Literature DB >> 34740015

Optimal surgical component alignment minimizes TKR wear - An in silico study with nine alignment parameters.

Steven P Mell1, Markus A Wimmer2, Joshua J Jacobs2, Hannah J Lundberg2.   

Abstract

Currently, preclinical mechanical wear testing of total knee replacements (TKRs) is done using ideally aligned components using standardized TKR level walking under either force or displacement-control regimes. To understand the influence of implant alignment and testing control regime, we studied the effect of nine component alignment parameters on TKR volumetric wear in silico. We used a computational framework combining Latin Hypercube sampling design of experiments, finite element analysis, and a numerical model of polyethylene wear, to create a predictive model of how component alignment affects wear rate for each control regime. Nine component alignment parameters were investigated, five femoral variables and four tibial variables. To investigate perturbations of the nine implant alignment variables, two separate 300-point designs were executed, one for each control regime. The results were then used to generate surrogate statistical models using stepwise multiple linear regression. Wear at the neutral position was 4.5mm3/million cycle and 8.6mm3/million cycle for displacement and force-control, respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression surrogate models were highly significant for each control regime, but force-control generated a stronger predictive model, with a higher R2, more included terms, and a lower RMSE. Both models predicted transverse plane rotational mismatch can lead to large changes in predicted wear; a transverse plane alignment mismatch of 15° can elicit a change in wear of up to 5mm3/million cycle, almost double that of neutral alignment. Therefore, transverse plane alignment is particularly important when considering failure of the implant due to wear.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Surgical alignment; Total knee replacement; Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE); Wear

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34740015      PMCID: PMC8710043          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  52 in total

1.  Constitutive modeling of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene under large-deformation and cyclic loading conditions.

Authors:  J S Bergström; S M Kurtz; C M Rimnac; A A Edidin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique.

Authors:  Pak Lin Chin; Kuang Ying Yang; Seng Jin Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Experimental testing of total knee replacements with UHMW-PE inserts: impact of severe wear test conditions.

Authors:  Carmen Zietz; Joern Reinders; Jens Schwiesau; Alexander Paulus; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Thomas Grupp; Sandra Utzschneider; Rainer Bader
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Polyethylene damage and knee kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M K Harman; S A Banks; W A Hodge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3.

Authors:  Steven P Mell; Markus A Wimmer; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Arthroplasty in young adults: options, techniques, trends, and results.

Authors:  Bharat S Mody; Kshitij Mody
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

7.  A probabilistic finite element analysis of the stresses in the augmented vertebral body after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Hadi Nabil Boustani; Georg Bergmann; Thomas Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement.

Authors:  D Nicoll; D I Rowley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

Review 9.  Tibial internal rotation negatively affects clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Francesco Ascione; Marco Rossini; Adriano Braile; Katia Corona; Michele Vasso; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.