Literature DB >> 3235661

Evaluation of the modified Bac-T-Screen and FiltraCheck-UTI urine screening systems for detection of clinically significant bacteriuria.

P R Murray1, A C Niles, R L Heeren, F Pikul.   

Abstract

Previous evaluations of the Bac-T-Screen system (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) demonstrated excellent sensitivity with specimens from patients with clinically significant bacteriuria (including infections with small numbers of uropathogens) but poor specificity with specimens from noninfected patients. In the study reported here, the sensitivity and specificity of the Bac-T-Screen system with a modified decolorizing reagent were evaluated. A manual filtration system, FiltraCheck-UTI (Vitek Systems), for screening urine specimens, Gram stains of mixed urine specimens, and quantitative cultures were also evaluated. The test sensitivity for clinically significant bacteriuria was greater than 96% with the original Bac-T-Screen system as well as the modified system and the manual system. In comparison, the sensitivities of the Gram stains and quantitative cultures (greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml) were 82 and 77%, respectively. Of the 375 patients classified as noninfected by clinical parameters, 34% had positive screening tests with the original Bac-T-Screen system, as compared with 13 and 11% with the modified Bac-T-Screen and FiltraCheck-UTI systems, respectively. Thus, the modified Bac-T-Screen system and the manual FiltraCheck-UTI system have sensitives comparable to that of the original Bac-T-Screen system and markedly improved test specificities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3235661      PMCID: PMC266890          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2347-2350.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  FiltraCheck-UTI, a rapid, disposable system for detection of bacteriuria.

Authors:  C C Longoria; G A Gonzalez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of a urine screening device.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; C A Baum; A C Niles; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of bacteriuria and pyuria within two minutes.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo; M A Wetkowski; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Clinical relevance of culture versus screens for the detection of microbial pathogens in urine specimens.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J P Manzella; S N Shaffer; B B Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Clinical evaluation of three urine screening tests.

Authors:  P R Murray; T B Smith; T C McKinney
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Multicenter Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS): Comparison Between Digital Image and Traditional Plate Reading Using Urine Cultures.

Authors:  John Glasson; Rhys Hill; Michael Summerford; Dianne Olden; Fotula Papadopoulos; Stephen Young; Steven Giglio
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.464

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.