| Literature DB >> 32398084 |
Dexin Wang1,2, Hyangmi Kim3, Sungbeom Lee4,5, Dae-Hyuk Kim2, Min-Ho Joe6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) is a promising biopolymer and has been applied in many fields. Bacillus siamensis SB1001 was a newly isolated poly-γ-glutamic acid producer with sucrose as its optimal carbon source. To improve the utilization of carbon source, and then molasses can be effectively used for γ-PGA production, 60cobalt gamma rays was used to mutate the genes of B. siamensis SB1001.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus siamensis IR10; Fermentation; Gamma irradiation; Poly-γ-glutamic acid; Untreated molasses
Year: 2020 PMID: 32398084 PMCID: PMC7216703 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-020-01361-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
γ-PGA production by B. siamensis SB1001 mutant strains
| Strains | 12 h | 18 h | 24 h | Residual | Conversion rate g(γ-PGA)/g( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g/L) | γ-PGA (g/L) | Biomass (g/L) | γ-PGA (g/L) | Biomass (g/L) | γ-PGA (g/L) | |||
| SB1001 | 2.31 ± 0.06 | 1.37 ± 0.03 | 3.76 ± 0.11 | 2.1 ± 0.05 | 4.49 ± 0.20 | 2.77 ± 0.07 | 16.17 ± 0.56 | 0.21 |
| IR5 | 3.93 ± 0.11 | 3.77 ± 0.07 | 4.02 ± 0.18 | 5.30 ± 0.22 | 3.78 ± 0.10 | 6.62 ± 0.25 | 14.41 ± 0.62 | 0.42 |
| IR7 | 4.06 ± 0.18 | 5.50 ± 0.23 | 4.18 ± 0.18 | 6.03 ± 0.24 | 4.51 ± 0.18 | 5.99 ± 0.24 | 15.66 ± 0.55 | 0.42 |
| IR8 | 4.30 ± 0.15 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 4.56 ± 0.16 | 1.04 ± 0.01 | 5.34 ± 0.22 | 1.63 ± 0.01 | 18.88 ± 0.67 | 0.15 |
| IR9 | 5.13 ± 0.20 | 0.79 ± 0.01 | 5.19 ± 0.20 | 1.60 ± 0.03 | 6.08 ± 0.24 | 2.18 ± 0.05 | 14.23 ± 0.52 | 0.14 |
| IR10 | 3.96 ± 0.12 | 5.60 ± 0.23 | 4.42 ± 0.18 | 6.86 ± 0.31 | 4.82 ± 0.21 | 7.74 ± 0.35 | 12.32 ± 0.48 | 0.44 |
| IR12 | 3.89 ± 0.12 | 1.67 ± 0.03 | 5.06 ± 0.23 | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 6.24 ± 0.25 | 1.97 ± 0.02 | 13.25 ± 0.46 | 0.12 |
| IR14 | 4.28 ± 0.16 | 5.51 ± 0.23 | 4.42 ± 0.15 | 5.69 ± 0.24 | 5.08 ± 0.19 | 5.79 ± 0.22 | 13.66 ± 0.51 | 0.35 |
Effect of carbon sources on γ-PGA production by B. siamensis SB1001 and mutant strain IR10
| Carbon source | 12 h | 24 h | Biomass ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g/L) | γ-PGA (g/L) | Biomass (g/L) | γ-PGA (g/L) | |||||||
| SB1001 | IR10 | SB1001 | IR10 | SB1001 | IR10 | SB1001 | IR10 | SB1001 | IR10 | |
| Glucose | 2.31 ± 0.08 | 3.96 ± 0.12 | 1.37 ± 0.05 | 5.60 ± 0.23 | 4.49 ± 0.18 | 4.82 ± 0.21 | 2.77 ± 0.11 | 7.74 ± 0.35 | 1.76 × 10−6 | 2.44 × 10−6 |
| Fructose | 2.69 ± 0.07 | 4.25 ± 0.13 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 4.99 ± 0.18 | 4.56 ± 0.17 | 4.86 ± 0.21 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 7.21 ± 0.26 | 1.32 × 10−6 | 2.36 × 10−6 |
| Sucrose | 2.52 ± 0.08 | 4.71 ± 0.13 | 5.24 ± 0.23 | 5.70 ± 0.21 | 4.07 ± 0.14 | 6.22 ± 0.28 | 7.06 ± 0.26 | 7.14 ± 0.25 | 9.59 × 10−7 | 2.77 × 10−6 |
| Glycerol | 1.52 ± 0.05 | 2.99 ± 0.09 | 1.95 ± 0.06 | 3.23 ± 0.12 | 3.33 ± 0.14 | 6.67 ± 0.26 | 3.82 ± 0.15 | 6.81 ± 0.22 | 2.15 × 10−6 | 1.56 × 10−6 |
| Maltose | 2.58 ± 0.08 | 4.08 ± 0.11 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 3.32 ± 0.11 | 4.36 ± 0.16 | 5.97 ± 0.23 | 0.55 ± 0.03 | 6.98 ± 0.22 | 1.24 × 10−6 | 1.49 × 10−6 |
| Mannose | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 4.18 ± 0.12 | 0 | 4.09 ± 0.15 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 4.80 ± 0.21 | 0 | 7.11 ± 0.24 | 1 | 2.48 × 10−6 |
| Xylose | 1.35 ± 0.05 | 2.47 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 1.73 ± 0.05 | 4.36 ± 0.18 | 5.88 ± 0.22 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 6.22 ± 0.18 | 1.98 × 10−6 | 1.33 × 10−6 |
| Lactose | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 4.46 ± 0.14 | 0 | 3.79 ± 0.14 | 1.38 ± 0.03 | 5.79 ± 0.20 | 0 | 7.09 ± 0.25 | 1.95 × 10−7 | 9.65 × 10−7 |
| Galactose | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 1.27 ± 0.13 | 0 | 0 | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 3.09 ± 0.15 | 0 | 0.72 ± 0.03 | 2.88 × 10−6 | 3.81 × 10−6 |
Initial biomass (0 h) 0.02 g/L; Statistical analysis was performed for the biomass at 0 h and 24 h. P-values < 0.05 showed the significant differences
Fig. 1Effect of the molasses concentration for γ-PGA production by B. siamensis IR10
Fig. 2Comparison between B. siamensis SB1001 and mutant strain IR10 for γ-PGA production using molasses in the fermentor
Fig. 3Fed-batch fermentation of γ-PGA using untreated molasses in the fermentor by B. siamensis IR10
Fig. 4Repeated fed-batch fermentation of γ-PGA using untreated molasses in the fermentor by B. siamensis IR10
Comparison of parameters of each cycle for γ-PGA production by B. siamensis IR10 in repeated fed-batch fermentation
| Cycle number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | 24 | 24 | 24 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Biomass (g/L) | 14.88 ± 0.49 | 15.88 ± 0.52 | 16.73 ± 0.55 | 16.77 ± 0.56 | 17.08 ± 0.57 | 17.09 ± 0.56 |
| γ-PGA concentration (g/L) | 40.06 ± 1.33 | 44.77 ± 1.39 | 45.42 ± 1.41 | 44.10 ± 1.23 | 44.90 ± 1.26 | 44.98 ± 1.26 |
| γ-PGA productivity (g/L/h) | 1.67 ± 0.05 | 1.70 ± 0.06 | 1.71 ± 0.06 | 1.98 ± 0.06 | 2.02 ± 0.06 | 2.02 ± 0.06 |
The productivity was calculated according to the produced γ-PGA production as follows
Cycle 1: 40.06 ÷ 24 = 1.67; Cycle 2: (44.77 − 4.00) ÷ 24 = 1.70; Cycle 3: (45.42 − 4.40) ÷ 24 = 1.71; Cycle 4: (44.10 − 4.54) ÷ 20 = 1.98
Cycle 5: (44.90 − 4.53) ÷ 20 = 2.02; Cycle 6: (44.98 − 4.53) ÷ 20 = 2.02
Comparison of γ-PGA production and productivity in the fermentor
| Strain | Key nutrients | Fermentation process | Production (g/L) | Productivity (g/L/h) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Membrane-integrated hybrid reactor system (30 L), continuous feed fermentation | 36.5 | 0.91 | [ | ||
| Sodium glutamate, glucose, sodium citrate,(NH4)2SO4 | Fed-batch fermentation (7 L) | 41.6 | 1.07 | [ | |
| Glutamate, glucose, (NH4)2SO4 | Aerobic plant fibrous-bed bioreactor (7.5 L), repeated fed-batch fermentation | 71.21 | 1.246 | [ | |
| Glutamic acid, citric acid, glycerol, NH4Cl | Bioreactor (5 L) with oxygen carrier, batch fermentation | 23.5 | 0.98 | [ | |
| Glutamate, glucose, (NH4)2SO4 | Moving bed biofilm reactor (7.5 L), repeated fed-batch fermentation | 74.2 | 1.24 | [ | |
| Fed-batch and repeated fed-batch fermentation (3 L) | 41.4–45.42 | 1.67–2.02 | This work |
Fig. 5Enzyme activities in ● B. siamensis SB1001 and ■ B. siamensis IR10 with a sucrose, b glucose, c fructose and d molasses as the carbon source