Literature DB >> 33811600

Deep learning-based attenuation correction for brain PET with various radiotracers.

Fumio Hashimoto1, Masanori Ito2, Kibo Ote3, Takashi Isobe3, Hiroyuki Okada4,5, Yasuomi Ouchi6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Attenuation correction (AC) is crucial for ensuring the quantitative accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, obtaining accurate μ-maps from brain-dedicated PET scanners without AC acquisition mechanism is challenging. Therefore, to overcome these problems, we developed a deep learning-based PET AC (deep AC) framework to synthesize transmission computed tomography (TCT) images from non-AC (NAC) PET images using a convolutional neural network (CNN) with a huge dataset of various radiotracers for brain PET imaging.
METHODS: The proposed framework is comprised of three steps: (1) NAC PET image generation, (2) synthetic TCT generation using CNN, and (3) PET image reconstruction. We trained the CNN by combining the mixed image dataset of six radiotracers to avoid overfitting, including [18F]FDG, [18F]BCPP-EF, [11C]Racropride, [11C]PIB, [11C]DPA-713, and [11C]PBB3. We used 1261 brain NAC PET and TCT images (1091 for training and 70 for testing). We did not include [11C]Methionine subjects in the training dataset, but included them in the testing dataset.
RESULTS: The image quality of the synthetic TCT images obtained using the CNN trained on the mixed dataset of six radiotracers was superior to those obtained using the CNN trained on the split dataset generated from each radiotracer. In the [18F]FDG study, the mean relative PET biases of the emission-segmented AC (ESAC) and deep AC were 8.46 ± 5.24 and - 5.69 ± 4.97, respectively. The deep AC PET and TCT AC PET images exhibited excellent correlation for all seven radiotracers (R2 = 0.912-0.982).
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that our proposed deep AC framework can be leveraged to provide quantitatively superior PET images when using the CNN trained on the mixed dataset of PET tracers than when using the CNN trained on the split dataset which means specific for each tracer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation correction; Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Positron emission tomography (PET)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33811600     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01611-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  6 in total

Review 1.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Bruce Hasegawa
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body 18F-FDG PET using a deep residual network.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Hossein Arabi; Parham Geramifar; Ghasem Hajianfar; Pardis Ghafarian; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Independent brain 18F-FDG PET attenuation correction using a deep learning approach with Generative Adversarial Networks.

Authors:  Karim Armanious; Thomas Küstner; Matthias Reimold; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christian La Fougère; Bin Yang; Sergios Gatidis
Journal:  Hell J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 1.102

4.  PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Medhat Osman; Christian Cohade; Laura T Marshall; Jonathan M Links; Steve Kohlmyer; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Independent attenuation correction of whole body [18F]FDG-PET using a deep learning approach with Generative Adversarial Networks.

Authors:  Karim Armanious; Tobias Hepp; Thomas Küstner; Helmut Dittmann; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christian La Fougère; Bin Yang; Sergios Gatidis
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.138

6.  A deep learning approach for 18F-FDG PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Hyungseok Jang; Richard Kijowski; Gengyan Zhao; Tyler Bradshaw; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2018-11-12
  6 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A review on AI in PET imaging.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsubara; Masanobu Ibaraki; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yuichi Kimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 2.  Application of artificial intelligence in brain molecular imaging.

Authors:  Satoshi Minoshima; Donna Cross
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.