Marjan Boerma; Louis S Constine; Luis F Fajardo; Kazunori Kodama; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Lawrence B Marks; Fred A Mettler; Lori J Pierce; Klaus R Trott; Edward T H Yeh; Roy E Shore
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the novel hypoxia PET probe [18F]DiFA and comparison with [18F]FMISO.

Authors:  Shiro Watanabe; Tohru Shiga; Kenji Hirata; Keiichi Magota; Shozo Okamoto; Takuya Toyonaga; Kei Higashikawa; Hironobu Yasui; Jun Kobayashi; Ken-Ichi Nishijima; Ken Iseki; Hiroki Matsumoto; Yuji Kuge; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A review on AI in PET imaging.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsubara; Masanobu Ibaraki; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yuichi Kimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Investigating the limited performance of a deep-learning-based SPECT denoising approach: An observer-study-based characterization.

Authors:  Zitong Yu; Md Ashequr Rahman; Abhinav K Jha
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 3.  Advances in Preclinical PET.

Authors:  Stephen S Adler; Jurgen Seidel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.802

Review 4.  A role for artificial intelligence in molecular imaging of infection and inflammation.

Authors:  Johannes Schwenck; Manfred Kneilling; Niels P Riksen; Christian la Fougère; Douwe J Mulder; Riemer J H A Slart; Erik H J G Aarntzen
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  Lutetium background radiation in total-body PET-A simulation study on opportunities and challenges in PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Negar Omidvari; Li Cheng; Edwin K Leung; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Ramsey D Badawi; Tianyu Ma; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Front Nucl Med       Date:  2022-08-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.