| Literature DB >> 32409737 |
Muhammad Taha1, Fazal Rahim2, Aftab Ahmad Khan2, El Hassane Anouar3, Naveed Ahmed4, Syed Adnan Ali Shah5,6, Mohamed Ibrahim7, Zainul Amiruddin Zakari8,9.
Abstract
The current study describes synthesis of diindolylmethane (DIM) derivatives based-thiadiazole as a new class of urease inhibitors. Diindolylmethane is natural product alkaloid reported to use in medicinal chemistry extensively. Diindolylmethane-based-thiadiazole analogs (1-18) were synthesized and characterized by various spectroscopic techniques 1HNMR, 13C-NMR, EI-MS and evaluated for urease (jack bean urease) inhibitory potential. All compounds showed excellent to moderate inhibitory potential having IC50 value within the range of 0.50 ± 0.01 to 33.20 ± 1.20 µM compared with the standard thiourea (21.60 ± 0.70 µM). Compound 8 (IC50 = 0.50 ± 0.01 µM) was the most potent inhibitor amongst all derivatives. Structure-activity relationships have been established for all compounds. The key binding interactions of most active compounds with enzyme were confirmed through molecular docking studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32409737 PMCID: PMC7224224 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64729-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Rationalization of the newly synthesized diindolylmethane-based-thiadiazole analogs with already reported thiadiazole analogs.
Different diindolylmethane-based-thiadiazole analogs and their urease activity (1–18).
| S.No. | R | IC50 ± SEMa | S.No. | R | IC50 ± SEMa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.20 ± 0.30 | 1.6 ± 0.01 | ||||
| 1.80 ± 0.01 | 33.20 ± 1.20 | ||||
| 1.10 ± 0.01 | 8.50 ± 0.30 | ||||
| 2.20 ± 0.10 | 5.10 ± 0.10 | ||||
| 7.30 ± 0.10 | 19.80 ± 0.80 | ||||
| 0.70 ± 0.01 | 3.90 ± 0.10 | ||||
| 2.30 ± 0.10 | 23.80 ± 1.00 | ||||
| 0.50 ± 0.01 | 28.60 ± 1.20 | ||||
| 1.10 ± 0.01 | 20.40 ± 1.20 | ||||
IC50, docking binding energies, hydrogen bonding and the number of closest residues to the docked ligands in the active site of the diindolylmethane bearing thiadiazol derivatives 1–18 into the active binding site of urease.
| No. of Compound | Free binding energy (kcal/mol) | H-Bonds | Number of closest residues to the docked ligand in the active site | IC50 ± SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −8.19 | 4 | 9 | 1.80 ± 0.01 | |
| −8.70 | 4 | 12 | 1.10 ± 0.01 | |
| −8.72 | 2 | 10 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | |
| −9.64 | 4 | 12 | 2.20 ± 0.10 | |
| −10.18 | 3 | 13 | 7.30 ± 0.10 | |
| −9.87 | 3 | 13 | 3.90 ± 0.10 | |
| −10.00 | 2 | 12 | 8.50 ± 0.30 | |
| −9.74 | 4 | 12 | 5.10 ± 0.10 | |
| −9.12 | 2 | 12 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | |
| −9.01 | 0 | 13 | 2.30 ± 0.10 | |
| −9.45 | 3 | 11 | 1.6 ± 0.01 | |
| −8.70 | 3 | 11 | 13.20 ± 0.30 | |
| −10.55 | 2 | 14 | 33.20 ± 1.20 | |
| −9.48 | 2 | 13 | 23.80 ± 1.00 | |
| −10.13 | 3 | 12 | 28.60 ± 1.20 | |
| −9.74 | 3 | 11 | 20.40 ± 1.20 |
Figure 23D (right) and 2D (left) closest interactions between active site residues of urease and selected compounds 2, 3, and 8.
Figure 33D (right) and 2D (left) closest interactions between active site residues of urease and compounds 16 and 11.