Literature DB >> 32373397

Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

Douglas Archibald1,2, Joseph K Burns2, Michael Fitzgerald2, Véronique French Merkley3.   

Abstract

For hospital physicians, alignment of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) with quality improvement efforts is often absent or rudimentary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CPD development process that created accessible learning opportunities and aligned CPD with practice data. We conducted a chart audit to identify patient safety and quality of care issues within the institution, then established an eLearning approach that supported quick and cost effective development of high-quality interactive CPD opportunities. We tested a pilot module on the management of common infections in sub-acute care settings with fifteen (68%) residents and three staff physicians to evaluate the approach. One resident and three staff agreed to a follow-up interview. The satisfaction survey indicated that participants felt the content was generally appropriate and the module well designed. Significant improvements to knowledge were reported in the multi-drug resistance (Mean Difference = 25%, p = 0.002), infection management (MD = 32%, p < 0.001), and cellulitis risk factor (MD = 22%, p = 0.02) questions, as well as in the overall score (MD = 19%, p < 0.001). In terms of confidence in their answers, the mean rating pre-module was 3.17, rising significantly to 3.92 post-module (p < 0.001). In this way, collaboration between quality management and education committees allowed for the development of relevant CPD for physicians, with eLearning providing a timely and accessible way to deliver training on emerging issues.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuing Professional Development; Elearning; common infections; patient safety; quality of care

Year:  2020        PMID: 32373397      PMCID: PMC7191898          DOI: 10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur CME        ISSN: 2161-4083


  20 in total

Review 1.  The impact of E-learning in medical education.

Authors:  Jorge G Ruiz; Michael J Mintzer; Rosanne M Leipzig
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Self-assessment in lifelong learning and improving performance in practice: physician know thyself.

Authors:  F Daniel Duffy; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Aligning academic continuing medical education with quality improvement: a model for the 21st century.

Authors:  Nancy L Davis; David A Davis; Nathan M Johnson; Katherine L Grichnik; Linda A Headrick; Susan K Pingleton; Elizabeth Bower; Ronald Gibbs
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  It appeared to be a good idea at the time but … A few steps closer to understanding how technology can enhance teaching and learning in medical education.

Authors:  John Sandars
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 5.  The effectiveness of Internet-based e-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter M Sinclair; Ashley Kable; Tracy Levett-Jones; Debbie Booth
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  CPD of the future: a partnership between quality improvement and competency-based education.

Authors:  Joan Sargeant; Brian M Wong; Craig M Campbell
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Physician Attitudes About Maintenance of Certification: A Cross-Specialty National Survey.

Authors:  David A Cook; Morris J Blachman; Colin P West; Christopher M Wittich
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities.

Authors:  Donald E Moore; Joseph S Green; Harry A Gallis
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Breakeven, cost benefit, cost effectiveness, and willingness to pay for web-based versus face-to-face education delivery for health professionals.

Authors:  Stephen Maloney; Romi Haas; Jenny L Keating; Elizabeth Molloy; Brian Jolly; Jane Sims; Prue Morgan; Terry Haines
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Impact of medical student origins on the likelihood of ultimately practicing in areas of low vs high socio-economic status.

Authors:  Ian B Puddey; Denese E Playford; Annette Mercer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.