| Literature DB >> 32397090 |
Claudia Zani1, Elisabetta Ceretti1, Ilaria Zerbini1, Gaia Claudia Viviana Viola1, Francesco Donato1, Umberto Gelatti1, Donatella Feretti1.
Abstract
Air pollution is a well-known problem for human health, especially for children living in highly polluted urban areas. This study aimed to assess the relationship between airborne pollutants concentration and biomarkers of DNA damage in the buccal mucosa cells of pre-school children. DNA damage was investigated with comet test in saliva leukocytes taken from sputum of 3- to 6-year-old children living in Brescia, Northern Italy, collected during two consecutive winter seasons (2012-2013). The daily levels of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, CO, SO2, benzene and O3 in urban air were collected for the whole period. A questionnaire filled in by the children's parents was used to evaluate indoor and outdoor exposure. DNA damage in saliva leukocytes was evaluated in 152 children and the means of tail intensity and visual score as DNA damage were 6.2 ± 4.3 and 182.1 ± 30.9, respectively. No demographic and indoor or outdoor exposure variable was associated with the two measures of DNA damage. No significant association between air pollution and DNA damage in children's buccal leukocytes was found. In this study, the comet assay does not appear to be a valuable biomarker to detect DNA damage in children exposed to high levels of air pollutants, such as PM10, PM2.5 and NO2.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage; children; comet assay; early biological effects; mucosa buccal cells; saliva leukocytes; urban air pollution
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397090 PMCID: PMC7246791 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Comet test results expressed as visual score and tail intensity according to demographic and indoor and outdoor environmental exposure variables.
| Demographic and Indoor and Outdoor Environmental Exposure Variables | N (%) | Visual Score | Tail Intensity % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | ||
| Sex | |||||
| M | 85 (55.9) | 180.4 ± 30.8 | 179.0 | 6.1 ± 4.6 | 5.8 |
| F | 67 (44.1) | 184.2 ± 31.2 | 187.5 | 6.4 ± 3.9 | 7.0 |
| Children’s age | |||||
| 3 years | 26 (17.1) | 190.8 ± 30.1 | 196.2 | 7.1 ± 3.8 | 7.5 |
| 4 years | 52 (34.2) | 177.7 ± 33.1 | 171.8 | 5.5 ± 4.6 | 4.4 |
| 5–6 years | 74 (48.7) | 182.1 ± 29.4 | 184.3 | 6.3 ± 4.2 | 6.8 |
| Parents’ education (at least one parent) | |||||
| Primary school or less | 16 (10.5) | 175.3 ± 28.9 | 175.4 | 5.3 ± 3.7 | 4.5 |
| Secondary school | 47 (30.9) | 184.8 ± 29.1 | 187.3 | 6.8 ± 4.2 | 7.4 |
| College or university | 89 (58.6) | 181.9 ± 32.3 | 179.0 | 6.0 ± 4.4 | 5.4 |
| Home characteristics | |||||
|
| |||||
| Heavy | 86 (56.6) | 181.4 ± 29.3 | 182.5 | 6.0 ± 4.0 | 6.5 |
| Moderate | 49 (32.2) | 185.7 ± 33.4 | 180.0 | 6.8 ± 4.8 | 7.2 |
| Very light | 17 (11.2) | 175.2 ± 32.0 | 168.4 | 5.4 ± 4.4 | 4.1 |
|
| |||||
| Heavy | 27 (18.0) | 171.6 ± 26.5 | 164.0 | 4.7 ± 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Moderate | 59 (39.3) | 180.6 ± 27.6 | 181.5 | 5.9 ± 4.1 | 6.3 |
| Very light | 64 (42.7) | 188.9 ± 34.2 | 190.9 | 7.2 ± 4.6 | 7.7 |
|
| |||||
| Gas stove in home | 7 (4.6) | 172.9 ± 18.9 | 169.0 | 4.6 ± 2.8 | 4.6 |
| Fireplace in home | 34 (22.4) | 177.6 ± 31.8 | 179.5 | 5.6 ± 4.0 | 5.2 |
| Presence of smokers in home | 24 (15.8) | 179.2 ± 31.4 | 173.7 | 5.3 ± 4.5 | 3.7 |
| School characteristics | |||||
|
| |||||
| Heavy | 87 (58.0) | 178.0 ± 29.1 | 175.1 | 5.6 ± 3.9 | 5.3 |
| Moderate | 54 (36.0) | 187.0 ± 33.0 | 185.3 | 7.0 ± 4.8 | 7.2 |
| Very light | 9 (6.0) | 188.4 ± 35.4 | 198.0 | 6.7 ± 4.4 | 8.7 |
|
| |||||
| Heavy | 26 (17.4) | 175.4 ± 28.7 | 169.7 | 4.9 ± 3.7 | 4.1 |
| Moderate | 64 (43.0) | 181.1 ± 28.7 | 183.7 | 6.1 ± 4.0 | 6.5 |
| Very light | 59 (39.6) | 186.4 ± 34.3 | 185.5 | 6.8 ± 4.7 | 7.4 |
| Child’s habits | |||||
|
| |||||
| Less than 1 h | 66 (44.0) | 181.0 ± 31.3 | 179.2 | 6.2 ± 4.4 | 6.1 |
| More than 1 h but less than 3 h | 57 (38.0) | 182.9 ± 28.9 | 187.3 | 6.3 ± 4.3 | 6.6 |
| 3 h or more | 27 (18.0) | 184.4 ± 35.4 | 185.1 | 6.4 ± 4.2 | 7.3 |
|
| |||||
| Never | 19 (12.7) | 182.1 ± 30.1 | 181.5 | 5.8 ± 4.1 | 5.3 |
| Sometimes | 97 (64.6) | 180.1 ± 29.5 | 180.0 | 5.9 ± 4.1 | 6.0 |
| Often/always | 34 (22.7) | 186.7 ± 35.9 | 179.2 | 7.0 ± 5.1 | 6.5 |
| Parents’ smoking habits | |||||
| Neither parent smokers | 97 (64.2) | 183.9 ± 32.5 | 186.0 | 6.5 ± 4.4 | 7.0 |
| Mother smoked during pregnancy | 32 (21.0) | 185.3 ± 23.7 | 187.4 | 6.3 ± 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Mother smoker | 27 (17.8) | 178.0 ± 23.3 | 179.5 | 5.2 ± 3.4 | 4.8 |
| Father smoker | 43 (28.3) | 177.7 ± 28.5 | 173.2 | 5.5 ± 4.1 | 4.6 |
| Both parents smokers | 38 (25.2) | 178.6 ± 22.1 | 179.2 | 5.4 ± 3.4 | 4.7 |
Coefficients of linear regressions of the DNA damage expressed as visual score on the concentration of air pollution at 1, 2 days and 1 week preceding biological sampling computed for units of increase for each pollutant.
| Pollutant Levels in Days before Sampling | Coefficient | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PM10 1 day | 0.035 | −0.112; 0.183 | 0.63 |
| PM10 2 days | 0.008 | −0.179; 0.195 | 0.93 |
| PM10 7 days | 0.085 | −0.171; 0.341 | 0.51 |
| PM2.5 1 day | −0.036 | −0.211; 0.138 | 0.67 |
| PM2.5 2 days | −0.053 | −0.262; 0.155 | 0.61 |
| PM2.5 7 days | 0.176 | −0.166; 0.518 | 0.31 |
| Benzene 1 day | −3.96 | −8.947; 1.015 | 0.11 |
| Benzene 2 days | −3.89 | −9.018; 1.223 | 0.13 |
| Benzene 7 days | −1.01 | −7.336; 5.310 | 0.72 |
| NO2 1 day | −0.096 | −0.449; 0.257 | 0.59 |
| NO2 2 days | −0.171 | −0.639; 0.297 | 0.47 |
| NO2 7 days | 0.246 | −0.304; 0.797 | 0.37 |
| SO2 1 day | −1.57 | −3.095; −0.045 | 0.04 |
| SO2 2 days | −0.53 | −2.487; 1.418 | 0.58 |
| SO2 7 days | 0.61 | −1.460; 2.684 | 0.58 |
| O3 1 day | 0.27 | −0.134; 0.690 | 0.18 |
| O3 2 days | 0.51 | 0.001; 1.019 | 0.05 |
| O3 7 days | 0.63 | −0.215; 1.491 | 0.14 |
Figure 1Scatterplots and the linear regression of the visual score by ozone concentration at 1, 2 and 7 days before biological sampling.