Literature DB >> 17118697

Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup.

Brian Burlinson1, Raymond R Tice, Günter Speit, Eva Agurell, Susanne Y Brendler-Schwaab, Andrew R Collins, Patricia Escobar, Masamitsu Honma, Tirukalikundram S Kumaravel, Madoka Nakajima, Yu F Sasaki, Veronique Thybaud, Yoshifumi Uno, Marie Vasquez, Andreas Hartmann.   

Abstract

As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9-10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH >13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the "Gold Standard". As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118697     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  70 in total

1.  Neonatal handling impairs spatial memory and leads to altered nitric oxide production and DNA breaks in a sex specific manner.

Authors:  Cristie Grazziotin Noschang; Rachel Krolow; Fernanda Urruth Fontella; Danusa M Arcego; Luísa Amália Diehl; Simone Nardin Weis; Nice S Arteni; Carla Dalmaz
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 2.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  DNA damage phenotype and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  O Kosti; L Goldman; D T Saha; R A Orden; A J Pollock; H L Madej; A W Hsing; L W Chu; J H Lynch; R Goldman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Tissue-specific differences in the accumulation of sequence rearrangements with age.

Authors:  Dominika M Wiktor-Brown; Werner Olipitz; Carrie A Hendricks; Rebecca E Rugo; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-03-20

5.  Nonclinical safety assessment of PF614: A novel TAAP prodrug of oxycodone for chronic pain indication.

Authors:  P S Joshi; N Sanakkayala; L Kirkpatrick; P S Terse
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  No increases in biomarkers of genetic damage or pathological changes in heart and brain tissues in male rats administered methylphenidate hydrochloride (Ritalin) for 28 days.

Authors:  Kristine L Witt; David E Malarkey; Cheryl A Hobbs; Jeffrey P Davis; Grace E Kissling; William Caspary; Gregory Travlos; Leslie Recio
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Prevention of oxidative DNA damage in inner organs and lymphocytes of rats by green tea extract.

Authors:  Nina Kager; Franziska Ferk; Michael Kundi; Karl-Heinz Wagner; Miroslav Misík; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Comparison of three oxidative stress biomarkers in a sample of healthy adults.

Authors:  Joanne L Watters; Jessie A Satia; Kerry-Ann da Costa; Gunnar Boysen; Leonard B Collins; Jason D Morrow; Ginger L Milne; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  An ECVAG trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay.

Authors:  Clara Johansson; Peter Møller; Lykke Forchhammer; Steffen Loft; Roger W L Godschalk; Sabine A S Langie; Stijn Lumeij; George D D Jones; Rachel W L Kwok; Amaya Azqueta; David H Phillips; Osman Sozeri; Michael N Routledge; Alexander J Charlton; Patrizia Riso; Marisa Porrini; Alessandra Allione; Giuseppe Matullo; Jadwiga Palus; Maciej Stepnik; Andrew R Collins; Lennart Möller
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Combining the in vivo comet and micronucleus assays: a practical approach to genotoxicity testing and data interpretation.

Authors:  Marie Z Vasquez
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.