Literature DB >> 3571450

Clinical evaluation of three urine screening tests.

P R Murray, T B Smith, T C McKinney.   

Abstract

Evaluations of screening tests for bacteriuria have traditionally compared the test results with those of quantitative urine cultures. However, many patients with symptomatic urinary tract infections can have less than 10(5) CFU/ml in their urine. Therefore, the results of urine culture and three screening tests (Bac-T-Screen, Chemstrip LN [which tests for leukocyte esterase and nitrate reductase], and Gram stain) were correlated with the clinical classification of urinary tract infection. The Bac-T-Screen test detected 98, 93, and 100% of the infections classified as probable, possible, and asymptomatic, respectively. In contrast, the Gram stain, leukocyte esterase, and nitrate reductase tests were all insensitive screening tests for infection. Additionally, only 45% of the patients with probable infections had greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml. Thus, the majority of infected patients would not have been detected if quantitative urine cultures were used alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3571450      PMCID: PMC265953          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.3.467-470.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract; with observations on the use of methionine as a urinary antiseptic.

Authors:  E H KASS
Journal:  AMA Arch Intern Med       Date:  1957-11

2.  Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract.

Authors:  E H KASS
Journal:  Trans Assoc Am Physicians       Date:  1956

3.  Evaluation of the positive urine culture; an approach to the differentiation of significant bacteria from contaminants.

Authors:  J P SANFORD; C B FAVOUR; F H MAO; J H HARRISON
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1956-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  THE INCIDENCE OF UNSUSPECTED URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN A SELECTED GROUP OF AMBULATORY WOMEN.

Authors:  R H Barr; L A Rantz
Journal:  Calif Med       Date:  1948-06

5.  Review of urine microscopy for bacteriuria.

Authors:  R D Jenkins; J P Fenn; J M Matsen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Urinary infections: a selective review and some observations.

Authors:  T A Stamey; A Pfau
Journal:  Calif Med       Date:  1970-12

7.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of a urine screening device.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; C A Baum; A C Niles; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Diagnosis of coliform infection in acutely dysuric women.

Authors:  W E Stamm; G W Counts; K R Running; S Fihn; M Turck; K K Holmes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Urinalysis and urine culture in women with dysuria.

Authors:  A L Komaroff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Bacteriuria in the catheterized patient. What quantitative level of bacteriuria is relevant?

Authors:  R P Stark; D G Maki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  13 in total

1.  Processing urine specimens: overnight versus two-day incubation.

Authors:  F Soriano; C Ponte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Analyses of the FlashTrack DNA probe and UTIscreen bioluminescence tests for bacteriuria.

Authors:  C Koenig; L J Tick; B A Hanna
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid bioluminescence method for bacteriuria screening.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo; V Ige; A P Woolard; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Efficacy of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of urinary tract immunoglobulins for diagnosis of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J P Manzella; J W Seiple; S J Fortna; J W Cook; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of six screening methods for detecting significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  T K Smith; A J Hudson; R C Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Visual and clinical analysis of Bac-T-Screen urine screen results.

Authors:  E J Baron; M B Tyburski; R Almon; M Berman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of the modified Bac-T-Screen and FiltraCheck-UTI urine screening systems for detection of clinically significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles; R L Heeren; F Pikul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Controversies in the laboratory diagnosis of community-acquired urinary tract infection.

Authors:  M G Morgan; H McKenzie
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 9.  Detection of urinary tract infections by rapid methods.

Authors:  M Pezzlo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Detection of pyuria and bacteriuria in symptomatic ambulatory women.

Authors:  R N Blum; R A Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.