Literature DB >> 32410286

Backside wear of tibial polyethylene components is affected by gait pattern: A knee simulator study using rare earth tracer technology.

Valentina Ngai1, Joachim Kunze1,2, Johannes Cip3, Michel P Laurent1, Joshua J Jacobs1, Markus A Wimmer1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of two in-vivo-determined gait patterns, one with low and one with high anteroposterior (AP) motion, on total and backside polyethylene insert wear in comparison with the ISO (International Organization for Standardization) standard 14243-3. In order to differentiate and accurately quantify topside and backside wear, a novel technique was employed where different lanthanide tracers were incorporated into the polyethylene during manufacture. Wear particle analysis was conducted following established protocols. For all tested liners and motion protocols, the chemically calculated wear rates correlated closely with gravimetrically determined wear. Both in vivo motion groups displayed higher wear rates than the ISO group following the order of the AP motion amplitudes. Backside wear for ISO constituted 2.76% ± 0.90% (mean ± SE) of the total wear, increasing significantly to 15.8% ± 3.2% for the low AP and further increasing to 19.3% ± 0.95% for the high AP motion protocol. The mean wear particle sizes were under 200 nm for all three motion patterns, being largest for the protocol with high AP motion. Particle release from the low and high AP gait patterns was 1.9 to 2.8 times that from the ISO protocol. Testing for the proportion of backside wear across various activities of daily living should be an important consideration in evaluating knee prostheses wear.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backside wear; gait; polyethylene; rare earth; total knee prosthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32410286      PMCID: PMC7329356          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of wear in a total knee replacement under different kinematic conditions.

Authors:  P I Barnett; J Fisher; D D Auger; M H Stone; E Ingham
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Factors affecting the severity of backside wear of modular tibial inserts.

Authors:  Michael A Conditt; Jason A Stein; Philip C Noble
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns.

Authors:  John Fisher; Hannah M J McEwen; Joanne L Tipper; Alison L Galvin; Jo Ingram; Amir Kamali; Martin H Stone; Eileen Ingham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Clinical performance of contemporary tibial polyethylene components.

Authors:  Roy D Crowninshield; Markus A Wimmer; Joshua J Jacobs; Aaron G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Activity level and wear in total knee arthroplasty: a study of autopsy retrieved specimens.

Authors:  C J Lavernia; R J Sierra; D S Hungerford; K Krackow
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The effect of patient gait on the material properties of UHMWPE in hip replacements.

Authors:  Shirley M Davey; John F Orr; Fraser J Buchanan; James R Nixon; Damien Bennett
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  The Use of Europiumstearate to Trace Polyethylene Wear Debris in Joint Fluid after Prosthetic Joint Replacement - A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  J Kunze; V Ngai; S Koelling; J J Jacobs; M A Wimmer
Journal:  Trends Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2013

8.  Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?

Authors:  Zachary W Sisko; Matthew G Teeter; Brent A Lanting; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Edward M Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms.

Authors:  J Gallo; S B Goodman; Y T Konttinen; M A Wimmer; M Holinka
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Variability of TKR knee kinematics and relationship with gait kinetics: implications for total knee wear.

Authors:  Valentina Ngai; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

1.  Joint line elevation and tibial slope are associated with increased polyethylene wear in cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Johannes Cip; Elmira Rad; Michel P Laurent; Richard A Berger; Joshua J Jacobs; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Similar Biomechanical Behavior in Gait Analysis between Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-XLPE Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Athanasios Triantafyllou; Georgios Papagiannis; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; George C Babis
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.