Literature DB >> 27712632

Physician Attitudes About Maintenance of Certification: A Cross-Specialty National Survey.

David A Cook1, Morris J Blachman2, Colin P West3, Christopher M Wittich4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine physicians' perceptions of current maintenance of certification (MOC) activities and to explore how perceptions vary across specialties, practice characteristics, and physician characteristics, including burnout. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an Internet and paper survey among a national cross-specialty random sample of licensed US physicians from September 23, 2015, through April 18, 2016. The questionnaire included 13 MOC items, 2 burnout items, and demographic variables.
RESULTS: Of 4583 potential respondents, we received 988 responses (response rate 21.6%) closely reflecting the distribution of US physician specialties. Twenty-four percent of physicians (200 of 842) agreed that MOC activities are relevant to their patients, and 15% (122 of 824) felt they are worth the time and effort. Although 27% (223 of 834) perceived adequate support for MOC activities, only 12% (101 of 832) perceived that they are well-integrated in their daily routine and 81% (673 of 835) believed they are a burden. Nine percent (76 of 834) believed that patients care about their MOC status. Forty percent or fewer agreed that various MOC activities contribute to their professional development. Attitudes varied statistically significantly (P<.001) across specialties, but reflected low perceived relevance and value in nearly all specialties. Thirty-eight percent of respondents met criteria for being burned out. We found no association of attitudes toward MOC with burnout, certification status, practice size, rural or urban practice location, compensation model, or time since completion of training.
CONCLUSION: Dissatisfaction with current MOC programs is pervasive and not localized to specific sectors or specialties. Unresolved negative perceptions will impede optimal physician engagement in MOC.
Copyright © 2016 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27712632     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  9 in total

1.  The American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification Examination and State Medical Board Disciplinary Actions: a Population Cohort Study.

Authors:  Furman S McDonald; Lauren M Duhigg; Gerald K Arnold; Ruth M Hafer; Rebecca S Lipner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

Authors:  Douglas Archibald; Joseph K Burns; Michael Fitzgerald; Véronique French Merkley
Journal:  J Eur CME       Date:  2020-04-23

3.  Costs and Benefits of Initial Certification for Emergency Medicine Residency Graduates.

Authors:  Jill M Baren; Michael S Beeson; Carl R Chudnofsky; Deepi G Goyal; Terry Kowalenko; Mary Nan S Mallory; Barry N Heller; Earl J Reisdorff
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

4.  Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds.

Authors:  Adam Bass; Heather Armson; Kevin McLaughlin; Jocelyn Lockyer
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-04-30

5.  Doctors on the move: a European case study on the key characteristics of national recertification systems.

Authors:  Carolin Sehlbach; Marjan J Govaerts; Sharon Mitchell; Gernot G U Rohde; Frank W J M Smeenk; Erik W Driessen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Doctors' attitudes to, beliefs about, and experiences of the regulation of professional competence: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Anél Wiese; Emer Galvin; Charlotte Merrett; Irina Korotchikova; Dubhfeasa Slattery; Lucia Prihodova; Hilary Hoey; Ann O'Shaughnessy; Jantze Cotter; Janet O'Farrell; Mary Horgan; Deirdre Bennett
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-22

7.  Benefits of Providing Feedback and Utilisation Metrics to Specialists on Their Participation in eConsult.

Authors:  Erin Keely; Rhea Mitchell; Sheena Guglani; Douglas Archibald; Amir Afkham; Clare Liddy
Journal:  J Eur CME       Date:  2022-09-02

8.  Primary care physicians' perceptions of practice improvement as a professional responsibility: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Christopher R Stephenson; Christopher M Wittich; Joel E Pacyna; Matthew K Wynia; Omar Hasan; Jon C Tilburt
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2018-12

9.  Physicians' perceptions of autonomy support during transition to value-based reimbursement: A multi-center psychometric evaluation of six-item and three-item measures.

Authors:  Anthony C Waddimba; David C Mohr; Howard B Beckman; Mark M Meterko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.