Literature DB >> 18283046

The comet assay: topical issues.

Andrew R Collins1, Amaia Azqueta Oscoz, Gunnar Brunborg, Isabel Gaivão, Lisa Giovannelli, Marcin Kruszewski, Catherine C Smith, Rudolf Stetina.   

Abstract

The comet assay is a versatile and sensitive method for measuring single- and double-strand breaks in DNA. The mechanism of formation of comets (under neutral or alkaline conditions) is best understood by analogy with nucleoids, in which relaxation of DNA supercoiling in a structural loop of DNA by a single DNA break releases that loop to extend into a halo-or, in the case of the comet assay, to be pulled towards the anode under the electrophoretic field. A consideration of the simple physics underlying electrophoresis leads to a better understanding of the assay. The sensitivity of the assay is only fully appreciated when it is calibrated: between one hundred and several thousand breaks per cell can be determined. By including lesion-specific enzymes in the assay, its range and sensitivity are greatly increased, but it is important to bear in mind that their specificity is not absolute. Different approaches to quantitation of the comet assay are discussed. Arguments are presented against trying to apply the comet assay to the study of apoptosis. Finally, some of the advantages and disadvantages of using the comet assay on lymphocyte samples collected in human studies are rehearsed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18283046     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gem051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  143 in total

1.  Comparison of four methods to evaluate sperm DNA integrity between mouse caput and cauda epididymidis.

Authors:  Serafín Pérez-Cerezales; Alberto Miranda; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Clinically relevant doses of chemotherapy agents reversibly block formation of glioblastoma neurospheres.

Authors:  Alicia M Mihaliak; Candace A Gilbert; Li Li; Marie-Claire Daou; Richard P Moser; Andrew Reeves; Brent H Cochran; Alonzo H Ross
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 3.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Chlorpyrifos levels within permitted limits induce nuclear abnormalities and DNA damage in the erythrocytes of the common carp.

Authors:  Vesela Mitkovska; Tsenka Chassovnikarova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Effects of combined physical exercise training on DNA damage and repair capacity: role of oxidative stress changes.

Authors:  Jorge Pinto Soares; Amélia M Silva; Maria Manuel Oliveira; Francisco Peixoto; Isabel Gaivão; Maria Paula Mota
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-05

6.  Comparison of three oxidative stress biomarkers in a sample of healthy adults.

Authors:  Joanne L Watters; Jessie A Satia; Kerry-Ann da Costa; Gunnar Boysen; Leonard B Collins; Jason D Morrow; Ginger L Milne; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Mastoparan-induced programmed cell death in the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Zhenya P Yordanova; Ernst J Woltering; Veneta M Kapchina-Toteva; Elena T Iakimova
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Markers of oxidant stress that are clinically relevant in aging and age-related disease.

Authors:  Kimberly D Jacob; Nicole Noren Hooten; Andrzej R Trzeciak; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 9.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Assessment of DNA damage and repair in adults consuming allyl isothiocyanate or Brassica vegetables.

Authors:  Craig S Charron; Beverly A Clevidence; George A Albaugh; Matthew H Kramer; Bryan T Vinyard; John A Milner; Janet A Novotny
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.