Literature DB >> 28984354

CPD of the future: a partnership between quality improvement and competency-based education.

Joan Sargeant1, Brian M Wong2,3, Craig M Campbell4,5.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Many of those involved in continuing professional development (CPD) over the past 10 years have engaged in discussions about its goals and activities. Whereas in the past CPD was viewed as an education intervention directed towards the medical expert role, recent research highlights the need to expand the scope of CPD and to promote its more explicit role in improving patient care and health outcomes. Recent developments in quality improvement (QI) and competency-based medical education (CBME), guided by appropriate theories of learning and change, can shed light on how the field might best advance. This paper describes principles of QI and CBME and how they might contribute to CPD, explores theoretical perspectives that inform such an integration and suggests a future model of CPD. DISCUSSION: Continuing professional development seeks to improve patient outcomes by increasing physician knowledge and skills and changing behaviours, whereas QI takes the approach of system and process change. Combining the strengths of a CPD approach with strategies known to be effective from the field of QI has the potential to harmonise the contributions of each, and thereby to lead to better patient outcomes. Similarly, competency-based CPD is envisioned to place health needs and patient outcomes at the centre of a CPD system that will be guided by a set of competencies to enhance the quality of practice and the safety of the health system.
CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the future CPD system should adhere to the following principles: it should be grounded in the everyday workplace, integrated into the health care system, oriented to patient outcomes, guided by multiple sources of performance and outcome data, and team-based; it should employ the principles and strategies of QI, and should be taken on as a collective responsibility by physicians, CPD provider organisations, regulators and the health system.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28984354     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  9 in total

1.  Beyond the CLAIM: A comprehensive needs assessment strategy for creating an Advanced Medical Education Research Training Program (ARMED-MedEd).

Authors:  Teresa M Chan; Jaime Jordan; Samuel O Clarke; Luan Lawson; Wendy C Coates; Lalena M Yarris; Sally A Santen; Michael Gottlieb
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2022-02-01

2.  Physicians' Choice of Board Certification Activity Is Unaffected by Baseline Quality of Care: The TRADEMaRQ Study.

Authors:  Lars E Peterson; John Johannides; Robert L Phillips
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Evaluation of a training programme for Pharmacist Independent Prescribers in a care home medicine management intervention.

Authors:  L Birt; L Dalgarno; C M Bond; R Holland; D P Alldred; C Hughes; A Blyth; L Watts; D J Wright
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.263

4.  Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

Authors:  Douglas Archibald; Joseph K Burns; Michael Fitzgerald; Véronique French Merkley
Journal:  J Eur CME       Date:  2020-04-23

5.  Early procedural training increases anesthesiology residents' clinical production: a comparative pre-post study of the payoff in clinical training.

Authors:  Claus Hedebo Bisgaard; Svein Aage Rodt; Peter Musaeus; Jens Aage Kølsen Petersen; Sune Leisgaard Mørck Rubak
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Continuing education in pain management: using a competency framework to guide professional development.

Authors:  Elizabeth Devonshire; Michael K Nicholas
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2018-09-17

Review 7.  Continuing professional development requirements for UK health professionals: a scoping review.

Authors:  Marek Karas; Nik J L Sheen; Rachel V North; Barbara Ryan; Alison Bullock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Perceptions and satisfaction of a mandatory continuing professional development programme amongst Aotearoa New Zealand podiatrists.

Authors:  Matthew Carroll; Angela Brenton-Rule; Hannah Jepson; Prue Molyneux
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Impact of an educational intervention combining clinical obesity preceptorship with electronic networking tools on primary care professionals: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jean-Patrice Baillargeon; Denise St-Cyr-Tribble; Marianne Xhignesse; Christine Brown; André C Carpentier; Martin Fortin; Andrew Grant; Judith Simoneau-Roy; Marie-France Langlois
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.